Conflict and concord on the Internet: selvet.dk

The Internet epitomizes globalization. Spanning most of the globe, yet leaving out the most marginalized populations, it reproduces the power structures and inequalities of the world at large. Nevertheless, as technologies become more widely available and more user-friendly, there is the potential t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olav Hammer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Donner Institute 2006-01-01
Series:Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67303
id doaj-482c7b9cfa6b4ea2937fa95fbb24d675
record_format Article
spelling doaj-482c7b9cfa6b4ea2937fa95fbb24d6752020-11-24T22:02:35ZengDonner InstituteScripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis0582-32262343-49372006-01-011910.30674/scripta.67303Conflict and concord on the Internet: selvet.dkOlav Hammer0University of Southern Denmark, OdenseThe Internet epitomizes globalization. Spanning most of the globe, yet leaving out the most marginalized populations, it reproduces the power structures and inequalities of the world at large. Nevertheless, as technologies become more widely available and more user-friendly, there is the potential to interact on an unprecedented scale with people of other nationalities, backgrounds and religious affiliations. Interaction may, of course, foster dialogue, but can also lead to polemics and aggressive behaviour. In discussion groups, Internet forums where opinions are exchanged, the potential for disagreement is evident. In a sensitive area such as religion, the risk of conflict is obviously present. People in different localities, who may well never meet face-to-face, and who do not even need to present themselves on-line under their real names, might in fact find it particularly tempting to handle conflict situations by using verbal invective. This risk is recognized by Internet users, who have adopted the militant metaphor ‘flame war’ to denote such excessive verbal aggression. Most research on religion on the Internet has focused on the use of this medium within one particular religious tradition, usually Christian or Muslim. Considerably less attention has been devoted to the question of what happens when members of different traditions interact and confront the opinions of others. The present article looks at some of the ways in which potential conflicts in this confrontation between various traditions are managed. The empirical material analysed has been chosen with one main objective in mind: the need to find a discussion group where people of sufficiently divergent opinions meet. The Danish site selvet.dk is a forum where people of quite different persuasions meet, and thus need to work out a modus vivendi when sharp divergences become manifest.https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67303Information technologyMedia and religionElectronic discussion groupsSocial mediaInternetGlobalization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olav Hammer
spellingShingle Olav Hammer
Conflict and concord on the Internet: selvet.dk
Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis
Information technology
Media and religion
Electronic discussion groups
Social media
Internet
Globalization
author_facet Olav Hammer
author_sort Olav Hammer
title Conflict and concord on the Internet: selvet.dk
title_short Conflict and concord on the Internet: selvet.dk
title_full Conflict and concord on the Internet: selvet.dk
title_fullStr Conflict and concord on the Internet: selvet.dk
title_full_unstemmed Conflict and concord on the Internet: selvet.dk
title_sort conflict and concord on the internet: selvet.dk
publisher Donner Institute
series Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis
issn 0582-3226
2343-4937
publishDate 2006-01-01
description The Internet epitomizes globalization. Spanning most of the globe, yet leaving out the most marginalized populations, it reproduces the power structures and inequalities of the world at large. Nevertheless, as technologies become more widely available and more user-friendly, there is the potential to interact on an unprecedented scale with people of other nationalities, backgrounds and religious affiliations. Interaction may, of course, foster dialogue, but can also lead to polemics and aggressive behaviour. In discussion groups, Internet forums where opinions are exchanged, the potential for disagreement is evident. In a sensitive area such as religion, the risk of conflict is obviously present. People in different localities, who may well never meet face-to-face, and who do not even need to present themselves on-line under their real names, might in fact find it particularly tempting to handle conflict situations by using verbal invective. This risk is recognized by Internet users, who have adopted the militant metaphor ‘flame war’ to denote such excessive verbal aggression. Most research on religion on the Internet has focused on the use of this medium within one particular religious tradition, usually Christian or Muslim. Considerably less attention has been devoted to the question of what happens when members of different traditions interact and confront the opinions of others. The present article looks at some of the ways in which potential conflicts in this confrontation between various traditions are managed. The empirical material analysed has been chosen with one main objective in mind: the need to find a discussion group where people of sufficiently divergent opinions meet. The Danish site selvet.dk is a forum where people of quite different persuasions meet, and thus need to work out a modus vivendi when sharp divergences become manifest.
topic Information technology
Media and religion
Electronic discussion groups
Social media
Internet
Globalization
url https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67303
work_keys_str_mv AT olavhammer conflictandconcordontheinternetselvetdk
_version_ 1725835011056205824