Decision-Making of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain in the Context Government Policy: A Dynamic Game Theory

To analyze the effect of government reward-penalty policies (RPPs) on the decisions of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), this paper endogenizes government decision variables to maximize social welfare and builds four decision-making models (without RPP, with carbon emission RPP, with r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuemei Zhang, Qianwen Li, Guohu Qi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2313698
id doaj-4a83b17957134672816d09cf01835a98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a83b17957134672816d09cf01835a982020-11-25T03:29:46ZengHindawi LimitedDiscrete Dynamics in Nature and Society1026-02261607-887X2020-01-01202010.1155/2020/23136982313698Decision-Making of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain in the Context Government Policy: A Dynamic Game TheoryXuemei Zhang0Qianwen Li1Guohu Qi2School of Business, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, Anhui 236037, ChinaSchool of Business, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, Anhui 236037, ChinaSchool of Business, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, Anhui 236037, ChinaTo analyze the effect of government reward-penalty policies (RPPs) on the decisions of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), this paper endogenizes government decision variables to maximize social welfare and builds four decision-making models (without RPP, with carbon emission RPP, with recycling amount RPP, and with double RPP) by using a Stackelberg dynamic game between the government and supply chain members. The research results show that, (1) in the four models, there exist optimal prices and reward-penalty coefficients to maximize the supply chain members’ profits and social welfare. (2) Comparing with model W, under most conditions, three government RPPs decrease the demand for new products and increase the demand for remanufactured products. Comparing the case without RPP, R’s profit decreases, and when the carbon emission cap is very big and the lowest recycling amount is very small, M’s profit increases. (3) In most cases, the three government RPPs can effectively control the total carbon emission and increase the social welfare, but they damage the benefits of retailers and consumers. With the increase of the carbon emission intensity of remanufactured products, the government can implement the double RPP, the carbon emission RPP, and the recycling amount RPP in turn.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2313698
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xuemei Zhang
Qianwen Li
Guohu Qi
spellingShingle Xuemei Zhang
Qianwen Li
Guohu Qi
Decision-Making of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain in the Context Government Policy: A Dynamic Game Theory
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
author_facet Xuemei Zhang
Qianwen Li
Guohu Qi
author_sort Xuemei Zhang
title Decision-Making of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain in the Context Government Policy: A Dynamic Game Theory
title_short Decision-Making of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain in the Context Government Policy: A Dynamic Game Theory
title_full Decision-Making of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain in the Context Government Policy: A Dynamic Game Theory
title_fullStr Decision-Making of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain in the Context Government Policy: A Dynamic Game Theory
title_full_unstemmed Decision-Making of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain in the Context Government Policy: A Dynamic Game Theory
title_sort decision-making of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain in the context government policy: a dynamic game theory
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
issn 1026-0226
1607-887X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description To analyze the effect of government reward-penalty policies (RPPs) on the decisions of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), this paper endogenizes government decision variables to maximize social welfare and builds four decision-making models (without RPP, with carbon emission RPP, with recycling amount RPP, and with double RPP) by using a Stackelberg dynamic game between the government and supply chain members. The research results show that, (1) in the four models, there exist optimal prices and reward-penalty coefficients to maximize the supply chain members’ profits and social welfare. (2) Comparing with model W, under most conditions, three government RPPs decrease the demand for new products and increase the demand for remanufactured products. Comparing the case without RPP, R’s profit decreases, and when the carbon emission cap is very big and the lowest recycling amount is very small, M’s profit increases. (3) In most cases, the three government RPPs can effectively control the total carbon emission and increase the social welfare, but they damage the benefits of retailers and consumers. With the increase of the carbon emission intensity of remanufactured products, the government can implement the double RPP, the carbon emission RPP, and the recycling amount RPP in turn.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2313698
work_keys_str_mv AT xuemeizhang decisionmakingofadualchannelclosedloopsupplychaininthecontextgovernmentpolicyadynamicgametheory
AT qianwenli decisionmakingofadualchannelclosedloopsupplychaininthecontextgovernmentpolicyadynamicgametheory
AT guohuqi decisionmakingofadualchannelclosedloopsupplychaininthecontextgovernmentpolicyadynamicgametheory
_version_ 1715197402525204480