Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density

Within paratuberculosis control programs <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> subsp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected herds have to be detected with minimum effort but with sufficient reliability. We aimed to evaluate a combination of random sampling (RS) and pooling for the dete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annika Wichert, Esra Einax, Natalie Hahn, Anne Klassen, Karsten Donat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1605
id doaj-49f3ef6cc8c144d7ba1b06c5b9181055
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49f3ef6cc8c144d7ba1b06c5b91810552021-06-01T01:34:36ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-05-01111605160510.3390/ani11061605Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial DensityAnnika Wichert0Esra Einax1Natalie Hahn2Anne Klassen3Karsten Donat4Animal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, GermanyAnimal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, GermanyVeterinary Office, Johannesstraße 173, 99084 Erfurt, GermanyAnimal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, GermanyAnimal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, GermanyWithin paratuberculosis control programs <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> subsp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected herds have to be detected with minimum effort but with sufficient reliability. We aimed to evaluate a combination of random sampling (RS) and pooling for the detection of MAP-infected herds, simulating repeated RS in imitated dairy herds (within-herd prevalence 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.3%). Each RS consisted of taking 80 out of 300 pretested fecal samples, and five or ten samples were repeatedly and randomly pooled. All pools containing at least one MAP-positive sample were analyzed by culture and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The pool detection probability was 47.0% or 45.9% for pools of size 5 or 10 applying qPCR and slightly lower using culture. Combining these methods increased the pool detection probability. A positive association between bacterial density in pools and pool detection probability was identified by logistic regression. The herd-level detection probability ranged from 67.3% to 84.8% for pools of size 10 analyzed by both qPCR and culture. Pools of size 10 can be used without significant loss of sensitivity compared with pools of size 5. Analyzing randomly sampled and pooled fecal samples allows the detection of MAP-infected herds, but is not recommended for one-time testing in low prevalence herds.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1605Johne’s diseasescreeningpool sizerandom samplingherd level sensitivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annika Wichert
Esra Einax
Natalie Hahn
Anne Klassen
Karsten Donat
spellingShingle Annika Wichert
Esra Einax
Natalie Hahn
Anne Klassen
Karsten Donat
Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density
Animals
Johne’s disease
screening
pool size
random sampling
herd level sensitivity
author_facet Annika Wichert
Esra Einax
Natalie Hahn
Anne Klassen
Karsten Donat
author_sort Annika Wichert
title Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density
title_short Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density
title_full Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density
title_fullStr Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density
title_full_unstemmed Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density
title_sort detection of <i>mycobacterium avium</i> subspecies <i>paratuberculosis</i> in pooled fecal samples by fecal culture and real-time pcr in relation to bacterial density
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Within paratuberculosis control programs <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> subsp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected herds have to be detected with minimum effort but with sufficient reliability. We aimed to evaluate a combination of random sampling (RS) and pooling for the detection of MAP-infected herds, simulating repeated RS in imitated dairy herds (within-herd prevalence 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.3%). Each RS consisted of taking 80 out of 300 pretested fecal samples, and five or ten samples were repeatedly and randomly pooled. All pools containing at least one MAP-positive sample were analyzed by culture and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The pool detection probability was 47.0% or 45.9% for pools of size 5 or 10 applying qPCR and slightly lower using culture. Combining these methods increased the pool detection probability. A positive association between bacterial density in pools and pool detection probability was identified by logistic regression. The herd-level detection probability ranged from 67.3% to 84.8% for pools of size 10 analyzed by both qPCR and culture. Pools of size 10 can be used without significant loss of sensitivity compared with pools of size 5. Analyzing randomly sampled and pooled fecal samples allows the detection of MAP-infected herds, but is not recommended for one-time testing in low prevalence herds.
topic Johne’s disease
screening
pool size
random sampling
herd level sensitivity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1605
work_keys_str_mv AT annikawichert detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity
AT esraeinax detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity
AT nataliehahn detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity
AT anneklassen detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity
AT karstendonat detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity
_version_ 1721411993237192704