Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madge Simon, Lamont Meon, Wittles Nadia, Dubois Vincent, Luck Jon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-11-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/6/36
id doaj-49f5c9c079c346f882cb8dc2e506e8b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49f5c9c079c346f882cb8dc2e506e8b12020-11-25T00:32:02ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152006-11-01613610.1186/1471-2415-6-36Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgeryMadge SimonLamont MeonWittles NadiaDubois VincentLuck Jon<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated instillations of drops (which is time-consuming for the nursing staff and uncomfortable for the patient).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A prospective randomised masked trial was conducted comprising 130 patients with no significant ocular history undergoing elective clear corneal phacoemulsification. 65 patients had mydriatic drops (Tropicamide 1%, Phenylephrine 2.5%, Diclofenac sodium 0.1%) instilled prior to surgery, 65 had a wick soaked in the same drop mixture placed in the inferior fornix. Horizontal pupil diameters were recorded on a millimetre scale immediately prior to surgery.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was no significant difference in pupil size between the two groups (p = 0.255, Student's t-test).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There was no significant difference between the mydriasis obtained with the depot system compared with conventional drop application. Use of a depot mydriatic delivery system appears to be a safe and efficient method of drug delivery.</p> <p><b>Trial Registration</b></p> <p>International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN78047760</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/6/36
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madge Simon
Lamont Meon
Wittles Nadia
Dubois Vincent
Luck Jon
spellingShingle Madge Simon
Lamont Meon
Wittles Nadia
Dubois Vincent
Luck Jon
Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
BMC Ophthalmology
author_facet Madge Simon
Lamont Meon
Wittles Nadia
Dubois Vincent
Luck Jon
author_sort Madge Simon
title Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_short Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_full Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_fullStr Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_sort randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
publisher BMC
series BMC Ophthalmology
issn 1471-2415
publishDate 2006-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated instillations of drops (which is time-consuming for the nursing staff and uncomfortable for the patient).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A prospective randomised masked trial was conducted comprising 130 patients with no significant ocular history undergoing elective clear corneal phacoemulsification. 65 patients had mydriatic drops (Tropicamide 1%, Phenylephrine 2.5%, Diclofenac sodium 0.1%) instilled prior to surgery, 65 had a wick soaked in the same drop mixture placed in the inferior fornix. Horizontal pupil diameters were recorded on a millimetre scale immediately prior to surgery.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was no significant difference in pupil size between the two groups (p = 0.255, Student's t-test).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There was no significant difference between the mydriasis obtained with the depot system compared with conventional drop application. Use of a depot mydriatic delivery system appears to be a safe and efficient method of drug delivery.</p> <p><b>Trial Registration</b></p> <p>International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN78047760</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/6/36
work_keys_str_mv AT madgesimon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
AT lamontmeon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
AT wittlesnadia randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
AT duboisvincent randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
AT luckjon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
_version_ 1725321267497664512