The Externalization Component as the Locus of Specific Impairments

In the last years, Chomsky has defended a strong divide between a core, thought-related component of the faculty of language (FL), and a peripheral, sensory-motor dedicated one, in support of which he has mostly drawn from design and evolutionary arguments. This paper adds to these lines of reasonin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guillermo Lorenzo, Elena Vares
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Biolinguistics 2017-09-01
Series:Biolinguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/474
id doaj-4810e5422df144e1af5cda77dfb88af7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4810e5422df144e1af5cda77dfb88af72020-11-24T20:41:46ZengBiolinguisticsBiolinguistics1450-34172017-09-0111The Externalization Component as the Locus of Specific ImpairmentsGuillermo Lorenzo0Elena Vares1University of OviedoUniversity Schools GimbernatIn the last years, Chomsky has defended a strong divide between a core, thought-related component of the faculty of language (FL), and a peripheral, sensory-motor dedicated one, in support of which he has mostly drawn from design and evolutionary arguments. This paper adds to these lines of reasoning some evidence from forms of language impairment that, it is argued, may be understood as selectively affecting the latter component (Externalization). Previous accounts suggest that certain variants of specific language impairment (SLI) affect the Syntax–Phonology interface, including the Morphology component. The Linearization converter is also argued to be typically affected, so one might refer to such variants of SLI as instances of a specific externalization impairment (SEXTI). The data presented here suggest comprehension difficulties with object relative clauses in children with SLI, which, contrary to previous analyses, are argued to be due to linearization problems. The main objective of this paper is to illustrate how clinical linguistics may help to define aspects of the evolved linguistic phenotype, like the above-mentioned divide.https://www.biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/474ExternalizationLinearizationSpecific Language ImpairmentLanguage phenotype
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guillermo Lorenzo
Elena Vares
spellingShingle Guillermo Lorenzo
Elena Vares
The Externalization Component as the Locus of Specific Impairments
Biolinguistics
Externalization
Linearization
Specific Language Impairment
Language phenotype
author_facet Guillermo Lorenzo
Elena Vares
author_sort Guillermo Lorenzo
title The Externalization Component as the Locus of Specific Impairments
title_short The Externalization Component as the Locus of Specific Impairments
title_full The Externalization Component as the Locus of Specific Impairments
title_fullStr The Externalization Component as the Locus of Specific Impairments
title_full_unstemmed The Externalization Component as the Locus of Specific Impairments
title_sort externalization component as the locus of specific impairments
publisher Biolinguistics
series Biolinguistics
issn 1450-3417
publishDate 2017-09-01
description In the last years, Chomsky has defended a strong divide between a core, thought-related component of the faculty of language (FL), and a peripheral, sensory-motor dedicated one, in support of which he has mostly drawn from design and evolutionary arguments. This paper adds to these lines of reasoning some evidence from forms of language impairment that, it is argued, may be understood as selectively affecting the latter component (Externalization). Previous accounts suggest that certain variants of specific language impairment (SLI) affect the Syntax–Phonology interface, including the Morphology component. The Linearization converter is also argued to be typically affected, so one might refer to such variants of SLI as instances of a specific externalization impairment (SEXTI). The data presented here suggest comprehension difficulties with object relative clauses in children with SLI, which, contrary to previous analyses, are argued to be due to linearization problems. The main objective of this paper is to illustrate how clinical linguistics may help to define aspects of the evolved linguistic phenotype, like the above-mentioned divide.
topic Externalization
Linearization
Specific Language Impairment
Language phenotype
url https://www.biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/474
work_keys_str_mv AT guillermolorenzo theexternalizationcomponentasthelocusofspecificimpairments
AT elenavares theexternalizationcomponentasthelocusofspecificimpairments
AT guillermolorenzo externalizationcomponentasthelocusofspecificimpairments
AT elenavares externalizationcomponentasthelocusofspecificimpairments
_version_ 1716823965162274816