Defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - Halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in Northern Europe

The developers in Northern Europe are increasingly looking into tourism as a potential livelihood and contributor to employment and local economies, especially in rural (and peripheral) areas. One potential form of tourism to be further developed in these areas is wellbeing tourism that has started...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaarina Tervo-Kankare, Anja Tuohino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Geographical Society of Northern Finland 2016-12-01
Series:Nordia Geographical Publications
Online Access:https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/64928
id doaj-488e725ae6714a0f9e2dcf9fc6962bd8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-488e725ae6714a0f9e2dcf9fc6962bd82021-03-29T13:12:23ZengThe Geographical Society of Northern FinlandNordia Geographical Publications1238-20862736-97222016-12-01452Defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - Halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in Northern EuropeKaarina Tervo-Kankare0Anja Tuohino1Geography Research Unit, University of OuluCentre for Tourism Studies, University of Eastern Finland The developers in Northern Europe are increasingly looking into tourism as a potential livelihood and contributor to employment and local economies, especially in rural (and peripheral) areas. One potential form of tourism to be further developed in these areas is wellbeing tourism that has started to gain increasing attention in rural areas. In addition, the development of the common rural wellbeing tourism market has started to increase in Northern Europe, and especially around the Baltic Sea. However, the nonexistence of shared understanding of the central concepts, ‘rural’ and ‘wellbeing tourism’ hinders international, collaborative development activities among the various tourism stakeholders operating in the area. Therefore, it is essential to construct a common conception in order to progress in the development of the common rural wellbeing tourism market. In this article we describe one construction process of a commonly accepted, over-arching definition for ‘rural tourism’ or ‘rurality’ in a transnational and multi-stakeholder development project. Our aim is to examine the applicability of the well-known triad understanding of the ‘rural’, originally introduced by Halfacree, in this context. The triad has been utilised in different tourism-related contexts, but its practicality and potential for use in tourism development has been studied less. The definition process we describe in this article shows that the triad cannot be directly utilised for practical-level tourism development purposes. The results indicate that a more critical approach or even deconstruction of Halfacree’s triad could give more fresh and new angles to the development of rural tourism products. https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/64928
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaarina Tervo-Kankare
Anja Tuohino
spellingShingle Kaarina Tervo-Kankare
Anja Tuohino
Defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - Halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in Northern Europe
Nordia Geographical Publications
author_facet Kaarina Tervo-Kankare
Anja Tuohino
author_sort Kaarina Tervo-Kankare
title Defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - Halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in Northern Europe
title_short Defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - Halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in Northern Europe
title_full Defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - Halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in Northern Europe
title_fullStr Defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - Halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in Northern Europe
title_full_unstemmed Defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - Halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in Northern Europe
title_sort defining ‘rurality’ for rural wellbeing tourism - halfacree’s conceptual triad of the production of rural space in practical-level tourism development in northern europe
publisher The Geographical Society of Northern Finland
series Nordia Geographical Publications
issn 1238-2086
2736-9722
publishDate 2016-12-01
description The developers in Northern Europe are increasingly looking into tourism as a potential livelihood and contributor to employment and local economies, especially in rural (and peripheral) areas. One potential form of tourism to be further developed in these areas is wellbeing tourism that has started to gain increasing attention in rural areas. In addition, the development of the common rural wellbeing tourism market has started to increase in Northern Europe, and especially around the Baltic Sea. However, the nonexistence of shared understanding of the central concepts, ‘rural’ and ‘wellbeing tourism’ hinders international, collaborative development activities among the various tourism stakeholders operating in the area. Therefore, it is essential to construct a common conception in order to progress in the development of the common rural wellbeing tourism market. In this article we describe one construction process of a commonly accepted, over-arching definition for ‘rural tourism’ or ‘rurality’ in a transnational and multi-stakeholder development project. Our aim is to examine the applicability of the well-known triad understanding of the ‘rural’, originally introduced by Halfacree, in this context. The triad has been utilised in different tourism-related contexts, but its practicality and potential for use in tourism development has been studied less. The definition process we describe in this article shows that the triad cannot be directly utilised for practical-level tourism development purposes. The results indicate that a more critical approach or even deconstruction of Halfacree’s triad could give more fresh and new angles to the development of rural tourism products.
url https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/64928
work_keys_str_mv AT kaarinatervokankare definingruralityforruralwellbeingtourismhalfacreesconceptualtriadoftheproductionofruralspaceinpracticalleveltourismdevelopmentinnortherneurope
AT anjatuohino definingruralityforruralwellbeingtourismhalfacreesconceptualtriadoftheproductionofruralspaceinpracticalleveltourismdevelopmentinnortherneurope
_version_ 1724198620633235456