Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Background: Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petter Jakobsson, Madleine Lindgren, Jan G. Jakobsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2017-04-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/6-389/v2
id doaj-4a004af9e08d40d7a704da97fed5371a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a004af9e08d40d7a704da97fed5371a2020-11-25T02:49:33ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022017-04-01610.12688/f1000research.11255.212427Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]Petter Jakobsson0Madleine Lindgren1Jan G. Jakobsson2Faculty of Medicine, University of Lund, Lund, 221 00, SwedenDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyds University Hospital, Stockholm, 182 88 , SwedenDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyds University Hospital, Stockholm, 182 88 , SwedenBackground: Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrations in the circle system, thereby controlling the depth of anaesthesia.  Methods: We studied the wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in the circle system with fixed fresh gas flow and vaporizer setting. We compared two modern anaesthesia work stations, the Aisys (GE, Madison, WI, USA) and FLOW-i (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) in a test lung model.  Results: We found fresh-gas flow to have, as expected, a major influence on wash-in, as well as wash-out of sevoflurane. The wash-in time to reach a stable circle 1 MAC (2.1%) decreased from an average of 547 ± 83 seconds with a constant fresh gas flow of 300 ml/min and vaporizer setting of 8%, to a mean of 38 ± 6 seconds at a fresh gas flow of 4 L/min. There were only minor differences between the two works-stations tested; the Aisys was slightly faster at both 300 and 4 L/min flow. Time to further increase circle end-tidal concentration from 1-1.5 MAC showed likewise significant associations to fresh gas and decreased from 330 ± 24 seconds at 300 ml/min. to less than a minute at constant 4 L/min (17 ± 11 seconds), without anaesthetic machine difference. Wash-out was also fresh gas flow dependent and plateaued at 7.5 L/min.  Conclusions: Circle system wash-in and wash-out show clear fresh gas dependency and varies somewhat between the Aisys and Flow-i. The circle saturation, reaching 1 MAC end-tidal or increasing from 1-1.5 MAC can be achieved with both work-stations within 1.5 minutes at a constant fresh gas flow of 2 and 4 L/min. Wash-out plateaued at 7.5 L/min.https://f1000research.com/articles/6-389/v2Technology & Monitoring in Anesthesiology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Petter Jakobsson
Madleine Lindgren
Jan G. Jakobsson
spellingShingle Petter Jakobsson
Madleine Lindgren
Jan G. Jakobsson
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
F1000Research
Technology & Monitoring in Anesthesiology
author_facet Petter Jakobsson
Madleine Lindgren
Jan G. Jakobsson
author_sort Petter Jakobsson
title Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_short Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_full Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_fullStr Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_full_unstemmed Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_sort wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: a comparison between aisys and flow-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Background: Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrations in the circle system, thereby controlling the depth of anaesthesia.  Methods: We studied the wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in the circle system with fixed fresh gas flow and vaporizer setting. We compared two modern anaesthesia work stations, the Aisys (GE, Madison, WI, USA) and FLOW-i (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) in a test lung model.  Results: We found fresh-gas flow to have, as expected, a major influence on wash-in, as well as wash-out of sevoflurane. The wash-in time to reach a stable circle 1 MAC (2.1%) decreased from an average of 547 ± 83 seconds with a constant fresh gas flow of 300 ml/min and vaporizer setting of 8%, to a mean of 38 ± 6 seconds at a fresh gas flow of 4 L/min. There were only minor differences between the two works-stations tested; the Aisys was slightly faster at both 300 and 4 L/min flow. Time to further increase circle end-tidal concentration from 1-1.5 MAC showed likewise significant associations to fresh gas and decreased from 330 ± 24 seconds at 300 ml/min. to less than a minute at constant 4 L/min (17 ± 11 seconds), without anaesthetic machine difference. Wash-out was also fresh gas flow dependent and plateaued at 7.5 L/min.  Conclusions: Circle system wash-in and wash-out show clear fresh gas dependency and varies somewhat between the Aisys and Flow-i. The circle saturation, reaching 1 MAC end-tidal or increasing from 1-1.5 MAC can be achieved with both work-stations within 1.5 minutes at a constant fresh gas flow of 2 and 4 L/min. Wash-out plateaued at 7.5 L/min.
topic Technology & Monitoring in Anesthesiology
url https://f1000research.com/articles/6-389/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT petterjakobsson washinandwashoutofsevofluraneinatestlungmodelacomparisonbetweenaisysandflowiversion2referees2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT madleinelindgren washinandwashoutofsevofluraneinatestlungmodelacomparisonbetweenaisysandflowiversion2referees2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT jangjakobsson washinandwashoutofsevofluraneinatestlungmodelacomparisonbetweenaisysandflowiversion2referees2approved1approvedwithreservations
_version_ 1724742684970582016