Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a gastrointestinal procedure that requires a relatively motionless patient during the intervention. Deep sedation by intravenous propofol combined with an opioid has recently become the preferred sedation technique. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susanne Eberl, Lena Koers, Jeanin E. van Hooft, Edwin de Jong, Thomas Schneider, Markus W. Hollmann, Benedikt Preckel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2197-8
id doaj-494c63f1b4a744668d66706af3e0712a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-494c63f1b4a744668d66706af3e0712a2020-11-24T22:01:23ZengBMCTrials1745-62152017-10-011811710.1186/s13063-017-2197-8Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trialSusanne Eberl0Lena Koers1Jeanin E. van Hooft2Edwin de Jong3Thomas Schneider4Markus W. Hollmann5Benedikt Preckel6Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tjongerschans ZiekenhuisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tjongerschans ZiekenhuisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamAbstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a gastrointestinal procedure that requires a relatively motionless patient during the intervention. Deep sedation by intravenous propofol combined with an opioid has recently become the preferred sedation technique. However, when high doses of propofol are used, side effects, namely respiratory depression, may occur. Esketamine has hypnotic, analgesic, and sympathomimetic effects. Our assumption is that a combination of propofol with esketamine reduces the dosage of individual drugs, thereby minimizing sedation side effects while keeping the same satisfaction level of patients and endoscopists. Methods/design The study will be performed as a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Patients undergoing ERCP, ≥ 18 years old, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I–III will be randomized after written informed consent to group K (propofol/esketamine) or to group A (propofol/alfentanil). The primary outcome, reflecting effectiveness of sedation, is the total dose of propofol. Secondary outcome parameters are patients’ and endoscopists’ satisfaction with the procedure and the number of sedation-related pulmonary and cardiovascular events. Data on sedation-related events are collected by recording of oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal CO2 (etCO2), heart rate (HR), arrhythmias (electrocardiogram (ECG)), and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements. Satisfaction parameters are collected by means of questionnaires before and after the procedure and on the following day. Discussion Esketamine is known for its effective anesthetic and analgesic effects maintaining spontaneous breathing and airway reflexes. Due to an increase in sympathetic tone, hypotension and cardiac depression is less common. Unfortunately esketamine is also known for its psychotomimetic effects. We aim to demonstrate that the combination of esketamine with propofol for sedation in patients subjected to ERCP interventions is nevertheless superior to a combination of propofol with an opioid. Trial registration Nederland’s Trial Register, NTR5486 . Registered on 17 September 2015.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2197-8Procedural sedationPropofolERCPEsketamine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susanne Eberl
Lena Koers
Jeanin E. van Hooft
Edwin de Jong
Thomas Schneider
Markus W. Hollmann
Benedikt Preckel
spellingShingle Susanne Eberl
Lena Koers
Jeanin E. van Hooft
Edwin de Jong
Thomas Schneider
Markus W. Hollmann
Benedikt Preckel
Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Trials
Procedural sedation
Propofol
ERCP
Esketamine
author_facet Susanne Eberl
Lena Koers
Jeanin E. van Hooft
Edwin de Jong
Thomas Schneider
Markus W. Hollmann
Benedikt Preckel
author_sort Susanne Eberl
title Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort sedation with propofol during ercp: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a gastrointestinal procedure that requires a relatively motionless patient during the intervention. Deep sedation by intravenous propofol combined with an opioid has recently become the preferred sedation technique. However, when high doses of propofol are used, side effects, namely respiratory depression, may occur. Esketamine has hypnotic, analgesic, and sympathomimetic effects. Our assumption is that a combination of propofol with esketamine reduces the dosage of individual drugs, thereby minimizing sedation side effects while keeping the same satisfaction level of patients and endoscopists. Methods/design The study will be performed as a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Patients undergoing ERCP, ≥ 18 years old, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I–III will be randomized after written informed consent to group K (propofol/esketamine) or to group A (propofol/alfentanil). The primary outcome, reflecting effectiveness of sedation, is the total dose of propofol. Secondary outcome parameters are patients’ and endoscopists’ satisfaction with the procedure and the number of sedation-related pulmonary and cardiovascular events. Data on sedation-related events are collected by recording of oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal CO2 (etCO2), heart rate (HR), arrhythmias (electrocardiogram (ECG)), and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements. Satisfaction parameters are collected by means of questionnaires before and after the procedure and on the following day. Discussion Esketamine is known for its effective anesthetic and analgesic effects maintaining spontaneous breathing and airway reflexes. Due to an increase in sympathetic tone, hypotension and cardiac depression is less common. Unfortunately esketamine is also known for its psychotomimetic effects. We aim to demonstrate that the combination of esketamine with propofol for sedation in patients subjected to ERCP interventions is nevertheless superior to a combination of propofol with an opioid. Trial registration Nederland’s Trial Register, NTR5486 . Registered on 17 September 2015.
topic Procedural sedation
Propofol
ERCP
Esketamine
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2197-8
work_keys_str_mv AT susanneeberl sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lenakoers sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jeaninevanhooft sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT edwindejong sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomasschneider sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT markuswhollmann sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT benediktpreckel sedationwithpropofolduringercpisthecombinationwithesketaminemoreeffectiveandsaferthanwithalfentanilstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725839898986938368