What is at stake? Practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.

Efforts to include a broader set of actors, knowledges and values in environmental decision-making have been promoted as a key remedy to technocratic decision-making and environmental degradation, and as instrumental for better decisions and democratic empowerment. Yet, such inclusive efforts yield...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Linda Soneryd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 2015-12-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies
Online Access:http://www.nordicsts.org/index.php?journal=njsts&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=Soneryd
id doaj-499b91f032e24a29943e4470c75db807
record_format Article
spelling doaj-499b91f032e24a29943e4470c75db8072020-11-24T22:33:38ZengNordic Journal of Science and Technology StudiesNordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies1894-46471894-46472015-12-01321823 What is at stake? Practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.Linda SonerydEfforts to include a broader set of actors, knowledges and values in environmental decision-making have been promoted as a key remedy to technocratic decision-making and environmental degradation, and as instrumental for better decisions and democratic empowerment. Yet, such inclusive efforts yield uncertain results and entail various theoretical and practical problems, not least when environmental problems are increasingly complex and transgress political-geographic boundaries. We therefore need to take a step back from the normative presupposition that public involvement will enhance environmental governance with a more agnostic approach to its outcomes in terms of legitimate actors and issues: How are alliances created between issues and actors in relation to specific problems? How are stakes recognized as legitimate and tied to specific groups of actors and scales? What is the relation between governments’ inclusive approaches and visions of socio-technical progress and alternative socio-technical imaginaries of the future? This paper will discuss the contributions in this special issue in relation to these questions. The examples brought up by the authors can all be seen as practices in which legitimate participants and stakes are made real and with various scaling effects and possible futures as a result. http://www.nordicsts.org/index.php?journal=njsts&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=Soneryd
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Linda Soneryd
spellingShingle Linda Soneryd
What is at stake? Practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.
Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies
author_facet Linda Soneryd
author_sort Linda Soneryd
title What is at stake? Practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.
title_short What is at stake? Practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.
title_full What is at stake? Practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.
title_fullStr What is at stake? Practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.
title_full_unstemmed What is at stake? Practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.
title_sort what is at stake? practices of linking actors, issues and scales in environmental politics.
publisher Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies
series Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies
issn 1894-4647
1894-4647
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Efforts to include a broader set of actors, knowledges and values in environmental decision-making have been promoted as a key remedy to technocratic decision-making and environmental degradation, and as instrumental for better decisions and democratic empowerment. Yet, such inclusive efforts yield uncertain results and entail various theoretical and practical problems, not least when environmental problems are increasingly complex and transgress political-geographic boundaries. We therefore need to take a step back from the normative presupposition that public involvement will enhance environmental governance with a more agnostic approach to its outcomes in terms of legitimate actors and issues: How are alliances created between issues and actors in relation to specific problems? How are stakes recognized as legitimate and tied to specific groups of actors and scales? What is the relation between governments’ inclusive approaches and visions of socio-technical progress and alternative socio-technical imaginaries of the future? This paper will discuss the contributions in this special issue in relation to these questions. The examples brought up by the authors can all be seen as practices in which legitimate participants and stakes are made real and with various scaling effects and possible futures as a result.
url http://www.nordicsts.org/index.php?journal=njsts&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=Soneryd
work_keys_str_mv AT lindasoneryd whatisatstakepracticesoflinkingactorsissuesandscalesinenvironmentalpolitics
_version_ 1725730221888372736