Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial
Background and aims : The fast development of e-learning and social forums demands us to update our understanding of e-learning and peer learning. We aimed to investigate if higher, pre-defined levels of e-learning or social interaction in web forums improved students’ learning ability. M...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2013-11-01
|
Series: | Medical Education Online |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/download/21877/pdf_1 |
id |
doaj-48329e3e4e6b4401994e24db8b39c8a6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-48329e3e4e6b4401994e24db8b39c8a62020-11-25T02:45:11ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812013-11-011801610.3402/meo.v18i0.21877Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trialBjarne Skjødt WormKenneth JensenBackground and aims : The fast development of e-learning and social forums demands us to update our understanding of e-learning and peer learning. We aimed to investigate if higher, pre-defined levels of e-learning or social interaction in web forums improved students’ learning ability. Methods : One hundred and twenty Danish medical students were randomized to six groups all with 20 students (eCases level 1, eCases level 2, eCases level 2+, eTextbook level 1, eTextbook level 2, and eTextbook level 2+). All students participated in a pre-test, Group 1 participated in an interactive case-based e-learning program, while Group 2 was presented with textbook material electronically. The 2+ groups were able to discuss the material between themselves in a web forum. The subject was head injury and associated treatment and observation guidelines in the emergency room. Following the e-learning, all students completed a post-test. Pre- and post-tests both consisted of 25 questions randomly chosen from a pool of 50 different questions. Results : All students concluded the study with comparable pre-test results. Students at Level 2 (in both groups) improved statistically significant compared to students at level 1 (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between level 2 and level 2+. However, level 2+ was associated with statistically significant greater student's satisfaction than the rest of the students (p>0.05). Conclusions : This study applies a new way of comparing different types of e-learning using a pre-defined level division and the possibility of peer learning. Our findings show that higher levels of e-learning does in fact provide better results when compared with the same type of e-learning at lower levels. While social interaction in web forums increase student satisfaction, learning ability does not seem to change. Both findings are relevant when designing new e-learning materials.http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/download/21877/pdf_1levele-learningLearningTeaching |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bjarne Skjødt Worm Kenneth Jensen |
spellingShingle |
Bjarne Skjødt Worm Kenneth Jensen Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial Medical Education Online level e-learning Learning Teaching |
author_facet |
Bjarne Skjødt Worm Kenneth Jensen |
author_sort |
Bjarne Skjødt Worm |
title |
Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? a randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Medical Education Online |
issn |
1087-2981 |
publishDate |
2013-11-01 |
description |
Background and aims : The fast development of e-learning and social forums demands us to update our understanding of e-learning and peer learning. We aimed to investigate if higher, pre-defined levels of e-learning or social interaction in web forums improved students’ learning ability. Methods : One hundred and twenty Danish medical students were randomized to six groups all with 20 students (eCases level 1, eCases level 2, eCases level 2+, eTextbook level 1, eTextbook level 2, and eTextbook level 2+). All students participated in a pre-test, Group 1 participated in an interactive case-based e-learning program, while Group 2 was presented with textbook material electronically. The 2+ groups were able to discuss the material between themselves in a web forum. The subject was head injury and associated treatment and observation guidelines in the emergency room. Following the e-learning, all students completed a post-test. Pre- and post-tests both consisted of 25 questions randomly chosen from a pool of 50 different questions. Results : All students concluded the study with comparable pre-test results. Students at Level 2 (in both groups) improved statistically significant compared to students at level 1 (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between level 2 and level 2+. However, level 2+ was associated with statistically significant greater student's satisfaction than the rest of the students (p>0.05). Conclusions : This study applies a new way of comparing different types of e-learning using a pre-defined level division and the possibility of peer learning. Our findings show that higher levels of e-learning does in fact provide better results when compared with the same type of e-learning at lower levels. While social interaction in web forums increase student satisfaction, learning ability does not seem to change. Both findings are relevant when designing new e-learning materials. |
topic |
level e-learning Learning Teaching |
url |
http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/download/21877/pdf_1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bjarneskjx00f8dtworm doespeerlearningorhigherlevelsofelearningimprovelearningabilitiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kennethjensen doespeerlearningorhigherlevelsofelearningimprovelearningabilitiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1724763655157841920 |