Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task Switching

Previous studies on voluntary task switching using the self-organized task switching paradigm suggest that task performance and task selection in multitasking are related. When deciding between two tasks, the stimulus associated with a task repetition occurred with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irina Monno, Markus Spitzer, Jeff Miller, David Dignath, Andrea Kiesel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/137
id doaj-4a393d9804d54036825d31cfddd402aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a393d9804d54036825d31cfddd402aa2021-02-11T07:01:18ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202021-01-014110.5334/joc.137155Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task SwitchingIrina Monno0Markus Spitzer1Jeff Miller2David Dignath3Andrea Kiesel4University of FreiburgUniversity of FreiburgUniversity of OtagoUniversity of FreiburgUniversity of FreiburgPrevious studies on voluntary task switching using the self-organized task switching paradigm suggest that task performance and task selection in multitasking are related. When deciding between two tasks, the stimulus associated with a task repetition occurred with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) that continuously increased with the number of repetitions, while the stimulus associated with a task switch was immediately available. Thus, the waiting time for the repetition stimulus increased with number of consecutive task repetitions. Two main results were shown: first, switch costs and voluntary switch rates correlated negatively – the smaller the switch costs, the larger the switch rates. Second, participants switched tasks when switch costs and waiting time for the repetition stimulus were similar. In the present study, we varied the SOA that increased with number of task repetitions ('SOA increment') and also varied the size of the switch costs by varying the intertrial interval. We examined which combination of SOA increment and switch costs maximizes participants’ attempts to balance waiting time and switch costs in self-organized task switching. We found that small SOA increments allow for fine-grained adaptation and that participants can best balance their switch costs and waiting times in settings with medium switch costs and small SOA increments. In addition, correlational analyses indicate relations between individual switch costs and individual switch rates across participants.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/137multitaskingvoluntary taskswitchingswitch costs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Irina Monno
Markus Spitzer
Jeff Miller
David Dignath
Andrea Kiesel
spellingShingle Irina Monno
Markus Spitzer
Jeff Miller
David Dignath
Andrea Kiesel
Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task Switching
Journal of Cognition
multitasking
voluntary taskswitching
switch costs
author_facet Irina Monno
Markus Spitzer
Jeff Miller
David Dignath
Andrea Kiesel
author_sort Irina Monno
title Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task Switching
title_short Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task Switching
title_full Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task Switching
title_fullStr Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task Switching
title_full_unstemmed Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task Switching
title_sort scaling of the parameters for cost balancing in self- organized task switching
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Previous studies on voluntary task switching using the self-organized task switching paradigm suggest that task performance and task selection in multitasking are related. When deciding between two tasks, the stimulus associated with a task repetition occurred with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) that continuously increased with the number of repetitions, while the stimulus associated with a task switch was immediately available. Thus, the waiting time for the repetition stimulus increased with number of consecutive task repetitions. Two main results were shown: first, switch costs and voluntary switch rates correlated negatively – the smaller the switch costs, the larger the switch rates. Second, participants switched tasks when switch costs and waiting time for the repetition stimulus were similar. In the present study, we varied the SOA that increased with number of task repetitions ('SOA increment') and also varied the size of the switch costs by varying the intertrial interval. We examined which combination of SOA increment and switch costs maximizes participants’ attempts to balance waiting time and switch costs in self-organized task switching. We found that small SOA increments allow for fine-grained adaptation and that participants can best balance their switch costs and waiting times in settings with medium switch costs and small SOA increments. In addition, correlational analyses indicate relations between individual switch costs and individual switch rates across participants.
topic multitasking
voluntary taskswitching
switch costs
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/137
work_keys_str_mv AT irinamonno scalingoftheparametersforcostbalancinginselforganizedtaskswitching
AT markusspitzer scalingoftheparametersforcostbalancinginselforganizedtaskswitching
AT jeffmiller scalingoftheparametersforcostbalancinginselforganizedtaskswitching
AT daviddignath scalingoftheparametersforcostbalancinginselforganizedtaskswitching
AT andreakiesel scalingoftheparametersforcostbalancinginselforganizedtaskswitching
_version_ 1724274427442495488