Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins

Water-resource managers are challenged to balance growing water demand with protecting aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity. Management decisions can benefit from improved understanding of water-withdrawal impacts on hydrologic regimes and ecological assemblages. This study used ecological limit func...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas J. Driver, Jennifer M. Cartwright, Rodney R. Knight, William J. Wolfe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1334
id doaj-488e1008c43949d0a8633fa84d175325
record_format Article
spelling doaj-488e1008c43949d0a8633fa84d1753252020-11-25T02:00:30ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-05-01121334133410.3390/w12051334Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River BasinsLucas J. Driver0Jennifer M. Cartwright1Rodney R. Knight2William J. Wolfe3U.S. Geological Survey, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center, Little Rock, AR 72211, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USAWater-resource managers are challenged to balance growing water demand with protecting aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity. Management decisions can benefit from improved understanding of water-withdrawal impacts on hydrologic regimes and ecological assemblages. This study used ecological limit functions for fish groups within the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins to predict species richness responses under simulated constant-rate (CR) and percent-of-flow (POF) withdrawals and for different minimum flow level protections. Streamflow characteristics (SFC) and richness were generally less sensitive to POF withdrawals than CR withdrawals among sites, fish groups, and ecoregions. Species richness generally declined with increasing withdrawals, but responses were variable depending on site-specific departures of SFCs from reference conditions, drainage area, fish group, ecoregion, and minimum flow level. Under POF withdrawals, 10% and 20% daily flow reductions often resulted in loss of <1 species and/or ≤5% richness among fish groups. Median ecological withdrawal thresholds ranged from 3.5–31% for POF withdrawals and from 0.01–0.92 m<sup>3</sup>/s for CR withdrawals across fish groups and ecoregions. Application of minimum flow level cutoffs often resulted in damping effects on SFC and richness responses, indicating that protection of low streamflows may mitigate hydrologic alteration and fish species richness loss related to water withdrawals. Site-specific and regionally summarized responses of flow regimes and fish assemblages under alternative withdrawal strategies in this study may be useful in informing water-management decisions regarding streamflow allocation and maintaining ecological flows.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1334environmental flowswater managementwater withdrawalfish species richnessstreamflow alterationwithdrawal threshold
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucas J. Driver
Jennifer M. Cartwright
Rodney R. Knight
William J. Wolfe
spellingShingle Lucas J. Driver
Jennifer M. Cartwright
Rodney R. Knight
William J. Wolfe
Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins
Water
environmental flows
water management
water withdrawal
fish species richness
streamflow alteration
withdrawal threshold
author_facet Lucas J. Driver
Jennifer M. Cartwright
Rodney R. Knight
William J. Wolfe
author_sort Lucas J. Driver
title Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins
title_short Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins
title_full Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins
title_fullStr Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins
title_full_unstemmed Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins
title_sort species-richness responses to water-withdrawal scenarios and minimum flow levels: evaluating presumptive standards in the tennessee and cumberland river basins
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Water-resource managers are challenged to balance growing water demand with protecting aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity. Management decisions can benefit from improved understanding of water-withdrawal impacts on hydrologic regimes and ecological assemblages. This study used ecological limit functions for fish groups within the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins to predict species richness responses under simulated constant-rate (CR) and percent-of-flow (POF) withdrawals and for different minimum flow level protections. Streamflow characteristics (SFC) and richness were generally less sensitive to POF withdrawals than CR withdrawals among sites, fish groups, and ecoregions. Species richness generally declined with increasing withdrawals, but responses were variable depending on site-specific departures of SFCs from reference conditions, drainage area, fish group, ecoregion, and minimum flow level. Under POF withdrawals, 10% and 20% daily flow reductions often resulted in loss of <1 species and/or ≤5% richness among fish groups. Median ecological withdrawal thresholds ranged from 3.5–31% for POF withdrawals and from 0.01–0.92 m<sup>3</sup>/s for CR withdrawals across fish groups and ecoregions. Application of minimum flow level cutoffs often resulted in damping effects on SFC and richness responses, indicating that protection of low streamflows may mitigate hydrologic alteration and fish species richness loss related to water withdrawals. Site-specific and regionally summarized responses of flow regimes and fish assemblages under alternative withdrawal strategies in this study may be useful in informing water-management decisions regarding streamflow allocation and maintaining ecological flows.
topic environmental flows
water management
water withdrawal
fish species richness
streamflow alteration
withdrawal threshold
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1334
work_keys_str_mv AT lucasjdriver speciesrichnessresponsestowaterwithdrawalscenariosandminimumflowlevelsevaluatingpresumptivestandardsinthetennesseeandcumberlandriverbasins
AT jennifermcartwright speciesrichnessresponsestowaterwithdrawalscenariosandminimumflowlevelsevaluatingpresumptivestandardsinthetennesseeandcumberlandriverbasins
AT rodneyrknight speciesrichnessresponsestowaterwithdrawalscenariosandminimumflowlevelsevaluatingpresumptivestandardsinthetennesseeandcumberlandriverbasins
AT williamjwolfe speciesrichnessresponsestowaterwithdrawalscenariosandminimumflowlevelsevaluatingpresumptivestandardsinthetennesseeandcumberlandriverbasins
_version_ 1724960108215009280