Developing Ethics and Standards in Action Research

In a globalizing world, what role can social science research – particularly action research – play in order to address the risks of exclusion, poverty, social and physical insecurity and environmental deprivation? More specifically, how can this type of research be conducted in a participatory, res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ben Boog, Meindert Slagter, Jacques Zeelen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam 2008-12-01
Series:Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice
Online Access:http://www.journalsi.org/articles/10.18352/jsi.83/
id doaj-47feaef983ec4563a2c05a2cefd6e430
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47feaef983ec4563a2c05a2cefd6e4302020-11-25T04:02:23ZengUniversity of Applied Sciences RotterdamJournal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice1876-88302008-12-01174152810.18352/jsi.8378Developing Ethics and Standards in Action ResearchBen Boog0Meindert Slagter1Jacques Zeelen2Fontys University of Applied Sciences, TilburgUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social SciencesUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social SciencesIn a globalizing world, what role can social science research – particularly action research – play in order to address the risks of exclusion, poverty, social and physical insecurity and environmental deprivation? More specifically, how can this type of research be conducted in a participatory, responsible, transparent and scientific way? In other words: what about the ethics and standards in action research? This was the main focus of the World Congress on Action Research and Action Learning (August 2006) organized by the University of Groningen and the Higher Education Group of the Northern Netherlands. We begin by discussing the core characteristics of action research with reference to theory and practice. Reflection and action are key constituents of the process through the enactment of action research. The middle section draws upon the research findings presented at the congress and published in a book [B. Boog, J. Preece, M. Slagter and J. Zeelen (Eds.) (2008) Towards Quality Improvement of Action Research. Developing Ethics and Standards, Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers]. Citing authors who contributed chapters to the book mentioned above, we analyze four important subthemes: ‘participation, power and rapport’; ‘quality of research and quality management’; ‘learning to solve your own problems in complex responsive social systems, and ‘heuristics (rules of thumb) for action research practice’. Finally, we comment on possible quality improvements for action research. Our remarks relate to the problems of implementing the concept of participation, the ambition of action research to contribute to both knowledge production and social change and the need for systematic reconstruction (scientific validation) of action research.http://www.journalsi.org/articles/10.18352/jsi.83/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ben Boog
Meindert Slagter
Jacques Zeelen
spellingShingle Ben Boog
Meindert Slagter
Jacques Zeelen
Developing Ethics and Standards in Action Research
Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice
author_facet Ben Boog
Meindert Slagter
Jacques Zeelen
author_sort Ben Boog
title Developing Ethics and Standards in Action Research
title_short Developing Ethics and Standards in Action Research
title_full Developing Ethics and Standards in Action Research
title_fullStr Developing Ethics and Standards in Action Research
title_full_unstemmed Developing Ethics and Standards in Action Research
title_sort developing ethics and standards in action research
publisher University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam
series Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice
issn 1876-8830
publishDate 2008-12-01
description In a globalizing world, what role can social science research – particularly action research – play in order to address the risks of exclusion, poverty, social and physical insecurity and environmental deprivation? More specifically, how can this type of research be conducted in a participatory, responsible, transparent and scientific way? In other words: what about the ethics and standards in action research? This was the main focus of the World Congress on Action Research and Action Learning (August 2006) organized by the University of Groningen and the Higher Education Group of the Northern Netherlands. We begin by discussing the core characteristics of action research with reference to theory and practice. Reflection and action are key constituents of the process through the enactment of action research. The middle section draws upon the research findings presented at the congress and published in a book [B. Boog, J. Preece, M. Slagter and J. Zeelen (Eds.) (2008) Towards Quality Improvement of Action Research. Developing Ethics and Standards, Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers]. Citing authors who contributed chapters to the book mentioned above, we analyze four important subthemes: ‘participation, power and rapport’; ‘quality of research and quality management’; ‘learning to solve your own problems in complex responsive social systems, and ‘heuristics (rules of thumb) for action research practice’. Finally, we comment on possible quality improvements for action research. Our remarks relate to the problems of implementing the concept of participation, the ambition of action research to contribute to both knowledge production and social change and the need for systematic reconstruction (scientific validation) of action research.
url http://www.journalsi.org/articles/10.18352/jsi.83/
work_keys_str_mv AT benboog developingethicsandstandardsinactionresearch
AT meindertslagter developingethicsandstandardsinactionresearch
AT jacqueszeelen developingethicsandstandardsinactionresearch
_version_ 1724443182500937728