Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case

Experience shows that existing selections (particularly in Slovakia) of cadastral areas for land consolidation (LC) projects have been overwhelmingly subjective based on diverse sources of information, particular interests and the degree of LC’s popularity in different regions. Multi-crite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zlatica Muchová, František Petrovič
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2041
id doaj-47f098fbb7c4488d90b5055e2609bc9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47f098fbb7c4488d90b5055e2609bc9b2020-11-25T00:48:20ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01117204110.3390/su11072041su11072041Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian CaseZlatica Muchová0František Petrovič1Department of Landscape Planning and Land Consolidation, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, SlovakiaDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, SlovakiaExperience shows that existing selections (particularly in Slovakia) of cadastral areas for land consolidation (LC) projects have been overwhelmingly subjective based on diverse sources of information, particular interests and the degree of LC’s popularity in different regions. Multi-criteria evaluation and clustering may be an adequate, universal and yet an inexpensive solution as a semi-objective approach for selection and evaluation of land consolidation projects. Based on an analysis of parameters and data from 74 cadastral areas in the Žitava River basin in Slovakia, a set of criteria (geometrical, ownership/social, environmental, erosion, and morphology) and weights for them have been identified and combined into composite indices/criteria for designing a ranking system for LC prioritization and evaluation. However, they are universally applicable/adaptable, and are not limited to a particular territory or country. Presented results for finished projects in the case study area also verify that the selection process has been deeply unsatisfactory.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2041multi-criteria evaluationland consolidationproject tendersecologybenefitslandscape
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zlatica Muchová
František Petrovič
spellingShingle Zlatica Muchová
František Petrovič
Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case
Sustainability
multi-criteria evaluation
land consolidation
project tenders
ecology
benefits
landscape
author_facet Zlatica Muchová
František Petrovič
author_sort Zlatica Muchová
title Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case
title_short Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case
title_full Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case
title_fullStr Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case
title_full_unstemmed Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case
title_sort prioritization and evaluation of land consolidation projects—žitava river basin in a slovakian case
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Experience shows that existing selections (particularly in Slovakia) of cadastral areas for land consolidation (LC) projects have been overwhelmingly subjective based on diverse sources of information, particular interests and the degree of LC’s popularity in different regions. Multi-criteria evaluation and clustering may be an adequate, universal and yet an inexpensive solution as a semi-objective approach for selection and evaluation of land consolidation projects. Based on an analysis of parameters and data from 74 cadastral areas in the Žitava River basin in Slovakia, a set of criteria (geometrical, ownership/social, environmental, erosion, and morphology) and weights for them have been identified and combined into composite indices/criteria for designing a ranking system for LC prioritization and evaluation. However, they are universally applicable/adaptable, and are not limited to a particular territory or country. Presented results for finished projects in the case study area also verify that the selection process has been deeply unsatisfactory.
topic multi-criteria evaluation
land consolidation
project tenders
ecology
benefits
landscape
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2041
work_keys_str_mv AT zlaticamuchova prioritizationandevaluationoflandconsolidationprojectszitavariverbasininaslovakiancase
AT frantisekpetrovic prioritizationandevaluationoflandconsolidationprojectszitavariverbasininaslovakiancase
_version_ 1725256511473582080