‘[A] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: Reading and Secrecy in the Poetry of Anna Mendelssohn

In stating that a ‘poet must know | more than a surface suggests’ (Propaganda multi-billion bun), Anna Mendelssohn ascribes to the poet a kind of secret knowledge of that which resides beyond the apparent meaning of a poem, beneath its textual surface or skin. This article considers how far a reader...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vicky Sparrow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2018-03-01
Series:Journal of British and Irish Innovative Poetry
Online Access:https://poetry.openlibhums.org/article/id/726/
id doaj-4a822df1aa1a4d428435256f655a2afd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a822df1aa1a4d428435256f655a2afd2021-08-18T10:58:07ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesJournal of British and Irish Innovative Poetry1758-972X2018-03-0110110.16995/biip.27‘[A] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: Reading and Secrecy in the Poetry of Anna MendelssohnVicky Sparrow0 In stating that a ‘poet must know | more than a surface suggests’ (Propaganda multi-billion bun), Anna Mendelssohn ascribes to the poet a kind of secret knowledge of that which resides beyond the apparent meaning of a poem, beneath its textual surface or skin. This article considers how far a reader of Mendelssohn’s poetry can be invited to share in this knowledge – on what grounds and at what risk. Mendelssohn’s construction of such hidden poetic knowledge is also considered in the light of Walter Benjamin’s contention that the secret is of fundamental importance to the production of aesthetic experience itself. If a reader of Mendelssohn ‘mustn’t touch the hiding places’ (Implacable Art) of a text, then how do we, as readers, offer close, interpretive attention to Mendelssohn’s difficult, implacable poetry without intruding on its secrets?In foregrounding close-readings of one of Mendelssohn’s most encoded texts, her pamphlet An Account of a Mummy, in the Royal Cabinet of Antiquities at Dresden (1986), textual disruptions of the relationship between concealment and exposure, and questions of readability and unreadability are explored. Teasing out moments of poetic secreting and revealing in Mendelssohn’s work, this article considers how far Mendelssohn’s poetics resists the logic of interrogation – and asks, crucially, what is at stake in such resistance for a close-reader of her poetry.https://poetry.openlibhums.org/article/id/726/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vicky Sparrow
spellingShingle Vicky Sparrow
‘[A] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: Reading and Secrecy in the Poetry of Anna Mendelssohn
Journal of British and Irish Innovative Poetry
author_facet Vicky Sparrow
author_sort Vicky Sparrow
title ‘[A] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: Reading and Secrecy in the Poetry of Anna Mendelssohn
title_short ‘[A] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: Reading and Secrecy in the Poetry of Anna Mendelssohn
title_full ‘[A] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: Reading and Secrecy in the Poetry of Anna Mendelssohn
title_fullStr ‘[A] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: Reading and Secrecy in the Poetry of Anna Mendelssohn
title_full_unstemmed ‘[A] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: Reading and Secrecy in the Poetry of Anna Mendelssohn
title_sort ‘[a] poet must know more than | a surface suggests’: reading and secrecy in the poetry of anna mendelssohn
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Journal of British and Irish Innovative Poetry
issn 1758-972X
publishDate 2018-03-01
description In stating that a ‘poet must know | more than a surface suggests’ (Propaganda multi-billion bun), Anna Mendelssohn ascribes to the poet a kind of secret knowledge of that which resides beyond the apparent meaning of a poem, beneath its textual surface or skin. This article considers how far a reader of Mendelssohn’s poetry can be invited to share in this knowledge – on what grounds and at what risk. Mendelssohn’s construction of such hidden poetic knowledge is also considered in the light of Walter Benjamin’s contention that the secret is of fundamental importance to the production of aesthetic experience itself. If a reader of Mendelssohn ‘mustn’t touch the hiding places’ (Implacable Art) of a text, then how do we, as readers, offer close, interpretive attention to Mendelssohn’s difficult, implacable poetry without intruding on its secrets?In foregrounding close-readings of one of Mendelssohn’s most encoded texts, her pamphlet An Account of a Mummy, in the Royal Cabinet of Antiquities at Dresden (1986), textual disruptions of the relationship between concealment and exposure, and questions of readability and unreadability are explored. Teasing out moments of poetic secreting and revealing in Mendelssohn’s work, this article considers how far Mendelssohn’s poetics resists the logic of interrogation – and asks, crucially, what is at stake in such resistance for a close-reader of her poetry.
url https://poetry.openlibhums.org/article/id/726/
work_keys_str_mv AT vickysparrow apoetmustknowmorethanasurfacesuggestsreadingandsecrecyinthepoetryofannamendelssohn
_version_ 1721202975644319744