Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs
Background: Voluntarily opening or closing our eyes results in fundamentally different input patterns and expectancies. Yet it remains unclear how our brains and visual systems adapt to these ocular states.Objective/Hypothesis: We here used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the excita...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Brain Stimulation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X1730788X |
id |
doaj-494ccf0b6aad4a3db3bfb860933d12ba |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-494ccf0b6aad4a3db3bfb860933d12ba2021-03-19T07:10:49ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2017-07-01104828835Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputsT.A. de Graaf0F. Duecker1Y. Stankevich2S. ten Oever3A.T. Sack4Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Corresponding author. Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Maastricht, The NetherlandsBackground: Voluntarily opening or closing our eyes results in fundamentally different input patterns and expectancies. Yet it remains unclear how our brains and visual systems adapt to these ocular states.Objective/Hypothesis: We here used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the excitability of the human visual system with eyes open or closed, in the complete absence of visual inputs. Methods: Combining Bayesian staircase procedures with computer control of TMS pulse intensity allowed interleaved determination of phosphene thresholds (PT) in both conditions. We measured parieto-occipital EEG baseline activity in several stages to track oscillatory power in the alpha (8–12 Hz) frequency-band, which has previously been shown to be inversely related to phosphene perception. Results: Since closing the eyes generally increases alpha power, one might have expected a decrease in excitability (higher PT). While we confirmed a rise in alpha power with eyes closed, visual excitability was actually increased (PT was lower) with eyes closed. Conclusions: This suggests that, aside from oscillatory alpha power, additional neuronal mechanisms influence the excitability of early visual cortex. One of these may involve a more internally oriented mode of brain operation, engaged by closing the eyes. In this state, visual cortex may be more susceptible to top-down inputs, to facilitate for example multisensory integration or imagery/working memory, although alternative explanations remain possible.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X1730788XPhospheneThresholdAlphaOscillationsExcitabilityTranscranial magnetic stimulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
T.A. de Graaf F. Duecker Y. Stankevich S. ten Oever A.T. Sack |
spellingShingle |
T.A. de Graaf F. Duecker Y. Stankevich S. ten Oever A.T. Sack Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs Brain Stimulation Phosphene Threshold Alpha Oscillations Excitability Transcranial magnetic stimulation |
author_facet |
T.A. de Graaf F. Duecker Y. Stankevich S. ten Oever A.T. Sack |
author_sort |
T.A. de Graaf |
title |
Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs |
title_short |
Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs |
title_full |
Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs |
title_fullStr |
Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs |
title_sort |
seeing in the dark: phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Brain Stimulation |
issn |
1935-861X |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
Background: Voluntarily opening or closing our eyes results in fundamentally different input patterns and expectancies. Yet it remains unclear how our brains and visual systems adapt to these ocular states.Objective/Hypothesis: We here used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the excitability of the human visual system with eyes open or closed, in the complete absence of visual inputs. Methods: Combining Bayesian staircase procedures with computer control of TMS pulse intensity allowed interleaved determination of phosphene thresholds (PT) in both conditions. We measured parieto-occipital EEG baseline activity in several stages to track oscillatory power in the alpha (8–12 Hz) frequency-band, which has previously been shown to be inversely related to phosphene perception. Results: Since closing the eyes generally increases alpha power, one might have expected a decrease in excitability (higher PT). While we confirmed a rise in alpha power with eyes closed, visual excitability was actually increased (PT was lower) with eyes closed. Conclusions: This suggests that, aside from oscillatory alpha power, additional neuronal mechanisms influence the excitability of early visual cortex. One of these may involve a more internally oriented mode of brain operation, engaged by closing the eyes. In this state, visual cortex may be more susceptible to top-down inputs, to facilitate for example multisensory integration or imagery/working memory, although alternative explanations remain possible. |
topic |
Phosphene Threshold Alpha Oscillations Excitability Transcranial magnetic stimulation |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X1730788X |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tadegraaf seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs AT fduecker seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs AT ystankevich seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs AT stenoever seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs AT atsack seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs |
_version_ |
1724214170042236928 |