Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands
A major after-use option for former peat harvesting areas has been afforestation. The profitability of afforestation with Scots pine trees ( L.) was studied in two 31â32-year old experiments in southern and northern Finland. The stands were established by seeding and planting, and various...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Finnish Society of Forest Science
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Silva Fennica |
Online Access: | https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/10273 |
id |
doaj-49e8eb52dc974d499c7e8c157d8b8701 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-49e8eb52dc974d499c7e8c157d8b87012020-11-25T03:56:02ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752020-01-0154310.14214/sf.10273Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlandsAro, LasseAhtikoski, AnssiHytönen, Jyrki A major after-use option for former peat harvesting areas has been afforestation. The profitability of afforestation with Scots pine trees ( L.) was studied in two 31â32-year old experiments in southern and northern Finland. The stands were established by seeding and planting, and various fertilization treatments and drainage intensities were tested. The financial performance for each plot was assessed in three steps. First, the costs occurred during the measurement time were summed up according to their present value. Then, for the rest of the rotation (i.e., from the age of 31/32 onwards) the stand management was optimized in order to maximize the net present value (MaxNPV). Finally, bare land values (BLVs) were calculated by summing up the present value of costs and the MaxNPV and converting the sum of the series into infinity. The afforestation method did not affect the mean annual increment (MAI; 9.2â9.5 m ha a) in the southern experiment. In the northern experiment the afforestation method, ditch spacing and fertilization had significant effects on the MAI of the stands. The average MAI of the planted pines was 8.9 m ha a, and for seeded pines it was 7.5 m ha a. The BLV at an interest rate of 3% was positive for all stands in both regions. In the northern region afforestation method, ditch spacing and fertilization also had a significant effect on the BLV. When the interest rate was 5%, almost two thirds of the stands had a negative BLV in both regions.Pinus sylvestris3â1â13â1â13â1â1https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/10273 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aro, Lasse Ahtikoski, Anssi Hytönen, Jyrki |
spellingShingle |
Aro, Lasse Ahtikoski, Anssi Hytönen, Jyrki Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands Silva Fennica |
author_facet |
Aro, Lasse Ahtikoski, Anssi Hytönen, Jyrki |
author_sort |
Aro, Lasse |
title |
Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands |
title_short |
Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands |
title_full |
Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands |
title_fullStr |
Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands |
title_full_unstemmed |
Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands |
title_sort |
profitability of growing scots pine on cutaway peatlands |
publisher |
Finnish Society of Forest Science |
series |
Silva Fennica |
issn |
2242-4075 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
A major after-use option for former peat harvesting areas has been afforestation. The profitability of afforestation with Scots pine trees ( L.) was studied in two 31â32-year old experiments in southern and northern Finland. The stands were established by seeding and planting, and various fertilization treatments and drainage intensities were tested. The financial performance for each plot was assessed in three steps. First, the costs occurred during the measurement time were summed up according to their present value. Then, for the rest of the rotation (i.e., from the age of 31/32 onwards) the stand management was optimized in order to maximize the net present value (MaxNPV). Finally, bare land values (BLVs) were calculated by summing up the present value of costs and the MaxNPV and converting the sum of the series into infinity. The afforestation method did not affect the mean annual increment (MAI; 9.2â9.5 m ha a) in the southern experiment. In the northern experiment the afforestation method, ditch spacing and fertilization had significant effects on the MAI of the stands. The average MAI of the planted pines was 8.9 m ha a, and for seeded pines it was 7.5 m ha a. The BLV at an interest rate of 3% was positive for all stands in both regions. In the northern region afforestation method, ditch spacing and fertilization also had a significant effect on the BLV. When the interest rate was 5%, almost two thirds of the stands had a negative BLV in both regions.Pinus sylvestris3â1â13â1â13â1â1 |
url |
https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/10273 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arolasse profitabilityofgrowingscotspineoncutawaypeatlands AT ahtikoskianssi profitabilityofgrowingscotspineoncutawaypeatlands AT hytonenjyrki profitabilityofgrowingscotspineoncutawaypeatlands |
_version_ |
1724466607038660608 |