Understanding the Environmental Study Life Cycle in the United States Hydropower Licensing and Federal Authorization Process

We analyzed United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) documents prepared for 29 recently licensed hydropower projects and created two novel datasets to improve understanding of the environmental study life cycle, defined here as the process that begins with an environmental study bei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew S. P. Aldrovandi, Esther S. Parish, Brenda M. Pracheil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3435
id doaj-4987cef8e15a48cda26857fedb76214b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4987cef8e15a48cda26857fedb76214b2021-06-30T23:50:58ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-06-01143435343510.3390/en14123435Understanding the Environmental Study Life Cycle in the United States Hydropower Licensing and Federal Authorization ProcessMatthew S. P. Aldrovandi0Esther S. Parish1Brenda M. Pracheil2Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USAEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USAEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USAWe analyzed United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) documents prepared for 29 recently licensed hydropower projects and created two novel datasets to improve understanding of the environmental study life cycle, defined here as the process that begins with an environmental study being requested by a hydropower stakeholder or regulator, and ends with the study either being rejected or approved/conducted. Our two datasets consisted of summaries of information taken from (1), study determination letters prepared by FERC for 23 projects that were using the integrated licensing process, and (2), environmental study submittals and issuances tracked and attributed to seven projects using the FERC record. Our objective was to use the two resulting environmental life cycle datasets to understand which types of environmental studies are approved, rejected, and implemented during FERC licensing, and how consistently those types of studies are required across multiple hydropower projects. We matched the requested studies to a set of 61 river function indicators in eight categories and found that studies related to the category of biota and biodiversity were requested most often across all 29 projects. Within that category, studies related to river function indicators of presence, absence, detection of species and habitat/critical habitat were the most important to stakeholders, based on the relative number of studies requested. The study approval, rejection, and request rates were similar within each dataset, although the 23 projects with study determination letters had many rejected studies, whereas the dataset created from the seven projects had very few rejected studies.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3435hydropowerhydropower regulationenvironmental impact
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew S. P. Aldrovandi
Esther S. Parish
Brenda M. Pracheil
spellingShingle Matthew S. P. Aldrovandi
Esther S. Parish
Brenda M. Pracheil
Understanding the Environmental Study Life Cycle in the United States Hydropower Licensing and Federal Authorization Process
Energies
hydropower
hydropower regulation
environmental impact
author_facet Matthew S. P. Aldrovandi
Esther S. Parish
Brenda M. Pracheil
author_sort Matthew S. P. Aldrovandi
title Understanding the Environmental Study Life Cycle in the United States Hydropower Licensing and Federal Authorization Process
title_short Understanding the Environmental Study Life Cycle in the United States Hydropower Licensing and Federal Authorization Process
title_full Understanding the Environmental Study Life Cycle in the United States Hydropower Licensing and Federal Authorization Process
title_fullStr Understanding the Environmental Study Life Cycle in the United States Hydropower Licensing and Federal Authorization Process
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Environmental Study Life Cycle in the United States Hydropower Licensing and Federal Authorization Process
title_sort understanding the environmental study life cycle in the united states hydropower licensing and federal authorization process
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2021-06-01
description We analyzed United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) documents prepared for 29 recently licensed hydropower projects and created two novel datasets to improve understanding of the environmental study life cycle, defined here as the process that begins with an environmental study being requested by a hydropower stakeholder or regulator, and ends with the study either being rejected or approved/conducted. Our two datasets consisted of summaries of information taken from (1), study determination letters prepared by FERC for 23 projects that were using the integrated licensing process, and (2), environmental study submittals and issuances tracked and attributed to seven projects using the FERC record. Our objective was to use the two resulting environmental life cycle datasets to understand which types of environmental studies are approved, rejected, and implemented during FERC licensing, and how consistently those types of studies are required across multiple hydropower projects. We matched the requested studies to a set of 61 river function indicators in eight categories and found that studies related to the category of biota and biodiversity were requested most often across all 29 projects. Within that category, studies related to river function indicators of presence, absence, detection of species and habitat/critical habitat were the most important to stakeholders, based on the relative number of studies requested. The study approval, rejection, and request rates were similar within each dataset, although the 23 projects with study determination letters had many rejected studies, whereas the dataset created from the seven projects had very few rejected studies.
topic hydropower
hydropower regulation
environmental impact
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3435
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewspaldrovandi understandingtheenvironmentalstudylifecycleintheunitedstateshydropowerlicensingandfederalauthorizationprocess
AT esthersparish understandingtheenvironmentalstudylifecycleintheunitedstateshydropowerlicensingandfederalauthorizationprocess
AT brendampracheil understandingtheenvironmentalstudylifecycleintheunitedstateshydropowerlicensingandfederalauthorizationprocess
_version_ 1721350312472608768