Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Cryotherapy Protocols in the Treatment of Common Viral Warts: A Prospective Observational Study

Background. Cryotherapy (freezing by liquid nitrogen) is an effective and widely used method for treatment of common warts. Patients often need multiple sessions at variable intervals. Protocols used by different dermatologists vary in terms of freezing time, the number of cycles, and the intervals...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jihan M. Muhaidat, Firas A. Al-qarqaz, Diala M. Alshiyab, Hadeel S. Alkofahi, Yousef Khader, Mawaddah Y. Ababneh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Dermatology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2309309
id doaj-480f2b0cb8ea4eb6a4c524974d6487be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-480f2b0cb8ea4eb6a4c524974d6487be2020-11-25T03:27:59ZengHindawi LimitedDermatology Research and Practice1687-61051687-61132020-01-01202010.1155/2020/23093092309309Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Cryotherapy Protocols in the Treatment of Common Viral Warts: A Prospective Observational StudyJihan M. Muhaidat0Firas A. Al-qarqaz1Diala M. Alshiyab2Hadeel S. Alkofahi3Yousef Khader4Mawaddah Y. Ababneh5Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanDepartment of Public Health, Community Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanBackground. Cryotherapy (freezing by liquid nitrogen) is an effective and widely used method for treatment of common warts. Patients often need multiple sessions at variable intervals. Protocols used by different dermatologists vary in terms of freezing time, the number of cycles, and the intervals between sessions. Aim. To compare the efficacy (cure rates) and safety (complications, early and late) of two cryotherapy treatment protocols for common viral warts. Method. A prospective observational study was conducted; it involved 80 patients with common warts on the hands and feet who were treated with cryotherapy done by two dermatologists who use different protocols; group 1 (45 patients) were treated by a single cycle of 10 seconds of freezing at 2 weekly intervals, and group 2 (35 patients) received a single cycle of 20 seconds of freezing at 4-weeks intervals. The two protocols were compared in terms of cure rate and complications 1-2 months after the final treatment. Recurrence rate and late complications were assessed at 9–12 months after the final treatment. Results. Group 1 patients achieved higher cure rate than group 2, 77.8% and 54.3%, respectively (P=0.001). Early (blistering) and late complications (dyspigmentation and scarring) were comparable in both groups. Pain score associated with protocol 1 (5.2/10) was less than protocol 2 (6.4/10) (P=0.004). Recurrence rate (17%) was comparable in both groups. Association between cure rate and duration of warts (P=0.022) and also association between cure rate and the mean number of warts (P=0.001) were demonstrated. Conclusions. Cryotherapy is an effective and safe treatment for common viral warts of hands and feet. The impact of shorter intervals on cure rate was more significant than increasing freezing time with longer intervals between freezing sessions. The study was approved by the local IRB committee (285-2018).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2309309
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jihan M. Muhaidat
Firas A. Al-qarqaz
Diala M. Alshiyab
Hadeel S. Alkofahi
Yousef Khader
Mawaddah Y. Ababneh
spellingShingle Jihan M. Muhaidat
Firas A. Al-qarqaz
Diala M. Alshiyab
Hadeel S. Alkofahi
Yousef Khader
Mawaddah Y. Ababneh
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Cryotherapy Protocols in the Treatment of Common Viral Warts: A Prospective Observational Study
Dermatology Research and Practice
author_facet Jihan M. Muhaidat
Firas A. Al-qarqaz
Diala M. Alshiyab
Hadeel S. Alkofahi
Yousef Khader
Mawaddah Y. Ababneh
author_sort Jihan M. Muhaidat
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Cryotherapy Protocols in the Treatment of Common Viral Warts: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Cryotherapy Protocols in the Treatment of Common Viral Warts: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Cryotherapy Protocols in the Treatment of Common Viral Warts: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Cryotherapy Protocols in the Treatment of Common Viral Warts: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Cryotherapy Protocols in the Treatment of Common Viral Warts: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of two cryotherapy protocols in the treatment of common viral warts: a prospective observational study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Dermatology Research and Practice
issn 1687-6105
1687-6113
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background. Cryotherapy (freezing by liquid nitrogen) is an effective and widely used method for treatment of common warts. Patients often need multiple sessions at variable intervals. Protocols used by different dermatologists vary in terms of freezing time, the number of cycles, and the intervals between sessions. Aim. To compare the efficacy (cure rates) and safety (complications, early and late) of two cryotherapy treatment protocols for common viral warts. Method. A prospective observational study was conducted; it involved 80 patients with common warts on the hands and feet who were treated with cryotherapy done by two dermatologists who use different protocols; group 1 (45 patients) were treated by a single cycle of 10 seconds of freezing at 2 weekly intervals, and group 2 (35 patients) received a single cycle of 20 seconds of freezing at 4-weeks intervals. The two protocols were compared in terms of cure rate and complications 1-2 months after the final treatment. Recurrence rate and late complications were assessed at 9–12 months after the final treatment. Results. Group 1 patients achieved higher cure rate than group 2, 77.8% and 54.3%, respectively (P=0.001). Early (blistering) and late complications (dyspigmentation and scarring) were comparable in both groups. Pain score associated with protocol 1 (5.2/10) was less than protocol 2 (6.4/10) (P=0.004). Recurrence rate (17%) was comparable in both groups. Association between cure rate and duration of warts (P=0.022) and also association between cure rate and the mean number of warts (P=0.001) were demonstrated. Conclusions. Cryotherapy is an effective and safe treatment for common viral warts of hands and feet. The impact of shorter intervals on cure rate was more significant than increasing freezing time with longer intervals between freezing sessions. The study was approved by the local IRB committee (285-2018).
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2309309
work_keys_str_mv AT jihanmmuhaidat comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwocryotherapyprotocolsinthetreatmentofcommonviralwartsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT firasaalqarqaz comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwocryotherapyprotocolsinthetreatmentofcommonviralwartsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dialamalshiyab comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwocryotherapyprotocolsinthetreatmentofcommonviralwartsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hadeelsalkofahi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwocryotherapyprotocolsinthetreatmentofcommonviralwartsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yousefkhader comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwocryotherapyprotocolsinthetreatmentofcommonviralwartsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mawaddahyababneh comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwocryotherapyprotocolsinthetreatmentofcommonviralwartsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
_version_ 1715207075967008768