Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study

Aims: Within the past few years, there has been tremendous growth in clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Unlike those of many small-molecule pharmaceuticals, CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials are fraught with risks due to the use of live cell products. The aim of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weijia Wu, Yan Huo, Xueying Ding, Yuhong Zhou, Shengying Gu, Yuan Gao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-10-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920966574
id doaj-49753efa9ebe48eab508b4ea3b40a362
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49753efa9ebe48eab508b4ea3b40a3622020-11-25T03:57:32ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology1758-83592020-10-011210.1177/1758835920966574Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi studyWeijia WuYan HuoXueying DingYuhong ZhouShengying GuYuan GaoAims: Within the past few years, there has been tremendous growth in clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Unlike those of many small-molecule pharmaceuticals, CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials are fraught with risks due to the use of live cell products. The aim of this study is to reach a consensus with experts on the most relevant set of risks that practically occur in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials. Methods: A Delphi method of consensus development was used to identify the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials, comprising three survey rounds. The expert panel consisted of principal investigators, clinical research physicians, members of institutional ethics committees, and Good Clinical Practice managers. Results: Of the 24 experts invited to participate in this Delphi study, 20 participants completed Round 1, Round 2, and Round 3. Finally, consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was achieved for 54 risks relating to CAR T-cell clinical trials. Effective interventions related to these risks are needed to ensure the proper protection of subject health and safety. Conclusion: The Delphi method was successful in gaining a consensus on risks relevant to CAR T-cell clinical trials in a geographically diverse expert association. It is hoped that this work can benefit future risk-based quality management in clinical trials and can potentially promote the better development of CAR T-cell therapy products.https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920966574
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Weijia Wu
Yan Huo
Xueying Ding
Yuhong Zhou
Shengying Gu
Yuan Gao
spellingShingle Weijia Wu
Yan Huo
Xueying Ding
Yuhong Zhou
Shengying Gu
Yuan Gao
Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
author_facet Weijia Wu
Yan Huo
Xueying Ding
Yuhong Zhou
Shengying Gu
Yuan Gao
author_sort Weijia Wu
title Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study
title_short Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study
title_full Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study
title_fullStr Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study
title_sort identification of the risks in car t-cell therapy clinical trials in china: a delphi study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
issn 1758-8359
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Aims: Within the past few years, there has been tremendous growth in clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Unlike those of many small-molecule pharmaceuticals, CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials are fraught with risks due to the use of live cell products. The aim of this study is to reach a consensus with experts on the most relevant set of risks that practically occur in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials. Methods: A Delphi method of consensus development was used to identify the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials, comprising three survey rounds. The expert panel consisted of principal investigators, clinical research physicians, members of institutional ethics committees, and Good Clinical Practice managers. Results: Of the 24 experts invited to participate in this Delphi study, 20 participants completed Round 1, Round 2, and Round 3. Finally, consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was achieved for 54 risks relating to CAR T-cell clinical trials. Effective interventions related to these risks are needed to ensure the proper protection of subject health and safety. Conclusion: The Delphi method was successful in gaining a consensus on risks relevant to CAR T-cell clinical trials in a geographically diverse expert association. It is hoped that this work can benefit future risk-based quality management in clinical trials and can potentially promote the better development of CAR T-cell therapy products.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920966574
work_keys_str_mv AT weijiawu identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy
AT yanhuo identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy
AT xueyingding identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy
AT yuhongzhou identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy
AT shengyinggu identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy
AT yuangao identificationoftherisksincartcelltherapyclinicaltrialsinchinaadelphistudy
_version_ 1724460268671467520