Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty

Over the last 5 decades monitoring systems have been developed to detect changes in the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere and ocean; however, our ability to detect changes in the behavior of the global C cycle is still hindered by measurement and estimate errors. Here we present a rigorou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. P. Ballantyne, R. Andres, R. Houghton, B. D. Stocker, R. Wanninkhof, W. Anderegg, L. A. Cooper, M. DeGrandpre, P. P. Tans, J. B. Miller, C. Alden, J. W. C. White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-04-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/2565/2015/bg-12-2565-2015.pdf
id doaj-482e6e6ed09b41c4a79d83d7be5b1a33
record_format Article
spelling doaj-482e6e6ed09b41c4a79d83d7be5b1a332020-11-24T22:21:38ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892015-04-011282565258410.5194/bg-12-2565-2015Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertaintyA. P. Ballantyne0R. Andres1R. Houghton2B. D. Stocker3R. Wanninkhof4W. Anderegg5L. A. Cooper6M. DeGrandpre7P. P. Tans8J. B. Miller9C. Alden10J. W. C. White11University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USACarbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USAWoods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA, USAImperial College, London, UKAtlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory of NOAA, Miami, FL, USAPrinceton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USAUniversity of Montana, Missoula, MT, USAUniversity of Montana, Missoula, MT, USAEarth System Research Laboratory of NOAA, Boulder, CO, USAEarth System Research Laboratory of NOAA, Boulder, CO, USAStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USAUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USAOver the last 5 decades monitoring systems have been developed to detect changes in the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere and ocean; however, our ability to detect changes in the behavior of the global C cycle is still hindered by measurement and estimate errors. Here we present a rigorous and flexible framework for assessing the temporal and spatial components of estimate errors and their impact on uncertainty in net C uptake by the biosphere. We present a novel approach for incorporating temporally correlated random error into the error structure of emission estimates. Based on this approach, we conclude that the 2&sigma; uncertainties of the atmospheric growth rate have decreased from 1.2 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> in the 1960s to 0.3 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> in the 2000s due to an expansion of the atmospheric observation network. The 2&sigma; uncertainties in fossil fuel emissions have increased from 0.3 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> in the 1960s to almost 1.0 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> during the 2000s due to differences in national reporting errors and differences in energy inventories. Lastly, while land use emissions have remained fairly constant, their errors still remain high and thus their global C uptake uncertainty is not trivial. Currently, the absolute errors in fossil fuel emissions rival the total emissions from land use, highlighting the extent to which fossil fuels dominate the global C budget. Because errors in the atmospheric growth rate have decreased faster than errors in total emissions have increased, a ~20% reduction in the overall uncertainty of net C global uptake has occurred. Given all the major sources of error in the global C budget that we could identify, we are 93% confident that terrestrial C uptake has increased and 97% confident that ocean C uptake has increased over the last 5 decades. Thus, it is clear that arguably one of the most vital ecosystem services currently provided by the biosphere is the continued removal of approximately half of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the atmosphere, although there are certain environmental costs associated with this service, such as the acidification of ocean waters.http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/2565/2015/bg-12-2565-2015.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. P. Ballantyne
R. Andres
R. Houghton
B. D. Stocker
R. Wanninkhof
W. Anderegg
L. A. Cooper
M. DeGrandpre
P. P. Tans
J. B. Miller
C. Alden
J. W. C. White
spellingShingle A. P. Ballantyne
R. Andres
R. Houghton
B. D. Stocker
R. Wanninkhof
W. Anderegg
L. A. Cooper
M. DeGrandpre
P. P. Tans
J. B. Miller
C. Alden
J. W. C. White
Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty
Biogeosciences
author_facet A. P. Ballantyne
R. Andres
R. Houghton
B. D. Stocker
R. Wanninkhof
W. Anderegg
L. A. Cooper
M. DeGrandpre
P. P. Tans
J. B. Miller
C. Alden
J. W. C. White
author_sort A. P. Ballantyne
title Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty
title_short Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty
title_full Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty
title_fullStr Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty
title_sort audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Biogeosciences
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Over the last 5 decades monitoring systems have been developed to detect changes in the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere and ocean; however, our ability to detect changes in the behavior of the global C cycle is still hindered by measurement and estimate errors. Here we present a rigorous and flexible framework for assessing the temporal and spatial components of estimate errors and their impact on uncertainty in net C uptake by the biosphere. We present a novel approach for incorporating temporally correlated random error into the error structure of emission estimates. Based on this approach, we conclude that the 2&sigma; uncertainties of the atmospheric growth rate have decreased from 1.2 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> in the 1960s to 0.3 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> in the 2000s due to an expansion of the atmospheric observation network. The 2&sigma; uncertainties in fossil fuel emissions have increased from 0.3 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> in the 1960s to almost 1.0 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> during the 2000s due to differences in national reporting errors and differences in energy inventories. Lastly, while land use emissions have remained fairly constant, their errors still remain high and thus their global C uptake uncertainty is not trivial. Currently, the absolute errors in fossil fuel emissions rival the total emissions from land use, highlighting the extent to which fossil fuels dominate the global C budget. Because errors in the atmospheric growth rate have decreased faster than errors in total emissions have increased, a ~20% reduction in the overall uncertainty of net C global uptake has occurred. Given all the major sources of error in the global C budget that we could identify, we are 93% confident that terrestrial C uptake has increased and 97% confident that ocean C uptake has increased over the last 5 decades. Thus, it is clear that arguably one of the most vital ecosystem services currently provided by the biosphere is the continued removal of approximately half of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the atmosphere, although there are certain environmental costs associated with this service, such as the acidification of ocean waters.
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/2565/2015/bg-12-2565-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT apballantyne auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT randres auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT rhoughton auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT bdstocker auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT rwanninkhof auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT wanderegg auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT lacooper auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT mdegrandpre auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT pptans auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT jbmiller auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT calden auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
AT jwcwhite auditoftheglobalcarbonbudgetestimateerrorsandtheirimpactonuptakeuncertainty
_version_ 1725770248849719296