The “Whence” of Evil and How the Demiurge Can Alleviate Our Suffering
Mid-twentieth century witnessed a renewal of the interest in the problem of evil, presented by Mackie et al. in the form of the logical argument from evil. However, this argument was proven ineffective in securing victory over theism. A more successful strategy was devised by Rowe and DraperR...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/3/137 |
id |
doaj-4a705c2b7be3462f9bdda9d7ce5fac3c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4a705c2b7be3462f9bdda9d7ce5fac3c2020-11-25T03:29:28ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442020-03-0111313710.3390/rel11030137rel11030137The “Whence” of Evil and How the Demiurge Can Alleviate Our SufferingViktor Ilievski0Philosophy Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Edificio B Campus de la UAB Bellatera, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, SpainMid-twentieth century witnessed a renewal of the interest in the problem of evil, presented by Mackie et al. in the form of the logical argument from evil. However, this argument was proven ineffective in securing victory over theism. A more successful strategy was devised by Rowe and Draper—the so-called evidential argument from evil. I believe that the current responses to it fail to defend God. In this paper, I try to face the evidential argument by embracing a triple strategy, which involves an alternative theology. First, a shift of focus regarding suffering from the prevalent anthropocentrism to the perspective of soteriological teleology is proposed. Second, I present a theodicy in line with Plato’s approach in the <i>Timaeus</i>, as well as with some aspects of the theodicy in the <i>Vedānta-sūtra</i> II.1.32−36. Third, I argue that, if the previous two steps contribute towards a plausible answer to the problem of evil, the modified concept of the deity and the associated cosmogonical account should be brought close to the picture of Plato’s demiurge and his act of creation. If it is to provide a successful defense of theism against the problem of evil, that price should not be considered too dear.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/3/137problem of eviltheodicyplatodemiurgereincarnationkarma |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Viktor Ilievski |
spellingShingle |
Viktor Ilievski The “Whence” of Evil and How the Demiurge Can Alleviate Our Suffering Religions problem of evil theodicy plato demiurge reincarnation karma |
author_facet |
Viktor Ilievski |
author_sort |
Viktor Ilievski |
title |
The “Whence” of Evil and How the Demiurge Can Alleviate Our Suffering |
title_short |
The “Whence” of Evil and How the Demiurge Can Alleviate Our Suffering |
title_full |
The “Whence” of Evil and How the Demiurge Can Alleviate Our Suffering |
title_fullStr |
The “Whence” of Evil and How the Demiurge Can Alleviate Our Suffering |
title_full_unstemmed |
The “Whence” of Evil and How the Demiurge Can Alleviate Our Suffering |
title_sort |
“whence” of evil and how the demiurge can alleviate our suffering |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Mid-twentieth century witnessed a renewal of the interest in the problem of evil, presented by Mackie et al. in the form of the logical argument from evil. However, this argument was proven ineffective in securing victory over theism. A more successful strategy was devised by Rowe and Draper—the so-called evidential argument from evil. I believe that the current responses to it fail to defend God. In this paper, I try to face the evidential argument by embracing a triple strategy, which involves an alternative theology. First, a shift of focus regarding suffering from the prevalent anthropocentrism to the perspective of soteriological teleology is proposed. Second, I present a theodicy in line with Plato’s approach in the <i>Timaeus</i>, as well as with some aspects of the theodicy in the <i>Vedānta-sūtra</i> II.1.32−36. Third, I argue that, if the previous two steps contribute towards a plausible answer to the problem of evil, the modified concept of the deity and the associated cosmogonical account should be brought close to the picture of Plato’s demiurge and his act of creation. If it is to provide a successful defense of theism against the problem of evil, that price should not be considered too dear. |
topic |
problem of evil theodicy plato demiurge reincarnation karma |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/3/137 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT viktorilievski thewhenceofevilandhowthedemiurgecanalleviateoursuffering AT viktorilievski whenceofevilandhowthedemiurgecanalleviateoursuffering |
_version_ |
1724579048263254016 |