A Modified Approach to Conflict Management From the Perspective of Non-Conflicting Element Set

In Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory, how to deal with conflict is an important and open topic. Two key strategies for resolving conflicts of evidence are considered, namely information averaging and information focus. How to balance this relationship is still a question worth considering. Recen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiangjun Mi, Bingyi Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2020-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9068257/
id doaj-4895f705c1234ab58f62386bee95c8e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4895f705c1234ab58f62386bee95c8e22021-03-30T01:40:13ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-018731117312610.1109/ACCESS.2020.29880369068257A Modified Approach to Conflict Management From the Perspective of Non-Conflicting Element SetXiangjun Mi0Bingyi Kang1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2637-4695College of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, ChinaCollege of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, ChinaIn Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory, how to deal with conflict is an important and open topic. Two key strategies for resolving conflicts of evidence are considered, namely information averaging and information focus. How to balance this relationship is still a question worth considering. Recently, Ma et al. studied evidence conflicts from the perspective of complete conflict set and proposed a flexible rule for conflict evidence combination. The proposed combination rule seems to take into account the above two strategies. However, through analysis, we find that Ma et al.'s method tends to use the average method to solve conflicting propositions, while Dempster's combined rule has a weak focusing function. In this paper, based on the concept of non-conflict element set, a new conflict handling method is proposed. First, the similarity between the evidences is characterized by the correlation coefficient; based on this, a new weighting scheme of evidence is developed. In addition, the propositional support is reasonably allocated through discounts.Through numerical examples, the applicability and superiority of the method are compared and analyzed. The results show that the proposed method takes two strategies of averaging and focusing into consideration, and the information variance is small.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9068257/Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theorycorrelation coefficientnon-conflicting element setconflict management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiangjun Mi
Bingyi Kang
spellingShingle Xiangjun Mi
Bingyi Kang
A Modified Approach to Conflict Management From the Perspective of Non-Conflicting Element Set
IEEE Access
Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory
correlation coefficient
non-conflicting element set
conflict management
author_facet Xiangjun Mi
Bingyi Kang
author_sort Xiangjun Mi
title A Modified Approach to Conflict Management From the Perspective of Non-Conflicting Element Set
title_short A Modified Approach to Conflict Management From the Perspective of Non-Conflicting Element Set
title_full A Modified Approach to Conflict Management From the Perspective of Non-Conflicting Element Set
title_fullStr A Modified Approach to Conflict Management From the Perspective of Non-Conflicting Element Set
title_full_unstemmed A Modified Approach to Conflict Management From the Perspective of Non-Conflicting Element Set
title_sort modified approach to conflict management from the perspective of non-conflicting element set
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2020-01-01
description In Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory, how to deal with conflict is an important and open topic. Two key strategies for resolving conflicts of evidence are considered, namely information averaging and information focus. How to balance this relationship is still a question worth considering. Recently, Ma et al. studied evidence conflicts from the perspective of complete conflict set and proposed a flexible rule for conflict evidence combination. The proposed combination rule seems to take into account the above two strategies. However, through analysis, we find that Ma et al.'s method tends to use the average method to solve conflicting propositions, while Dempster's combined rule has a weak focusing function. In this paper, based on the concept of non-conflict element set, a new conflict handling method is proposed. First, the similarity between the evidences is characterized by the correlation coefficient; based on this, a new weighting scheme of evidence is developed. In addition, the propositional support is reasonably allocated through discounts.Through numerical examples, the applicability and superiority of the method are compared and analyzed. The results show that the proposed method takes two strategies of averaging and focusing into consideration, and the information variance is small.
topic Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory
correlation coefficient
non-conflicting element set
conflict management
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9068257/
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangjunmi amodifiedapproachtoconflictmanagementfromtheperspectiveofnonconflictingelementset
AT bingyikang amodifiedapproachtoconflictmanagementfromtheperspectiveofnonconflictingelementset
AT xiangjunmi modifiedapproachtoconflictmanagementfromtheperspectiveofnonconflictingelementset
AT bingyikang modifiedapproachtoconflictmanagementfromtheperspectiveofnonconflictingelementset
_version_ 1724186653436674048