Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression Modeling

This paper has three goals: (1) to document the factors shaping is-contraction in Mainstream American English; (2) to assess the extent to which these factors also shape contraction of has; (3) to use shared patterns of contraction across the two verbs to draw conclusions about how the varying forms...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laurel MacKenzie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00058/full
id doaj-497d843f9dba4a8dbdbf413d07bd78c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-497d843f9dba4a8dbdbf413d07bd78c42020-11-25T02:59:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence2624-82122020-08-01310.3389/frai.2020.00058563398Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression ModelingLaurel MacKenzieThis paper has three goals: (1) to document the factors shaping is-contraction in Mainstream American English; (2) to assess the extent to which these factors also shape contraction of has; (3) to use shared patterns of contraction across the two verbs to draw conclusions about how the varying forms are represented grammatically. While is has two distinct phonological forms in variation, has has three. This necessitates regression modeling which can handle non-binary response variables; I use Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo modeling. Through this modeling, I (1) uncover a number of novel predictors shaping contraction of is, and (2) demonstrate that many of the patterns shown by is are also in evidence for has. I also (3) argue that modeling has-variation as the product of two stages of binary choices—a common treatment of three-way variation in variationist sociolinguistics—cannot adequately explain the quantitative patterns, which are only compatible with a grammatical model under which three distinct forms vary with each other. The findings have theoretical and methodological consequences for sociolinguistic work on ternary variables.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00058/fullcontractionEnglishcopulalinguistic variableBayesian modelingmultinomial regression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laurel MacKenzie
spellingShingle Laurel MacKenzie
Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression Modeling
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
contraction
English
copula
linguistic variable
Bayesian modeling
multinomial regression
author_facet Laurel MacKenzie
author_sort Laurel MacKenzie
title Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression Modeling
title_short Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression Modeling
title_full Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression Modeling
title_fullStr Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression Modeling
title_sort comparing constraints on contraction using bayesian regression modeling
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
issn 2624-8212
publishDate 2020-08-01
description This paper has three goals: (1) to document the factors shaping is-contraction in Mainstream American English; (2) to assess the extent to which these factors also shape contraction of has; (3) to use shared patterns of contraction across the two verbs to draw conclusions about how the varying forms are represented grammatically. While is has two distinct phonological forms in variation, has has three. This necessitates regression modeling which can handle non-binary response variables; I use Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo modeling. Through this modeling, I (1) uncover a number of novel predictors shaping contraction of is, and (2) demonstrate that many of the patterns shown by is are also in evidence for has. I also (3) argue that modeling has-variation as the product of two stages of binary choices—a common treatment of three-way variation in variationist sociolinguistics—cannot adequately explain the quantitative patterns, which are only compatible with a grammatical model under which three distinct forms vary with each other. The findings have theoretical and methodological consequences for sociolinguistic work on ternary variables.
topic contraction
English
copula
linguistic variable
Bayesian modeling
multinomial regression
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00058/full
work_keys_str_mv AT laurelmackenzie comparingconstraintsoncontractionusingbayesianregressionmodeling
_version_ 1724702409790324736