Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology

Purpose. To improve success of in vitro fertilization (IVF), assisted reproductive technology (ART) experts addressed four questions. What is optimum oocytes number leading to highest live birth rate (LBR)? Are cohort size and embryo quality correlated? Does gonadotropin type affect oocyte yield? Sh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baiju Ahemmed, Vani Sundarapandian, Rohit Gutgutia, Sathya Balasubramanyam, Richa Jagtap, Reeta Biliangady, Priti Gupta, Sachin Jadhav, Ruma Satwik, Pavitra Raj Dewda, Priti Thakor, Sandro C. Esteves
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9451235
id doaj-48902677913e44958d896bed9c4a7468
record_format Article
spelling doaj-48902677913e44958d896bed9c4a74682020-11-25T01:22:57ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Reproductive Medicine2356-71042314-57572017-01-01201710.1155/2017/94512359451235Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive TechnologyBaiju Ahemmed0Vani Sundarapandian1Rohit Gutgutia2Sathya Balasubramanyam3Richa Jagtap4Reeta Biliangady5Priti Gupta6Sachin Jadhav7Ruma Satwik8Pavitra Raj Dewda9Priti Thakor10Sandro C. Esteves11NCARE Group of IVF Centres, Kerala, IndiaJananam Fertility Center, Chennai, IndiaNova IVI Fertility, Kolkata, IndiaCloud 9 Hospitals, Chennai, IndiaNova IVI Fertility, Mumbai, IndiaCloud 9 Fertility, Bengaluru, IndiaFertility and IVF-Jaipur Golden Hospital & Gupta Maternity Home, Delhi, IndiaGupte Hospital, Pune, IndiaCentre of IVF and Human Reproduction, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, IndiaMedical Affairs, Merck Biopharma, Mumbai, IndiaMedical Affairs, Merck Biopharma, Mumbai, IndiaANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Referral Center for Male Reproduction, Campinas, SP, BrazilPurpose. To improve success of in vitro fertilization (IVF), assisted reproductive technology (ART) experts addressed four questions. What is optimum oocytes number leading to highest live birth rate (LBR)? Are cohort size and embryo quality correlated? Does gonadotropin type affect oocyte yield? Should “freeze-all” policy be adopted in cycles with progesterone >1.5 ng/mL on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration? Methods. Electronic database search included ten studies on which panel gave opinions for improving current practice in controlled ovarian stimulation for ART. Results. Strong association existed between retrieved oocytes number (RON) and LBRs. RON impacted likelihood of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Embryo euploidy decreased with age, not with cohort size. Progesterone > 1.5 ng/dL did not impair cycle outcomes in patients with high cohorts and showed disparate results on day of hCG administration. Conclusions. Ovarian stimulation should be designed to retrieve 10–15 oocytes/treatment. Accurate dosage, gonadotropin type, should be selected as per prediction markers of ovarian response. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist based protocols are advised to avoid OHSS. Cumulative pregnancy rate was most relevant pregnancy endpoint in ART. Cycles with serum progesterone ≥1.5 ng/dL on day of hCG administration should not adopt “freeze-all” policy. Further research is needed due to lack of data availability on progesterone threshold or index.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9451235
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Baiju Ahemmed
Vani Sundarapandian
Rohit Gutgutia
Sathya Balasubramanyam
Richa Jagtap
Reeta Biliangady
Priti Gupta
Sachin Jadhav
Ruma Satwik
Pavitra Raj Dewda
Priti Thakor
Sandro C. Esteves
spellingShingle Baiju Ahemmed
Vani Sundarapandian
Rohit Gutgutia
Sathya Balasubramanyam
Richa Jagtap
Reeta Biliangady
Priti Gupta
Sachin Jadhav
Ruma Satwik
Pavitra Raj Dewda
Priti Thakor
Sandro C. Esteves
Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
author_facet Baiju Ahemmed
Vani Sundarapandian
Rohit Gutgutia
Sathya Balasubramanyam
Richa Jagtap
Reeta Biliangady
Priti Gupta
Sachin Jadhav
Ruma Satwik
Pavitra Raj Dewda
Priti Thakor
Sandro C. Esteves
author_sort Baiju Ahemmed
title Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_short Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_full Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_fullStr Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_sort outcomes and recommendations of an indian expert panel for improved practice in controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
issn 2356-7104
2314-5757
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Purpose. To improve success of in vitro fertilization (IVF), assisted reproductive technology (ART) experts addressed four questions. What is optimum oocytes number leading to highest live birth rate (LBR)? Are cohort size and embryo quality correlated? Does gonadotropin type affect oocyte yield? Should “freeze-all” policy be adopted in cycles with progesterone >1.5 ng/mL on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration? Methods. Electronic database search included ten studies on which panel gave opinions for improving current practice in controlled ovarian stimulation for ART. Results. Strong association existed between retrieved oocytes number (RON) and LBRs. RON impacted likelihood of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Embryo euploidy decreased with age, not with cohort size. Progesterone > 1.5 ng/dL did not impair cycle outcomes in patients with high cohorts and showed disparate results on day of hCG administration. Conclusions. Ovarian stimulation should be designed to retrieve 10–15 oocytes/treatment. Accurate dosage, gonadotropin type, should be selected as per prediction markers of ovarian response. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist based protocols are advised to avoid OHSS. Cumulative pregnancy rate was most relevant pregnancy endpoint in ART. Cycles with serum progesterone ≥1.5 ng/dL on day of hCG administration should not adopt “freeze-all” policy. Further research is needed due to lack of data availability on progesterone threshold or index.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9451235
work_keys_str_mv AT baijuahemmed outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT vanisundarapandian outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT rohitgutgutia outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT sathyabalasubramanyam outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT richajagtap outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT reetabiliangady outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT pritigupta outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT sachinjadhav outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT rumasatwik outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT pavitrarajdewda outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT pritithakor outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT sandrocesteves outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
_version_ 1725124388584423424