Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case
Experience shows that existing selections (particularly in Slovakia) of cadastral areas for land consolidation (LC) projects have been overwhelmingly subjective based on diverse sources of information, particular interests and the degree of LC’s popularity in different regions. Multi-crite...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2041 |
id |
doaj-47f098fbb7c4488d90b5055e2609bc9b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-47f098fbb7c4488d90b5055e2609bc9b2020-11-25T00:48:20ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01117204110.3390/su11072041su11072041Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian CaseZlatica Muchová0František Petrovič1Department of Landscape Planning and Land Consolidation, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, SlovakiaDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, SlovakiaExperience shows that existing selections (particularly in Slovakia) of cadastral areas for land consolidation (LC) projects have been overwhelmingly subjective based on diverse sources of information, particular interests and the degree of LC’s popularity in different regions. Multi-criteria evaluation and clustering may be an adequate, universal and yet an inexpensive solution as a semi-objective approach for selection and evaluation of land consolidation projects. Based on an analysis of parameters and data from 74 cadastral areas in the Žitava River basin in Slovakia, a set of criteria (geometrical, ownership/social, environmental, erosion, and morphology) and weights for them have been identified and combined into composite indices/criteria for designing a ranking system for LC prioritization and evaluation. However, they are universally applicable/adaptable, and are not limited to a particular territory or country. Presented results for finished projects in the case study area also verify that the selection process has been deeply unsatisfactory.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2041multi-criteria evaluationland consolidationproject tendersecologybenefitslandscape |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zlatica Muchová František Petrovič |
spellingShingle |
Zlatica Muchová František Petrovič Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case Sustainability multi-criteria evaluation land consolidation project tenders ecology benefits landscape |
author_facet |
Zlatica Muchová František Petrovič |
author_sort |
Zlatica Muchová |
title |
Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case |
title_short |
Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case |
title_full |
Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case |
title_fullStr |
Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case |
title_sort |
prioritization and evaluation of land consolidation projects—žitava river basin in a slovakian case |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Experience shows that existing selections (particularly in Slovakia) of cadastral areas for land consolidation (LC) projects have been overwhelmingly subjective based on diverse sources of information, particular interests and the degree of LC’s popularity in different regions. Multi-criteria evaluation and clustering may be an adequate, universal and yet an inexpensive solution as a semi-objective approach for selection and evaluation of land consolidation projects. Based on an analysis of parameters and data from 74 cadastral areas in the Žitava River basin in Slovakia, a set of criteria (geometrical, ownership/social, environmental, erosion, and morphology) and weights for them have been identified and combined into composite indices/criteria for designing a ranking system for LC prioritization and evaluation. However, they are universally applicable/adaptable, and are not limited to a particular territory or country. Presented results for finished projects in the case study area also verify that the selection process has been deeply unsatisfactory. |
topic |
multi-criteria evaluation land consolidation project tenders ecology benefits landscape |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2041 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zlaticamuchova prioritizationandevaluationoflandconsolidationprojectszitavariverbasininaslovakiancase AT frantisekpetrovic prioritizationandevaluationoflandconsolidationprojectszitavariverbasininaslovakiancase |
_version_ |
1725256511473582080 |