Preparation of P3HB4HB/(Gelatin + PVA) Composite Scaffolds by Coaxial Electrospinning and Its Biocompatibility Evaluation

This study was conducted to prepare coaxial electrospun scaffolds of P3HB4HB/(gelatin + PVA) with various concentration ratios with P3HB4HB as the core solution and gelatin + PVA mixture as the shell solution; the mass ratios of gelatin and PVA in each 10 mL shell mixture were 0.6 g : 0.2 g (Group A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min-Xian Ma, Qin Liu, Chuan Ye, Brian Grottkau, Bing Guo, Yu-Feng Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9251806
id doaj-4871795d792b4b2198821a963c686603
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4871795d792b4b2198821a963c6866032020-11-24T23:15:27ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412017-01-01201710.1155/2017/92518069251806Preparation of P3HB4HB/(Gelatin + PVA) Composite Scaffolds by Coaxial Electrospinning and Its Biocompatibility EvaluationMin-Xian Ma0Qin Liu1Chuan Ye2Brian Grottkau3Bing Guo4Yu-Feng Song5Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, ChinaGuizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USAGuizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, ChinaGuizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, ChinaThis study was conducted to prepare coaxial electrospun scaffolds of P3HB4HB/(gelatin + PVA) with various concentration ratios with P3HB4HB as the core solution and gelatin + PVA mixture as the shell solution; the mass ratios of gelatin and PVA in each 10 mL shell mixture were 0.6 g : 0.2 g (Group A), 0.4 g : 0.4 g (Group B), and 0.2 g : 0.6 g (Group C). The results showed that the pore size, porosity, and cell proliferation rate of Group C were better than those of Groups A and B. The ascending order of the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity was Group A < Group B < Group C. The surface roughness was Group C > Group B > Group A. The osteogenic and chondrogenic-specific staining showed that Group C was stronger than Groups A and B. This study demonstrates that when the mass ratio of gelatin : PVA was 0.2 g : 0.6 g, a P3HB4HB/(gelatin + PVA) composite scaffold with a core-shell structure can be prepared, and the scaffold has good biocompatibility that it may be an ideal scaffold for tissue engineering.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9251806
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Min-Xian Ma
Qin Liu
Chuan Ye
Brian Grottkau
Bing Guo
Yu-Feng Song
spellingShingle Min-Xian Ma
Qin Liu
Chuan Ye
Brian Grottkau
Bing Guo
Yu-Feng Song
Preparation of P3HB4HB/(Gelatin + PVA) Composite Scaffolds by Coaxial Electrospinning and Its Biocompatibility Evaluation
BioMed Research International
author_facet Min-Xian Ma
Qin Liu
Chuan Ye
Brian Grottkau
Bing Guo
Yu-Feng Song
author_sort Min-Xian Ma
title Preparation of P3HB4HB/(Gelatin + PVA) Composite Scaffolds by Coaxial Electrospinning and Its Biocompatibility Evaluation
title_short Preparation of P3HB4HB/(Gelatin + PVA) Composite Scaffolds by Coaxial Electrospinning and Its Biocompatibility Evaluation
title_full Preparation of P3HB4HB/(Gelatin + PVA) Composite Scaffolds by Coaxial Electrospinning and Its Biocompatibility Evaluation
title_fullStr Preparation of P3HB4HB/(Gelatin + PVA) Composite Scaffolds by Coaxial Electrospinning and Its Biocompatibility Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Preparation of P3HB4HB/(Gelatin + PVA) Composite Scaffolds by Coaxial Electrospinning and Its Biocompatibility Evaluation
title_sort preparation of p3hb4hb/(gelatin + pva) composite scaffolds by coaxial electrospinning and its biocompatibility evaluation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This study was conducted to prepare coaxial electrospun scaffolds of P3HB4HB/(gelatin + PVA) with various concentration ratios with P3HB4HB as the core solution and gelatin + PVA mixture as the shell solution; the mass ratios of gelatin and PVA in each 10 mL shell mixture were 0.6 g : 0.2 g (Group A), 0.4 g : 0.4 g (Group B), and 0.2 g : 0.6 g (Group C). The results showed that the pore size, porosity, and cell proliferation rate of Group C were better than those of Groups A and B. The ascending order of the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity was Group A < Group B < Group C. The surface roughness was Group C > Group B > Group A. The osteogenic and chondrogenic-specific staining showed that Group C was stronger than Groups A and B. This study demonstrates that when the mass ratio of gelatin : PVA was 0.2 g : 0.6 g, a P3HB4HB/(gelatin + PVA) composite scaffold with a core-shell structure can be prepared, and the scaffold has good biocompatibility that it may be an ideal scaffold for tissue engineering.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9251806
work_keys_str_mv AT minxianma preparationofp3hb4hbgelatinpvacompositescaffoldsbycoaxialelectrospinninganditsbiocompatibilityevaluation
AT qinliu preparationofp3hb4hbgelatinpvacompositescaffoldsbycoaxialelectrospinninganditsbiocompatibilityevaluation
AT chuanye preparationofp3hb4hbgelatinpvacompositescaffoldsbycoaxialelectrospinninganditsbiocompatibilityevaluation
AT briangrottkau preparationofp3hb4hbgelatinpvacompositescaffoldsbycoaxialelectrospinninganditsbiocompatibilityevaluation
AT bingguo preparationofp3hb4hbgelatinpvacompositescaffoldsbycoaxialelectrospinninganditsbiocompatibilityevaluation
AT yufengsong preparationofp3hb4hbgelatinpvacompositescaffoldsbycoaxialelectrospinninganditsbiocompatibilityevaluation
_version_ 1725591072274382848