Prevalence of cancer and the benign call rate of afirma gene classifier in 18F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography positive cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

Abstract Background 18 F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) positive (PET+) cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) have variable cancer risk in the literature. The benign call rate (BCR) of Afirma Gene Classifier (Gene Expression Classifier...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mayumi Endo, Jennifer A. Sipos, Matthew D. Ringel, Kyle Porter, Haikady N. Nagaraja, John E. Phay, Lawrence A. Shirley, Clarine Long, Chadwick L. Wright, Katie Roll, Fadi A. Nabhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-02-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3704
Description
Summary:Abstract Background 18 F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) positive (PET+) cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) have variable cancer risk in the literature. The benign call rate (BCR) of Afirma Gene Classifier (Gene Expression Classifier, GEC, or Genome Sequence Classifier, GSC) in (PET +) ITNs is unknown. Methods This is a retrospective study at our institution of all patients with (PET+) ITNs (Bethesda III/IV) from 1 January 2010 to 21 May 2019 who underwent Afirma testing and/or surgery or repeat FNA with benign cytology. Results Forty‐five (PET+) ITNs were identified: 31 Afirma‐tested (GEC = 20, GSC = 11) and 14 either underwent surgery (n = 13) or repeat FNA (Benign cytology) (n = 1) without Afirma. The prevalence of cancer and noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary‐like nuclear features (NIFTP) including only resected nodules and ITN with repeat benign FNA (n = 33) was 36.4% (12/33). Excluding all Afirma “suspicious” non‐resected ITNs and assuming all Afirma “benign” ITNs were truly benign, that prevalence was 28.6% (12/42). The BCR with GSC was 64% compared to 25% with GEC (p = 0.056). Combining GSC/GEC‐tested ITNs, the BCR was higher in ITNs demonstrating low/very low‐risk sonographic pattern by the American Thyroid Association (ATA) classification and ITNs scoring <4 by the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (ACR‐TI‐RADS) than ITNs with higher sonographic pattern/score (p = 0.025). Conclusions The prevalence of cancer/NIFTP in (PET+) ITNs was 28.6–36.4% depending on the method of calculation. The BCR of Afirma GSC was 64%. Combining Afirma GEC/GSC‐tested ITNs, BCR was higher in ITNs with a lower risk sonographic pattern.
ISSN:2045-7634