Rural technology and agribusiness in Argentina. The rationale underpinning the dominant technological model

<p>The paper analyses the main characteristics of the technological model fostered by agribusiness in Argentina, discusses its main problems and highlights the need to analyze it within a broader economic and political context. This technology is described as a technological fix and three main...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel M. Caceres
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de La Plata 2015-04-01
Series:Mundo Agrario
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mundoagrario.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/5055
id doaj-4a38b32ba4394226a949e18015e5d540
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a38b32ba4394226a949e18015e5d5402020-11-24T21:05:55ZengUniversidad Nacional de La PlataMundo Agrario1515-59942015-04-0116315292Rural technology and agribusiness in Argentina. The rationale underpinning the dominant technological modelDaniel M. Caceres0Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas (CONICET)<p>The paper analyses the main characteristics of the technological model fostered by agribusiness in Argentina, discusses its main problems and highlights the need to analyze it within a broader economic and political context. This technology is described as a technological fix and three main attributes are presented: instantaneity, transitoriness, and recurrence. The supposed efficiency of the productive model fostered by agribusiness occurs at the expense of natural capital depletion and at the costs internalized by other social actors. This is happening either via accumulation by dispossession, or through the socialization and temporal deferment of its negative externalities. Its strength largely transcends the technological domains. To bring this model into question would imply not only to object its visible head (i.e., agribusiness), but also to question the institutions (scientific, educative, juridical, and administrative) and the political structures that support it. Finally, the paper discusses some alternatives and suggests to develop a political agronomy for Latin America.</p><p> </p>http://www.mundoagrario.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/5055tecnología agropecuariatecnología modernaagronegociostechnological fixagronomía política.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel M. Caceres
spellingShingle Daniel M. Caceres
Rural technology and agribusiness in Argentina. The rationale underpinning the dominant technological model
Mundo Agrario
tecnología agropecuaria
tecnología moderna
agronegocios
technological fix
agronomía política.
author_facet Daniel M. Caceres
author_sort Daniel M. Caceres
title Rural technology and agribusiness in Argentina. The rationale underpinning the dominant technological model
title_short Rural technology and agribusiness in Argentina. The rationale underpinning the dominant technological model
title_full Rural technology and agribusiness in Argentina. The rationale underpinning the dominant technological model
title_fullStr Rural technology and agribusiness in Argentina. The rationale underpinning the dominant technological model
title_full_unstemmed Rural technology and agribusiness in Argentina. The rationale underpinning the dominant technological model
title_sort rural technology and agribusiness in argentina. the rationale underpinning the dominant technological model
publisher Universidad Nacional de La Plata
series Mundo Agrario
issn 1515-5994
publishDate 2015-04-01
description <p>The paper analyses the main characteristics of the technological model fostered by agribusiness in Argentina, discusses its main problems and highlights the need to analyze it within a broader economic and political context. This technology is described as a technological fix and three main attributes are presented: instantaneity, transitoriness, and recurrence. The supposed efficiency of the productive model fostered by agribusiness occurs at the expense of natural capital depletion and at the costs internalized by other social actors. This is happening either via accumulation by dispossession, or through the socialization and temporal deferment of its negative externalities. Its strength largely transcends the technological domains. To bring this model into question would imply not only to object its visible head (i.e., agribusiness), but also to question the institutions (scientific, educative, juridical, and administrative) and the political structures that support it. Finally, the paper discusses some alternatives and suggests to develop a political agronomy for Latin America.</p><p> </p>
topic tecnología agropecuaria
tecnología moderna
agronegocios
technological fix
agronomía política.
url http://www.mundoagrario.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/5055
work_keys_str_mv AT danielmcaceres ruraltechnologyandagribusinessinargentinatherationaleunderpinningthedominanttechnologicalmodel
_version_ 1716767423783239680