Adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedings

The article examines the essence and content of the powers of the court of first instance to make a judgement and control its implementation in order to improve the effectiveness of judicial protection of violated rights of citizens and organisations against illegal acts of public law bodies, the co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kuliushin Evgenii Nikolaevich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/29/shsconf_rudnltmrp2021_03029.pdf
id doaj-482637a48d104ae1a4c3bf6f6a5bd800
record_format Article
spelling doaj-482637a48d104ae1a4c3bf6f6a5bd8002021-08-26T09:28:14ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242021-01-011180302910.1051/shsconf/202111803029shsconf_rudnltmrp2021_03029Adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedingsKuliushin Evgenii NikolaevichThe article examines the essence and content of the powers of the court of first instance to make a judgement and control its implementation in order to improve the effectiveness of judicial protection of violated rights of citizens and organisations against illegal acts of public law bodies, the correctness and timeliness of consideration and resolution of cases in public law disputes, prevention of violations in the area of public law relations, the possibility of reducing the burden on courts of first instance in various categories of public law disputes. The key focus is on the peculiarities of exercising by a court of powers to make court judgements and exercising control of their execution in public law disputes on the basis of historical-legal, comparative-legal and formal-legal methods of researching similar powers of courts in countries of the civil law system (France, Germany) and countries representing the common law system (England, USA), comparing the contents of the powers of the court in administrative proceedings in accordance with the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and the powers of the court in civil and arbitration proceedings. The use of historical-legal, comparative-legal and formal-legal methods for researching the content of powers to adopt a court judgement and exercise control over its execution made it possible to formulate conclusions regarding the scope of procedural actions of the court of first instance in administrative proceedings, the possibilities of improving the model for exercising judicial control over acts in public-legal authorities, correctness and timeliness of execution of court judgements taken against public law authorities in order to ensure that the weak side in administrative proceedings can be protected. The novelty of the work lies in the proof that in order to increase the effectiveness of the protection of the violated rights of individuals against unlawful acts of public authorities, it is necessary to improve the mechanism for the exercise by the court of powers to make a judgement and exercise control over implementing it.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/29/shsconf_rudnltmrp2021_03029.pdfadministrative proceedingscourt of first instanceastreintecourt decisionscontrol over the execution of court decisions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kuliushin Evgenii Nikolaevich
spellingShingle Kuliushin Evgenii Nikolaevich
Adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedings
SHS Web of Conferences
administrative proceedings
court of first instance
astreinte
court decisions
control over the execution of court decisions
author_facet Kuliushin Evgenii Nikolaevich
author_sort Kuliushin Evgenii Nikolaevich
title Adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedings
title_short Adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedings
title_full Adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedings
title_fullStr Adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedings
title_full_unstemmed Adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedings
title_sort adoption of a judgement and exercising control of its performance by a court in administrative proceedings
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The article examines the essence and content of the powers of the court of first instance to make a judgement and control its implementation in order to improve the effectiveness of judicial protection of violated rights of citizens and organisations against illegal acts of public law bodies, the correctness and timeliness of consideration and resolution of cases in public law disputes, prevention of violations in the area of public law relations, the possibility of reducing the burden on courts of first instance in various categories of public law disputes. The key focus is on the peculiarities of exercising by a court of powers to make court judgements and exercising control of their execution in public law disputes on the basis of historical-legal, comparative-legal and formal-legal methods of researching similar powers of courts in countries of the civil law system (France, Germany) and countries representing the common law system (England, USA), comparing the contents of the powers of the court in administrative proceedings in accordance with the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and the powers of the court in civil and arbitration proceedings. The use of historical-legal, comparative-legal and formal-legal methods for researching the content of powers to adopt a court judgement and exercise control over its execution made it possible to formulate conclusions regarding the scope of procedural actions of the court of first instance in administrative proceedings, the possibilities of improving the model for exercising judicial control over acts in public-legal authorities, correctness and timeliness of execution of court judgements taken against public law authorities in order to ensure that the weak side in administrative proceedings can be protected. The novelty of the work lies in the proof that in order to increase the effectiveness of the protection of the violated rights of individuals against unlawful acts of public authorities, it is necessary to improve the mechanism for the exercise by the court of powers to make a judgement and exercise control over implementing it.
topic administrative proceedings
court of first instance
astreinte
court decisions
control over the execution of court decisions
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/29/shsconf_rudnltmrp2021_03029.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kuliushinevgeniinikolaevich adoptionofajudgementandexercisingcontrolofitsperformancebyacourtinadministrativeproceedings
_version_ 1721195779147694080