Institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource management

The Philippine Local Government Code provides the basis for local natural resources management. This Code which was enacted into Law in 1991, however, is not necessarily the driving force for many Local Government Units (LGU’s) who have made breakthroughs in local natural resources management (NRM)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herminia C. Tanguilig, Valerio C. Tanguilig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut Veolia Environnement 2010-09-01
Series:Field Actions Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/275
id doaj-496f2260b7cd407e9e7fae56ff3fd55f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-496f2260b7cd407e9e7fae56ff3fd55f2020-11-25T00:00:45ZengInstitut Veolia EnvironnementField Actions Science Reports1867-139X1867-85212010-09-01Institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource managementHerminia C. TanguiligValerio C. TanguiligThe Philippine Local Government Code provides the basis for local natural resources management. This Code which was enacted into Law in 1991, however, is not necessarily the driving force for many Local Government Units (LGU’s) who have made breakthroughs in local natural resources management (NRM). The paper provides case studies that reveal the policy and institutional hurdles in implementing local and participatory natural resources management programmes; the lessons and experiences amongst LGU’s in linking good governance with NRM; the research and development activities on local and participatory NRM; and the key institutional and policy issues to be communicated at the national level. Through the development of the Natural Resources Management and Development Plan (NRMDP) employing public-private partnerships and capitalizing the presence of research and non-governmental organizations, agri-business and other community sectors, the Municipality of Lantapan, a local government unit, succeeded in overcoming constraints such as: lack of budget, manpower, technical skills, and poor community involvement. A key feature of the NRMDP is the Landcare Program which centers on formation of community landcare groups that mobilize resources for wider adoption of conservation practices. The Landcare Program is a grassroots approach for rapid and inexpensive dissemination of available, simple, and lower-cost technologies of agroforestry and conservation practices. It was also found out that communities have important roles to play but local government units have greater responsibility to provide the policy and institutional basis for supporting community-based initiatives. Case studies reveal that the responsibility for producing environmental goods goes beyond the normal practices of governance and is entertwined with the need for long-term education and managing the political culture through a pragmatic approach that directly links NRM with good governance.http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/275Public private partnerships; grassroots approach; community-based initiatives; pragmatic approach.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Herminia C. Tanguilig
Valerio C. Tanguilig
spellingShingle Herminia C. Tanguilig
Valerio C. Tanguilig
Institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource management
Field Actions Science Reports
Public private partnerships; grassroots approach; community-based initiatives; pragmatic approach.
author_facet Herminia C. Tanguilig
Valerio C. Tanguilig
author_sort Herminia C. Tanguilig
title Institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource management
title_short Institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource management
title_full Institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource management
title_fullStr Institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource management
title_full_unstemmed Institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource management
title_sort institutional aspects of local participation in natural resource management
publisher Institut Veolia Environnement
series Field Actions Science Reports
issn 1867-139X
1867-8521
publishDate 2010-09-01
description The Philippine Local Government Code provides the basis for local natural resources management. This Code which was enacted into Law in 1991, however, is not necessarily the driving force for many Local Government Units (LGU’s) who have made breakthroughs in local natural resources management (NRM). The paper provides case studies that reveal the policy and institutional hurdles in implementing local and participatory natural resources management programmes; the lessons and experiences amongst LGU’s in linking good governance with NRM; the research and development activities on local and participatory NRM; and the key institutional and policy issues to be communicated at the national level. Through the development of the Natural Resources Management and Development Plan (NRMDP) employing public-private partnerships and capitalizing the presence of research and non-governmental organizations, agri-business and other community sectors, the Municipality of Lantapan, a local government unit, succeeded in overcoming constraints such as: lack of budget, manpower, technical skills, and poor community involvement. A key feature of the NRMDP is the Landcare Program which centers on formation of community landcare groups that mobilize resources for wider adoption of conservation practices. The Landcare Program is a grassroots approach for rapid and inexpensive dissemination of available, simple, and lower-cost technologies of agroforestry and conservation practices. It was also found out that communities have important roles to play but local government units have greater responsibility to provide the policy and institutional basis for supporting community-based initiatives. Case studies reveal that the responsibility for producing environmental goods goes beyond the normal practices of governance and is entertwined with the need for long-term education and managing the political culture through a pragmatic approach that directly links NRM with good governance.
topic Public private partnerships; grassroots approach; community-based initiatives; pragmatic approach.
url http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/275
work_keys_str_mv AT herminiactanguilig institutionalaspectsoflocalparticipationinnaturalresourcemanagement
AT valerioctanguilig institutionalaspectsoflocalparticipationinnaturalresourcemanagement
_version_ 1725443604122435584