Stuttering Intervention in Three Service Delivery Models (Direct, Hybrid, and Telepractice): Two Case Studies

<p class="AbstractBodyText">This study assessed outcomes in stuttering intervention across three service delivery models: direct, hybrid, and telepractice for two 11-year old children who stutter. The goal of the study was to investigate whether short-term goals were maintained throu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel T. Valentine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2015-01-01
Series:International Journal of Telerehabilitation
Online Access:http://telerehab.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/Telerehab/article/view/6154
id doaj-4980ee2d9a894315915c7cb3c592a5c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4980ee2d9a894315915c7cb3c592a5c42020-11-24T22:51:10ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghInternational Journal of Telerehabilitation1945-20202015-01-0162516410.5195/ijt.2014.61545971Stuttering Intervention in Three Service Delivery Models (Direct, Hybrid, and Telepractice): Two Case StudiesDaniel T. Valentine0University of Montevallo<p class="AbstractBodyText">This study assessed outcomes in stuttering intervention across three service delivery models: direct, hybrid, and telepractice for two 11-year old children who stutter. The goal of the study was to investigate whether short-term goals were maintained through the telepractice sessions. The Stuttering Severity Instrument, Fourth Edition (SSI-4) was administered to each child before and after each intervention period and weekly fluency samples (percentage of stuttered syllables in a monologue) were obtained in each of the 10-week intervention periods. In addition, the Communication Attitudes Test-Revised was used to assess the children’s attitudes toward speaking. Following the telepractice period, parents and children completed a questionnaire concerning the therapy experience via telepractice. Both children continued to improve fluency as measured by the weekly fluency samples. SSI-4 severity ratings improved for one child and remained consistent for the other. These outcomes appear to demonstrate that telepractice is viable for improving and maintaining fluency.</p>http://telerehab.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/Telerehab/article/view/6154
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel T. Valentine
spellingShingle Daniel T. Valentine
Stuttering Intervention in Three Service Delivery Models (Direct, Hybrid, and Telepractice): Two Case Studies
International Journal of Telerehabilitation
author_facet Daniel T. Valentine
author_sort Daniel T. Valentine
title Stuttering Intervention in Three Service Delivery Models (Direct, Hybrid, and Telepractice): Two Case Studies
title_short Stuttering Intervention in Three Service Delivery Models (Direct, Hybrid, and Telepractice): Two Case Studies
title_full Stuttering Intervention in Three Service Delivery Models (Direct, Hybrid, and Telepractice): Two Case Studies
title_fullStr Stuttering Intervention in Three Service Delivery Models (Direct, Hybrid, and Telepractice): Two Case Studies
title_full_unstemmed Stuttering Intervention in Three Service Delivery Models (Direct, Hybrid, and Telepractice): Two Case Studies
title_sort stuttering intervention in three service delivery models (direct, hybrid, and telepractice): two case studies
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series International Journal of Telerehabilitation
issn 1945-2020
publishDate 2015-01-01
description <p class="AbstractBodyText">This study assessed outcomes in stuttering intervention across three service delivery models: direct, hybrid, and telepractice for two 11-year old children who stutter. The goal of the study was to investigate whether short-term goals were maintained through the telepractice sessions. The Stuttering Severity Instrument, Fourth Edition (SSI-4) was administered to each child before and after each intervention period and weekly fluency samples (percentage of stuttered syllables in a monologue) were obtained in each of the 10-week intervention periods. In addition, the Communication Attitudes Test-Revised was used to assess the children’s attitudes toward speaking. Following the telepractice period, parents and children completed a questionnaire concerning the therapy experience via telepractice. Both children continued to improve fluency as measured by the weekly fluency samples. SSI-4 severity ratings improved for one child and remained consistent for the other. These outcomes appear to demonstrate that telepractice is viable for improving and maintaining fluency.</p>
url http://telerehab.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/Telerehab/article/view/6154
work_keys_str_mv AT danieltvalentine stutteringinterventioninthreeservicedeliverymodelsdirecthybridandtelepracticetwocasestudies
_version_ 1725671041043267584