Feedback, Mass Conservation and Reaction Kinetics Impact the Robustness of Cellular Oscillations.

Oscillations occur in a wide variety of cellular processes, for example in calcium and p53 signaling responses, in metabolic pathways or within gene-regulatory networks, e.g. the circadian system. Since it is of central importance to understand the influence of perturbations on the dynamics of these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katharina Baum, Antonio Z Politi, Bente Kofahl, Ralf Steuer, Jana Wolf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-12-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5226835?pdf=render
id doaj-4a39bf856da5472fbfc6ba2812dbdbfc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a39bf856da5472fbfc6ba2812dbdbfc2020-11-24T21:51:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582016-12-011212e100529810.1371/journal.pcbi.1005298Feedback, Mass Conservation and Reaction Kinetics Impact the Robustness of Cellular Oscillations.Katharina BaumAntonio Z PolitiBente KofahlRalf SteuerJana WolfOscillations occur in a wide variety of cellular processes, for example in calcium and p53 signaling responses, in metabolic pathways or within gene-regulatory networks, e.g. the circadian system. Since it is of central importance to understand the influence of perturbations on the dynamics of these systems a number of experimental and theoretical studies have examined their robustness. The period of circadian oscillations has been found to be very robust and to provide reliable timing. For intracellular calcium oscillations the period has been shown to be very sensitive and to allow for frequency-encoded signaling. We here apply a comprehensive computational approach to study the robustness of period and amplitude of oscillatory systems. We employ different prototype oscillator models and a large number of parameter sets obtained by random sampling. This framework is used to examine the effect of three design principles on the sensitivities towards perturbations of the kinetic parameters. We find that a prototype oscillator with negative feedback has lower period sensitivities than a prototype oscillator relying on positive feedback, but on average higher amplitude sensitivities. For both oscillator types, the use of Michaelis-Menten instead of mass action kinetics in all degradation and conversion reactions leads to an increase in period as well as amplitude sensitivities. We observe moderate changes in sensitivities if replacing mass conversion reactions by purely regulatory reactions. These insights are validated for a set of established models of various cellular rhythms. Overall, our work highlights the importance of reaction kinetics and feedback type for the variability of period and amplitude and therefore for the establishment of predictive models.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5226835?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katharina Baum
Antonio Z Politi
Bente Kofahl
Ralf Steuer
Jana Wolf
spellingShingle Katharina Baum
Antonio Z Politi
Bente Kofahl
Ralf Steuer
Jana Wolf
Feedback, Mass Conservation and Reaction Kinetics Impact the Robustness of Cellular Oscillations.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Katharina Baum
Antonio Z Politi
Bente Kofahl
Ralf Steuer
Jana Wolf
author_sort Katharina Baum
title Feedback, Mass Conservation and Reaction Kinetics Impact the Robustness of Cellular Oscillations.
title_short Feedback, Mass Conservation and Reaction Kinetics Impact the Robustness of Cellular Oscillations.
title_full Feedback, Mass Conservation and Reaction Kinetics Impact the Robustness of Cellular Oscillations.
title_fullStr Feedback, Mass Conservation and Reaction Kinetics Impact the Robustness of Cellular Oscillations.
title_full_unstemmed Feedback, Mass Conservation and Reaction Kinetics Impact the Robustness of Cellular Oscillations.
title_sort feedback, mass conservation and reaction kinetics impact the robustness of cellular oscillations.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Oscillations occur in a wide variety of cellular processes, for example in calcium and p53 signaling responses, in metabolic pathways or within gene-regulatory networks, e.g. the circadian system. Since it is of central importance to understand the influence of perturbations on the dynamics of these systems a number of experimental and theoretical studies have examined their robustness. The period of circadian oscillations has been found to be very robust and to provide reliable timing. For intracellular calcium oscillations the period has been shown to be very sensitive and to allow for frequency-encoded signaling. We here apply a comprehensive computational approach to study the robustness of period and amplitude of oscillatory systems. We employ different prototype oscillator models and a large number of parameter sets obtained by random sampling. This framework is used to examine the effect of three design principles on the sensitivities towards perturbations of the kinetic parameters. We find that a prototype oscillator with negative feedback has lower period sensitivities than a prototype oscillator relying on positive feedback, but on average higher amplitude sensitivities. For both oscillator types, the use of Michaelis-Menten instead of mass action kinetics in all degradation and conversion reactions leads to an increase in period as well as amplitude sensitivities. We observe moderate changes in sensitivities if replacing mass conversion reactions by purely regulatory reactions. These insights are validated for a set of established models of various cellular rhythms. Overall, our work highlights the importance of reaction kinetics and feedback type for the variability of period and amplitude and therefore for the establishment of predictive models.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5226835?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT katharinabaum feedbackmassconservationandreactionkineticsimpacttherobustnessofcellularoscillations
AT antoniozpoliti feedbackmassconservationandreactionkineticsimpacttherobustnessofcellularoscillations
AT bentekofahl feedbackmassconservationandreactionkineticsimpacttherobustnessofcellularoscillations
AT ralfsteuer feedbackmassconservationandreactionkineticsimpacttherobustnessofcellularoscillations
AT janawolf feedbackmassconservationandreactionkineticsimpacttherobustnessofcellularoscillations
_version_ 1725879626181378048