Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study
Aims: Within the past few years, there has been tremendous growth in clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Unlike those of many small-molecule pharmaceuticals, CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials are fraught with risks due to the use of live cell products. The aim of th...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920966574 |
id |
doaj-49753efa9ebe48eab508b4ea3b40a362 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-49753efa9ebe48eab508b4ea3b40a3622020-11-25T03:57:32ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology1758-83592020-10-011210.1177/1758835920966574Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi studyWeijia WuYan HuoXueying DingYuhong ZhouShengying GuYuan GaoAims: Within the past few years, there has been tremendous growth in clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Unlike those of many small-molecule pharmaceuticals, CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials are fraught with risks due to the use of live cell products. The aim of this study is to reach a consensus with experts on the most relevant set of risks that practically occur in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials. Methods: A Delphi method of consensus development was used to identify the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials, comprising three survey rounds. The expert panel consisted of principal investigators, clinical research physicians, members of institutional ethics committees, and Good Clinical Practice managers. Results: Of the 24 experts invited to participate in this Delphi study, 20 participants completed Round 1, Round 2, and Round 3. Finally, consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was achieved for 54 risks relating to CAR T-cell clinical trials. Effective interventions related to these risks are needed to ensure the proper protection of subject health and safety. Conclusion: The Delphi method was successful in gaining a consensus on risks relevant to CAR T-cell clinical trials in a geographically diverse expert association. It is hoped that this work can benefit future risk-based quality management in clinical trials and can potentially promote the better development of CAR T-cell therapy products.https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920966574 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Weijia Wu Yan Huo Xueying Ding Yuhong Zhou Shengying Gu Yuan Gao |
spellingShingle |
Weijia Wu Yan Huo Xueying Ding Yuhong Zhou Shengying Gu Yuan Gao Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology |
author_facet |
Weijia Wu Yan Huo Xueying Ding Yuhong Zhou Shengying Gu Yuan Gao |
author_sort |
Weijia Wu |
title |
Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study |
title_short |
Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study |
title_full |
Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study |
title_fullStr |
Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study |
title_sort |
identification of the risks in car t-cell therapy clinical trials in china: a delphi study |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology |
issn |
1758-8359 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Aims: Within the past few years, there has been tremendous growth in clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Unlike those of many small-molecule pharmaceuticals, CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials are fraught with risks due to the use of live cell products. The aim of this study is to reach a consensus with experts on the most relevant set of risks that practically occur in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials. Methods: A Delphi method of consensus development was used to identify the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials, comprising three survey rounds. The expert panel consisted of principal investigators, clinical research physicians, members of institutional ethics committees, and Good Clinical Practice managers. Results: Of the 24 experts invited to participate in this Delphi study, 20 participants completed Round 1, Round 2, and Round 3. Finally, consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was achieved for 54 risks relating to CAR T-cell clinical trials. Effective interventions related to these risks are needed to ensure the proper protection of subject health and safety. Conclusion: The Delphi method was successful in gaining a consensus on risks relevant to CAR T-cell clinical trials in a geographically diverse expert association. It is hoped that this work can benefit future risk-based quality management in clinical trials and can potentially promote the better development of CAR T-cell therapy products. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920966574 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT weijiawu identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy AT yanhuo identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy AT xueyingding identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy AT yuhongzhou identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy AT shengyinggu identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy AT yuangao identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy |
_version_ |
1724460268671467520 |