Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Background: Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrati...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2017-04-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/6-389/v2 |
id |
doaj-4a004af9e08d40d7a704da97fed5371a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4a004af9e08d40d7a704da97fed5371a2020-11-25T02:49:33ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022017-04-01610.12688/f1000research.11255.212427Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]Petter Jakobsson0Madleine Lindgren1Jan G. Jakobsson2Faculty of Medicine, University of Lund, Lund, 221 00, SwedenDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyds University Hospital, Stockholm, 182 88 , SwedenDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyds University Hospital, Stockholm, 182 88 , SwedenBackground: Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrations in the circle system, thereby controlling the depth of anaesthesia. Methods: We studied the wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in the circle system with fixed fresh gas flow and vaporizer setting. We compared two modern anaesthesia work stations, the Aisys (GE, Madison, WI, USA) and FLOW-i (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) in a test lung model. Results: We found fresh-gas flow to have, as expected, a major influence on wash-in, as well as wash-out of sevoflurane. The wash-in time to reach a stable circle 1 MAC (2.1%) decreased from an average of 547 ± 83 seconds with a constant fresh gas flow of 300 ml/min and vaporizer setting of 8%, to a mean of 38 ± 6 seconds at a fresh gas flow of 4 L/min. There were only minor differences between the two works-stations tested; the Aisys was slightly faster at both 300 and 4 L/min flow. Time to further increase circle end-tidal concentration from 1-1.5 MAC showed likewise significant associations to fresh gas and decreased from 330 ± 24 seconds at 300 ml/min. to less than a minute at constant 4 L/min (17 ± 11 seconds), without anaesthetic machine difference. Wash-out was also fresh gas flow dependent and plateaued at 7.5 L/min. Conclusions: Circle system wash-in and wash-out show clear fresh gas dependency and varies somewhat between the Aisys and Flow-i. The circle saturation, reaching 1 MAC end-tidal or increasing from 1-1.5 MAC can be achieved with both work-stations within 1.5 minutes at a constant fresh gas flow of 2 and 4 L/min. Wash-out plateaued at 7.5 L/min.https://f1000research.com/articles/6-389/v2Technology & Monitoring in Anesthesiology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Petter Jakobsson Madleine Lindgren Jan G. Jakobsson |
spellingShingle |
Petter Jakobsson Madleine Lindgren Jan G. Jakobsson Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] F1000Research Technology & Monitoring in Anesthesiology |
author_facet |
Petter Jakobsson Madleine Lindgren Jan G. Jakobsson |
author_sort |
Petter Jakobsson |
title |
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
title_short |
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
title_full |
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
title_fullStr |
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
title_sort |
wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: a comparison between aisys and flow-i [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
publisher |
F1000 Research Ltd |
series |
F1000Research |
issn |
2046-1402 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Background: Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrations in the circle system, thereby controlling the depth of anaesthesia. Methods: We studied the wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in the circle system with fixed fresh gas flow and vaporizer setting. We compared two modern anaesthesia work stations, the Aisys (GE, Madison, WI, USA) and FLOW-i (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) in a test lung model. Results: We found fresh-gas flow to have, as expected, a major influence on wash-in, as well as wash-out of sevoflurane. The wash-in time to reach a stable circle 1 MAC (2.1%) decreased from an average of 547 ± 83 seconds with a constant fresh gas flow of 300 ml/min and vaporizer setting of 8%, to a mean of 38 ± 6 seconds at a fresh gas flow of 4 L/min. There were only minor differences between the two works-stations tested; the Aisys was slightly faster at both 300 and 4 L/min flow. Time to further increase circle end-tidal concentration from 1-1.5 MAC showed likewise significant associations to fresh gas and decreased from 330 ± 24 seconds at 300 ml/min. to less than a minute at constant 4 L/min (17 ± 11 seconds), without anaesthetic machine difference. Wash-out was also fresh gas flow dependent and plateaued at 7.5 L/min. Conclusions: Circle system wash-in and wash-out show clear fresh gas dependency and varies somewhat between the Aisys and Flow-i. The circle saturation, reaching 1 MAC end-tidal or increasing from 1-1.5 MAC can be achieved with both work-stations within 1.5 minutes at a constant fresh gas flow of 2 and 4 L/min. Wash-out plateaued at 7.5 L/min. |
topic |
Technology & Monitoring in Anesthesiology |
url |
https://f1000research.com/articles/6-389/v2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT petterjakobsson washinandwashoutofsevofluraneinatestlungmodelacomparisonbetweenaisysandflowiversion2referees2approved1approvedwithreservations AT madleinelindgren washinandwashoutofsevofluraneinatestlungmodelacomparisonbetweenaisysandflowiversion2referees2approved1approvedwithreservations AT jangjakobsson washinandwashoutofsevofluraneinatestlungmodelacomparisonbetweenaisysandflowiversion2referees2approved1approvedwithreservations |
_version_ |
1724742684970582016 |