Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.

In biparental systems, members of the same pair can vary substantially in the amount of parental care they provide to offspring. The extent of this asymmetry should depend on the relative costs and benefits of care. Individual variation in personality is likely to influence this trade-off, and hence...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samantha C Patrick, Lucy E Browning
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3197650?pdf=render
id doaj-4917d0bad6404b7eafe31db2d46b17dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4917d0bad6404b7eafe31db2d46b17dc2020-11-24T22:16:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-01610e2638310.1371/journal.pone.0026383Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.Samantha C PatrickLucy E BrowningIn biparental systems, members of the same pair can vary substantially in the amount of parental care they provide to offspring. The extent of this asymmetry should depend on the relative costs and benefits of care. Individual variation in personality is likely to influence this trade-off, and hence is a promising candidate to explain differences in care. In addition, plasticity in parental care may also be associated with personality differences. Using exploration behaviour (EB) as a measure of personality, we investigated these possibilities using both natural and experimental data from a wild population of great tits (Parus major). Contrary to predictions, we found no association between EB and natural variation in provisioning behaviour. Nor was EB linked to responsiveness to experimentally increased brood demand. These results are initially surprising given substantial data from other studies suggesting personality should influence investment in parental care. However, they are consistent with a recent study showing selection on EB is weak and highly context-specific in the focal population. This emphasises the difficulty faced by personality studies attempting to make predictions based on previous work, given that personalities often vary among populations of the same species.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3197650?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samantha C Patrick
Lucy E Browning
spellingShingle Samantha C Patrick
Lucy E Browning
Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Samantha C Patrick
Lucy E Browning
author_sort Samantha C Patrick
title Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.
title_short Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.
title_full Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.
title_fullStr Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.
title_full_unstemmed Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.
title_sort exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description In biparental systems, members of the same pair can vary substantially in the amount of parental care they provide to offspring. The extent of this asymmetry should depend on the relative costs and benefits of care. Individual variation in personality is likely to influence this trade-off, and hence is a promising candidate to explain differences in care. In addition, plasticity in parental care may also be associated with personality differences. Using exploration behaviour (EB) as a measure of personality, we investigated these possibilities using both natural and experimental data from a wild population of great tits (Parus major). Contrary to predictions, we found no association between EB and natural variation in provisioning behaviour. Nor was EB linked to responsiveness to experimentally increased brood demand. These results are initially surprising given substantial data from other studies suggesting personality should influence investment in parental care. However, they are consistent with a recent study showing selection on EB is weak and highly context-specific in the focal population. This emphasises the difficulty faced by personality studies attempting to make predictions based on previous work, given that personalities often vary among populations of the same species.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3197650?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT samanthacpatrick explorationbehaviourisnotassociatedwithchickprovisioningingreattits
AT lucyebrowning explorationbehaviourisnotassociatedwithchickprovisioningingreattits
_version_ 1725787636545617920