Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa
The aim of this paper is to explain and evaluate Rorty’s thesis of the contingency of language, by examining the validity of the Davidsonian proposal of passing theories of meaning, upon which the thesis rests. The impossibility of the existence of different vocabularies irreducible to a single one,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Fundación Universidad Autónoma de Colombia
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Grafía |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.fuac.edu.co/index.php/grafia/article/download/354/337 |
id |
doaj-4960afa329c74c73a30d37b43938f740 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4960afa329c74c73a30d37b43938f7402020-11-25T02:39:17ZengFundación Universidad Autónoma de ColombiaGrafía1692-62501692-62502013-01-01101127147http://dx.doi.org/10.26564/16926250.354Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativaJorge Sierra Merchán0Universidad Autónoma de ColombiaThe aim of this paper is to explain and evaluate Rorty’s thesis of the contingency of language, by examining the validity of the Davidsonian proposal of passing theories of meaning, upon which the thesis rests. The impossibility of the existence of different vocabularies irreducible to a single one, or the impossibility of a definitive meta-lexicon (contingency thesis), presupposes the validity of the Davidsonian approach of passing theories, which attempts to dissolve the notion of language as a defined a priori object of study that could stand a theory. Now such Davidsonian approach to language and communication faces a difficulty: the very possibility of understanding the language deviations posed by malapropisms presupposes knowledge of strict semantic rules. Such assumption can be interpreted as the need to recognize that there are transcendental conditions of communication, as Habermas argues, which implies that Rortian contextualism involved in the contingency thesis, and the thesis itself, must be false. I will show that Rorty can counter-attack Habermas’ transcendentalism by a critique of the transcendental model of argumentation, which attempts to show that it is meaningless to speak of transcendental conditions that we can apply and learn, which supposedly constitute the mechanism to overcome the contextualism involved in the thesis of the contingency of language.http://revistas.fuac.edu.co/index.php/grafia/article/download/354/337liberal utopiasolidaritytolerancenarrative turnliterary culturemomentary theories of significationcontingency of languagetranscendental arguments |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jorge Sierra Merchán |
spellingShingle |
Jorge Sierra Merchán Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa Grafía liberal utopia solidarity tolerance narrative turn literary culture momentary theories of signification contingency of language transcendental arguments |
author_facet |
Jorge Sierra Merchán |
author_sort |
Jorge Sierra Merchán |
title |
Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa |
title_short |
Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa |
title_full |
Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa |
title_fullStr |
Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: Rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa |
title_sort |
del giro lingüístico al giro narrativo: rorty, la contingencia del lenguaje y la filosofía como narrativa |
publisher |
Fundación Universidad Autónoma de Colombia |
series |
Grafía |
issn |
1692-6250 1692-6250 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
The aim of this paper is to explain and evaluate Rorty’s thesis of the contingency of language, by examining the validity of the Davidsonian proposal of passing theories of meaning, upon which the thesis rests. The impossibility of the existence of different vocabularies irreducible to a single one, or the impossibility of a definitive meta-lexicon (contingency thesis), presupposes the validity of the Davidsonian approach of passing theories, which attempts to dissolve the notion of language as a defined a priori object of study that could stand a theory. Now such Davidsonian approach to language and communication faces a difficulty: the very possibility of understanding the language deviations posed by malapropisms presupposes knowledge of strict semantic rules. Such assumption can be interpreted as the need to recognize that there are transcendental conditions of communication, as Habermas argues, which implies that Rortian contextualism involved in the contingency thesis, and the thesis itself, must be false. I will show that Rorty can counter-attack Habermas’ transcendentalism by a critique of the transcendental model of argumentation, which attempts to show that it is meaningless to speak of transcendental conditions that we can apply and learn, which supposedly constitute the mechanism to overcome the contextualism involved in the thesis of the contingency of language. |
topic |
liberal utopia solidarity tolerance narrative turn literary culture momentary theories of signification contingency of language transcendental arguments |
url |
http://revistas.fuac.edu.co/index.php/grafia/article/download/354/337 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jorgesierramerchan delgirolinguisticoalgironarrativorortylacontingenciadellenguajeylafilosofiacomonarrativa |
_version_ |
1724787067563540480 |