Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a gastrointestinal procedure that requires a relatively motionless patient during the intervention. Deep sedation by intravenous propofol combined with an opioid has recently become the preferred sedation technique. However...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2197-8 |
id |
doaj-494c63f1b4a744668d66706af3e0712a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-494c63f1b4a744668d66706af3e0712a2020-11-24T22:01:23ZengBMCTrials1745-62152017-10-011811710.1186/s13063-017-2197-8Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trialSusanne Eberl0Lena Koers1Jeanin E. van Hooft2Edwin de Jong3Thomas Schneider4Markus W. Hollmann5Benedikt Preckel6Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tjongerschans ZiekenhuisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tjongerschans ZiekenhuisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamAbstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a gastrointestinal procedure that requires a relatively motionless patient during the intervention. Deep sedation by intravenous propofol combined with an opioid has recently become the preferred sedation technique. However, when high doses of propofol are used, side effects, namely respiratory depression, may occur. Esketamine has hypnotic, analgesic, and sympathomimetic effects. Our assumption is that a combination of propofol with esketamine reduces the dosage of individual drugs, thereby minimizing sedation side effects while keeping the same satisfaction level of patients and endoscopists. Methods/design The study will be performed as a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Patients undergoing ERCP, ≥ 18 years old, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I–III will be randomized after written informed consent to group K (propofol/esketamine) or to group A (propofol/alfentanil). The primary outcome, reflecting effectiveness of sedation, is the total dose of propofol. Secondary outcome parameters are patients’ and endoscopists’ satisfaction with the procedure and the number of sedation-related pulmonary and cardiovascular events. Data on sedation-related events are collected by recording of oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal CO2 (etCO2), heart rate (HR), arrhythmias (electrocardiogram (ECG)), and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements. Satisfaction parameters are collected by means of questionnaires before and after the procedure and on the following day. Discussion Esketamine is known for its effective anesthetic and analgesic effects maintaining spontaneous breathing and airway reflexes. Due to an increase in sympathetic tone, hypotension and cardiac depression is less common. Unfortunately esketamine is also known for its psychotomimetic effects. We aim to demonstrate that the combination of esketamine with propofol for sedation in patients subjected to ERCP interventions is nevertheless superior to a combination of propofol with an opioid. Trial registration Nederland’s Trial Register, NTR5486 . Registered on 17 September 2015.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2197-8Procedural sedationPropofolERCPEsketamine |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Susanne Eberl Lena Koers Jeanin E. van Hooft Edwin de Jong Thomas Schneider Markus W. Hollmann Benedikt Preckel |
spellingShingle |
Susanne Eberl Lena Koers Jeanin E. van Hooft Edwin de Jong Thomas Schneider Markus W. Hollmann Benedikt Preckel Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Trials Procedural sedation Propofol ERCP Esketamine |
author_facet |
Susanne Eberl Lena Koers Jeanin E. van Hooft Edwin de Jong Thomas Schneider Markus W. Hollmann Benedikt Preckel |
author_sort |
Susanne Eberl |
title |
Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
sedation with propofol during ercp: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Trials |
issn |
1745-6215 |
publishDate |
2017-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a gastrointestinal procedure that requires a relatively motionless patient during the intervention. Deep sedation by intravenous propofol combined with an opioid has recently become the preferred sedation technique. However, when high doses of propofol are used, side effects, namely respiratory depression, may occur. Esketamine has hypnotic, analgesic, and sympathomimetic effects. Our assumption is that a combination of propofol with esketamine reduces the dosage of individual drugs, thereby minimizing sedation side effects while keeping the same satisfaction level of patients and endoscopists. Methods/design The study will be performed as a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Patients undergoing ERCP, ≥ 18 years old, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I–III will be randomized after written informed consent to group K (propofol/esketamine) or to group A (propofol/alfentanil). The primary outcome, reflecting effectiveness of sedation, is the total dose of propofol. Secondary outcome parameters are patients’ and endoscopists’ satisfaction with the procedure and the number of sedation-related pulmonary and cardiovascular events. Data on sedation-related events are collected by recording of oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal CO2 (etCO2), heart rate (HR), arrhythmias (electrocardiogram (ECG)), and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements. Satisfaction parameters are collected by means of questionnaires before and after the procedure and on the following day. Discussion Esketamine is known for its effective anesthetic and analgesic effects maintaining spontaneous breathing and airway reflexes. Due to an increase in sympathetic tone, hypotension and cardiac depression is less common. Unfortunately esketamine is also known for its psychotomimetic effects. We aim to demonstrate that the combination of esketamine with propofol for sedation in patients subjected to ERCP interventions is nevertheless superior to a combination of propofol with an opioid. Trial registration Nederland’s Trial Register, NTR5486 . Registered on 17 September 2015. |
topic |
Procedural sedation Propofol ERCP Esketamine |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2197-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT susanneeberl sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lenakoers sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jeaninevanhooft sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT edwindejong sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thomasschneider sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT markuswhollmann sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT benediktpreckel sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1725839898986938368 |