Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Curves

Annual maximum daily rainfalls will change in the future because of climate change, according to climate projections provided by EURO-CORDEX. This study aims at understanding how the expected changes in precipitation extremes will affect the flood behavior in the future. Hydrological modeling is req...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Enrique Soriano, Luis Mediero, Carlos Garijo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/7/1/14
id doaj-49c353069b2f435fabb63a4deb9cb807
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49c353069b2f435fabb63a4deb9cb8072020-11-25T02:16:31ZengMDPI AGProceedings2504-39002019-03-01711410.3390/ECWS-3-05809ECWS-3-05809Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency CurvesEnrique Soriano0Luis Mediero1Carlos Garijo2Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Department of Civil Engineering Hydraulic, Energy and Environment, Campus Ciudad Universitaria, Calle del Prof. Aranguren, 3, 28040 Madrid, SpainUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid, Department of Civil Engineering Hydraulic, Energy and Environment, Campus Ciudad Universitaria, Calle del Prof. Aranguren, 3, 28040 Madrid, SpainUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid, Department of Civil Engineering Hydraulic, Energy and Environment, Campus Ciudad Universitaria, Calle del Prof. Aranguren, 3, 28040 Madrid, SpainAnnual maximum daily rainfalls will change in the future because of climate change, according to climate projections provided by EURO-CORDEX. This study aims at understanding how the expected changes in precipitation extremes will affect the flood behavior in the future. Hydrological modeling is required to characterize the rainfall-runoff process adequately in a changing climate to estimate flood changes. Precipitation and temperature projections given by climate models in the control period usually do not fit the observations in the same period exactly from a statistical point of view. To correct such errors, bias correction methods are used. This paper aims at finding the most adequate bias correction method for both temperature and precipitation projections, minimizing the errors between observed and simulated precipitation and flood frequency curves. Four catchments located in central western Spain have been selected as case studies. The HBV hydrological model has been calibrated, using the observed precipitation, temperature, and streamflow data available at a daily scale. Expected changes in precipitation extremes are usually smoothed by the reduction of soil moisture content due to expected increases in temperatures and decreases in mean annual precipitation. Consequently, rainfall is the most significant input to the model and polynomial quantile mapping is the best bias correction method.http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/7/1/14Bias CorrectionQuantile MappingClimate ChangeFloodsCORDEX
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Enrique Soriano
Luis Mediero
Carlos Garijo
spellingShingle Enrique Soriano
Luis Mediero
Carlos Garijo
Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Curves
Proceedings
Bias Correction
Quantile Mapping
Climate Change
Floods
CORDEX
author_facet Enrique Soriano
Luis Mediero
Carlos Garijo
author_sort Enrique Soriano
title Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Curves
title_short Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Curves
title_full Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Curves
title_fullStr Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Curves
title_full_unstemmed Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Curves
title_sort selection of bias correction methods to assess the impact of climate change on flood frequency curves
publisher MDPI AG
series Proceedings
issn 2504-3900
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Annual maximum daily rainfalls will change in the future because of climate change, according to climate projections provided by EURO-CORDEX. This study aims at understanding how the expected changes in precipitation extremes will affect the flood behavior in the future. Hydrological modeling is required to characterize the rainfall-runoff process adequately in a changing climate to estimate flood changes. Precipitation and temperature projections given by climate models in the control period usually do not fit the observations in the same period exactly from a statistical point of view. To correct such errors, bias correction methods are used. This paper aims at finding the most adequate bias correction method for both temperature and precipitation projections, minimizing the errors between observed and simulated precipitation and flood frequency curves. Four catchments located in central western Spain have been selected as case studies. The HBV hydrological model has been calibrated, using the observed precipitation, temperature, and streamflow data available at a daily scale. Expected changes in precipitation extremes are usually smoothed by the reduction of soil moisture content due to expected increases in temperatures and decreases in mean annual precipitation. Consequently, rainfall is the most significant input to the model and polynomial quantile mapping is the best bias correction method.
topic Bias Correction
Quantile Mapping
Climate Change
Floods
CORDEX
url http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/7/1/14
work_keys_str_mv AT enriquesoriano selectionofbiascorrectionmethodstoassesstheimpactofclimatechangeonfloodfrequencycurves
AT luismediero selectionofbiascorrectionmethodstoassesstheimpactofclimatechangeonfloodfrequencycurves
AT carlosgarijo selectionofbiascorrectionmethodstoassesstheimpactofclimatechangeonfloodfrequencycurves
_version_ 1724890752432996352