Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa

The aim of this paper is to explain and evaluate Rorty’s thesis of the contingency of language, by examining the validity of the Davidsonian proposal of passing theories of meaning, upon which the thesis rests. The impossibility of the existence of different vocabularies irreducible to a single one,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jorge Sierra Merchán
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fundación Universidad Autónoma de Colombia 2013-01-01
Series:Grafía
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.fuac.edu.co/index.php/grafia/article/download/354/337
id doaj-4960afa329c74c73a30d37b43938f740
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4960afa329c74c73a30d37b43938f7402020-11-25T02:39:17ZengFundación Universidad Autónoma de ColombiaGrafía1692-62501692-62502013-01-01101127147http://dx.doi.org/10.26564/16926250.354Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativaJorge Sierra Merchán0Universidad Autónoma de ColombiaThe aim of this paper is to explain and evaluate Rorty’s thesis of the contingency of language, by examining the validity of the Davidsonian proposal of passing theories of meaning, upon which the thesis rests. The impossibility of the existence of different vocabularies irreducible to a single one, or the impossibility of a definitive meta-lexicon (contingency thesis), presupposes the validity of the Davidsonian approach of passing theories, which attempts to dissolve the notion of language as a defined a priori object of study that could stand a theory. Now such Davidsonian approach to language and communication faces a difficulty: the very possibility of understanding the language deviations posed by malapropisms presupposes knowledge of strict semantic rules. Such assumption can be interpreted as the need to recognize that there are transcendental conditions of communication, as Habermas argues, which implies that Rortian contextualism involved in the contingency thesis, and the thesis itself, must be false. I will show that Rorty can counter-attack Habermas’ transcendentalism by a critique of the transcendental model of argumentation, which attempts to show that it is meaningless to speak of transcendental conditions that we can apply and learn, which supposedly constitute the mechanism to overcome the contextualism involved in the thesis of the contingency of language.http://revistas.fuac.edu.co/index.php/grafia/article/download/354/337liberal utopiasolidaritytolerancenarrative turnliterary culturemomentary theories of significationcontingency of languagetranscendental arguments
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jorge Sierra Merchán
spellingShingle Jorge Sierra Merchán
Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa
Grafía
liberal utopia
solidarity
tolerance
narrative turn
literary culture
momentary theories of signification
contingency of language
transcendental arguments
author_facet Jorge Sierra Merchán
author_sort Jorge Sierra Merchán
title Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa
title_short Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa
title_full Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa
title_fullStr Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa
title_full_unstemmed Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa
title_sort del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa
publisher Fundación Universidad Autónoma de Colombia
series Grafía
issn 1692-6250
1692-6250
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The aim of this paper is to explain and evaluate Rorty’s thesis of the contingency of language, by examining the validity of the Davidsonian proposal of passing theories of meaning, upon which the thesis rests. The impossibility of the existence of different vocabularies irreducible to a single one, or the impossibility of a definitive meta-lexicon (contingency thesis), presupposes the validity of the Davidsonian approach of passing theories, which attempts to dissolve the notion of language as a defined a priori object of study that could stand a theory. Now such Davidsonian approach to language and communication faces a difficulty: the very possibility of understanding the language deviations posed by malapropisms presupposes knowledge of strict semantic rules. Such assumption can be interpreted as the need to recognize that there are transcendental conditions of communication, as Habermas argues, which implies that Rortian contextualism involved in the contingency thesis, and the thesis itself, must be false. I will show that Rorty can counter-attack Habermas’ transcendentalism by a critique of the transcendental model of argumentation, which attempts to show that it is meaningless to speak of transcendental conditions that we can apply and learn, which supposedly constitute the mechanism to overcome the contextualism involved in the thesis of the contingency of language.
topic liberal utopia
solidarity
tolerance
narrative turn
literary culture
momentary theories of signification
contingency of language
transcendental arguments
url http://revistas.fuac.edu.co/index.php/grafia/article/download/354/337
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgesierramerchan delgirolinguisticoalgironarrativorortylacontingenciadellenguajeylafilosofiacomonarrativa
_version_ 1724787067563540480