Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs

Background: Voluntarily opening or closing our eyes results in fundamentally different input patterns and expectancies. Yet it remains unclear how our brains and visual systems adapt to these ocular states.Objective/Hypothesis: We here used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the excita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T.A. de Graaf, F. Duecker, Y. Stankevich, S. ten Oever, A.T. Sack
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-07-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X1730788X
id doaj-494ccf0b6aad4a3db3bfb860933d12ba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-494ccf0b6aad4a3db3bfb860933d12ba2021-03-19T07:10:49ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2017-07-01104828835Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputsT.A. de Graaf0F. Duecker1Y. Stankevich2S. ten Oever3A.T. Sack4Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Corresponding author. Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Maastricht, The NetherlandsBackground: Voluntarily opening or closing our eyes results in fundamentally different input patterns and expectancies. Yet it remains unclear how our brains and visual systems adapt to these ocular states.Objective/Hypothesis: We here used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the excitability of the human visual system with eyes open or closed, in the complete absence of visual inputs. Methods: Combining Bayesian staircase procedures with computer control of TMS pulse intensity allowed interleaved determination of phosphene thresholds (PT) in both conditions. We measured parieto-occipital EEG baseline activity in several stages to track oscillatory power in the alpha (8–12 Hz) frequency-band, which has previously been shown to be inversely related to phosphene perception. Results: Since closing the eyes generally increases alpha power, one might have expected a decrease in excitability (higher PT). While we confirmed a rise in alpha power with eyes closed, visual excitability was actually increased (PT was lower) with eyes closed. Conclusions: This suggests that, aside from oscillatory alpha power, additional neuronal mechanisms influence the excitability of early visual cortex. One of these may involve a more internally oriented mode of brain operation, engaged by closing the eyes. In this state, visual cortex may be more susceptible to top-down inputs, to facilitate for example multisensory integration or imagery/working memory, although alternative explanations remain possible.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X1730788XPhospheneThresholdAlphaOscillationsExcitabilityTranscranial magnetic stimulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T.A. de Graaf
F. Duecker
Y. Stankevich
S. ten Oever
A.T. Sack
spellingShingle T.A. de Graaf
F. Duecker
Y. Stankevich
S. ten Oever
A.T. Sack
Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs
Brain Stimulation
Phosphene
Threshold
Alpha
Oscillations
Excitability
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
author_facet T.A. de Graaf
F. Duecker
Y. Stankevich
S. ten Oever
A.T. Sack
author_sort T.A. de Graaf
title Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs
title_short Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs
title_full Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs
title_fullStr Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs
title_full_unstemmed Seeing in the dark: Phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs
title_sort seeing in the dark: phosphene thresholds with eyes open versus closed in the absence of visual inputs
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Background: Voluntarily opening or closing our eyes results in fundamentally different input patterns and expectancies. Yet it remains unclear how our brains and visual systems adapt to these ocular states.Objective/Hypothesis: We here used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the excitability of the human visual system with eyes open or closed, in the complete absence of visual inputs. Methods: Combining Bayesian staircase procedures with computer control of TMS pulse intensity allowed interleaved determination of phosphene thresholds (PT) in both conditions. We measured parieto-occipital EEG baseline activity in several stages to track oscillatory power in the alpha (8–12 Hz) frequency-band, which has previously been shown to be inversely related to phosphene perception. Results: Since closing the eyes generally increases alpha power, one might have expected a decrease in excitability (higher PT). While we confirmed a rise in alpha power with eyes closed, visual excitability was actually increased (PT was lower) with eyes closed. Conclusions: This suggests that, aside from oscillatory alpha power, additional neuronal mechanisms influence the excitability of early visual cortex. One of these may involve a more internally oriented mode of brain operation, engaged by closing the eyes. In this state, visual cortex may be more susceptible to top-down inputs, to facilitate for example multisensory integration or imagery/working memory, although alternative explanations remain possible.
topic Phosphene
Threshold
Alpha
Oscillations
Excitability
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X1730788X
work_keys_str_mv AT tadegraaf seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs
AT fduecker seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs
AT ystankevich seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs
AT stenoever seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs
AT atsack seeinginthedarkphosphenethresholdswitheyesopenversusclosedintheabsenceofvisualinputs
_version_ 1724214170042236928