Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density
Within paratuberculosis control programs <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> subsp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected herds have to be detected with minimum effort but with sufficient reliability. We aimed to evaluate a combination of random sampling (RS) and pooling for the dete...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1605 |
id |
doaj-49f3ef6cc8c144d7ba1b06c5b9181055 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-49f3ef6cc8c144d7ba1b06c5b91810552021-06-01T01:34:36ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-05-01111605160510.3390/ani11061605Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial DensityAnnika Wichert0Esra Einax1Natalie Hahn2Anne Klassen3Karsten Donat4Animal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, GermanyAnimal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, GermanyVeterinary Office, Johannesstraße 173, 99084 Erfurt, GermanyAnimal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, GermanyAnimal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, GermanyWithin paratuberculosis control programs <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> subsp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected herds have to be detected with minimum effort but with sufficient reliability. We aimed to evaluate a combination of random sampling (RS) and pooling for the detection of MAP-infected herds, simulating repeated RS in imitated dairy herds (within-herd prevalence 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.3%). Each RS consisted of taking 80 out of 300 pretested fecal samples, and five or ten samples were repeatedly and randomly pooled. All pools containing at least one MAP-positive sample were analyzed by culture and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The pool detection probability was 47.0% or 45.9% for pools of size 5 or 10 applying qPCR and slightly lower using culture. Combining these methods increased the pool detection probability. A positive association between bacterial density in pools and pool detection probability was identified by logistic regression. The herd-level detection probability ranged from 67.3% to 84.8% for pools of size 10 analyzed by both qPCR and culture. Pools of size 10 can be used without significant loss of sensitivity compared with pools of size 5. Analyzing randomly sampled and pooled fecal samples allows the detection of MAP-infected herds, but is not recommended for one-time testing in low prevalence herds.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1605Johne’s diseasescreeningpool sizerandom samplingherd level sensitivity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Annika Wichert Esra Einax Natalie Hahn Anne Klassen Karsten Donat |
spellingShingle |
Annika Wichert Esra Einax Natalie Hahn Anne Klassen Karsten Donat Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density Animals Johne’s disease screening pool size random sampling herd level sensitivity |
author_facet |
Annika Wichert Esra Einax Natalie Hahn Anne Klassen Karsten Donat |
author_sort |
Annika Wichert |
title |
Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density |
title_short |
Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density |
title_full |
Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density |
title_fullStr |
Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density |
title_full_unstemmed |
Detection of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Subspecies <i>Paratuberculosis</i> in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density |
title_sort |
detection of <i>mycobacterium avium</i> subspecies <i>paratuberculosis</i> in pooled fecal samples by fecal culture and real-time pcr in relation to bacterial density |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Animals |
issn |
2076-2615 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Within paratuberculosis control programs <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> subsp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected herds have to be detected with minimum effort but with sufficient reliability. We aimed to evaluate a combination of random sampling (RS) and pooling for the detection of MAP-infected herds, simulating repeated RS in imitated dairy herds (within-herd prevalence 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.3%). Each RS consisted of taking 80 out of 300 pretested fecal samples, and five or ten samples were repeatedly and randomly pooled. All pools containing at least one MAP-positive sample were analyzed by culture and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The pool detection probability was 47.0% or 45.9% for pools of size 5 or 10 applying qPCR and slightly lower using culture. Combining these methods increased the pool detection probability. A positive association between bacterial density in pools and pool detection probability was identified by logistic regression. The herd-level detection probability ranged from 67.3% to 84.8% for pools of size 10 analyzed by both qPCR and culture. Pools of size 10 can be used without significant loss of sensitivity compared with pools of size 5. Analyzing randomly sampled and pooled fecal samples allows the detection of MAP-infected herds, but is not recommended for one-time testing in low prevalence herds. |
topic |
Johne’s disease screening pool size random sampling herd level sensitivity |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1605 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annikawichert detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity AT esraeinax detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity AT nataliehahn detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity AT anneklassen detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity AT karstendonat detectionofimycobacteriumaviumisubspeciesiparatuberculosisiinpooledfecalsamplesbyfecalcultureandrealtimepcrinrelationtobacterialdensity |
_version_ |
1721411993237192704 |