Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands

A major after-use option for former peat harvesting areas has been afforestation. The profitability of afforestation with Scots pine trees ( L.) was studied in two 31â32-year old experiments in southern and northern Finland. The stands were established by seeding and planting, and various...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aro, Lasse, Ahtikoski, Anssi, Hytönen, Jyrki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2020-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/10273
id doaj-49e8eb52dc974d499c7e8c157d8b8701
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49e8eb52dc974d499c7e8c157d8b87012020-11-25T03:56:02ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752020-01-0154310.14214/sf.10273Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlandsAro, LasseAhtikoski, AnssiHytönen, Jyrki A major after-use option for former peat harvesting areas has been afforestation. The profitability of afforestation with Scots pine trees ( L.) was studied in two 31â32-year old experiments in southern and northern Finland. The stands were established by seeding and planting, and various fertilization treatments and drainage intensities were tested. The financial performance for each plot was assessed in three steps. First, the costs occurred during the measurement time were summed up according to their present value. Then, for the rest of the rotation (i.e., from the age of 31/32 onwards) the stand management was optimized in order to maximize the net present value (MaxNPV). Finally, bare land values (BLVs) were calculated by summing up the present value of costs and the MaxNPV and converting the sum of the series into infinity. The afforestation method did not affect the mean annual increment (MAI; 9.2â9.5 m ha a) in the southern experiment. In the northern experiment the afforestation method, ditch spacing and fertilization had significant effects on the MAI of the stands. The average MAI of the planted pines was 8.9 m ha a, and for seeded pines it was 7.5 m ha a. The BLV at an interest rate of 3% was positive for all stands in both regions. In the northern region afforestation method, ditch spacing and fertilization also had a significant effect on the BLV. When the interest rate was 5%, almost two thirds of the stands had a negative BLV in both regions.Pinus sylvestris3â1â13â1â13â1â1https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/10273
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aro, Lasse
Ahtikoski, Anssi
Hytönen, Jyrki
spellingShingle Aro, Lasse
Ahtikoski, Anssi
Hytönen, Jyrki
Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands
Silva Fennica
author_facet Aro, Lasse
Ahtikoski, Anssi
Hytönen, Jyrki
author_sort Aro, Lasse
title Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands
title_short Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands
title_full Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands
title_fullStr Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands
title_full_unstemmed Profitability of growing Scots pine on cutaway peatlands
title_sort profitability of growing scots pine on cutaway peatlands
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2020-01-01
description A major after-use option for former peat harvesting areas has been afforestation. The profitability of afforestation with Scots pine trees ( L.) was studied in two 31â32-year old experiments in southern and northern Finland. The stands were established by seeding and planting, and various fertilization treatments and drainage intensities were tested. The financial performance for each plot was assessed in three steps. First, the costs occurred during the measurement time were summed up according to their present value. Then, for the rest of the rotation (i.e., from the age of 31/32 onwards) the stand management was optimized in order to maximize the net present value (MaxNPV). Finally, bare land values (BLVs) were calculated by summing up the present value of costs and the MaxNPV and converting the sum of the series into infinity. The afforestation method did not affect the mean annual increment (MAI; 9.2â9.5 m ha a) in the southern experiment. In the northern experiment the afforestation method, ditch spacing and fertilization had significant effects on the MAI of the stands. The average MAI of the planted pines was 8.9 m ha a, and for seeded pines it was 7.5 m ha a. The BLV at an interest rate of 3% was positive for all stands in both regions. In the northern region afforestation method, ditch spacing and fertilization also had a significant effect on the BLV. When the interest rate was 5%, almost two thirds of the stands had a negative BLV in both regions.Pinus sylvestris3â1â13â1â13â1â1
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/10273
work_keys_str_mv AT arolasse profitabilityofgrowingscotspineoncutawaypeatlands
AT ahtikoskianssi profitabilityofgrowingscotspineoncutawaypeatlands
AT hytonenjyrki profitabilityofgrowingscotspineoncutawaypeatlands
_version_ 1724466607038660608