Design of composite measure schemes for comparative severity assessment in animal-based neuroscience research: A case study focussed on rat epilepsy models.
Comparative severity assessment of animal models and experimental interventions is of utmost relevance for harm-benefit analysis during ethical evaluation, an animal welfare-based model prioritization as well as the validation of refinement measures. Unfortunately, there is a lack of evidence-based...
Main Authors: | Roelof Maarten van Dijk, Ines Koska, Andre Bleich, Rene Tolba, Isabel Seiffert, Christina Möller, Valentina Di Liberto, Steven Roger Talbot, Heidrun Potschka |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230141 |
Similar Items
-
Imaging correlates of behavioral impairments: An experimental PET study in the rat pilocarpine epilepsy model
by: Valentina Di Liberto, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Is 21st century neuroscience too focussed on the rat/mouse model of brain function and dysfunction?
by: Paul Manger, et al.
Published: (2008-11-01) -
Proteomic signature of the Dravet syndrome in the genetic Scn1a-A1783V mouse model
by: Nina Miljanovic, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Epilepsy and Neuroscience: Evolution and Interaction
by: Edward Henry Reynolds
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Impact of the PSA-NCAM system on pathophysiology in a chronic rodent model of temporal lobe epilepsy
by: Anton Pekcec, et al.
Published: (2007-07-01)