National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization

Introduction: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits.Metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Honigman, Leah S., Wiler, Jennifer L., Rooks, Sean, Ginde, Adit A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2013-11-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1k92g70r
id doaj-47dfcc0caad8464eb3346a77d04f8fc4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47dfcc0caad8464eb3346a77d04f8fc42020-11-24T22:52:37ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182013-11-0114660961610.5811/westjem.2013.5.16112National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource UtilizationHonigman, Leah S.Wiler, Jennifer L.Rooks, SeanGinde, Adit A.Introduction: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits.Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2006-2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Urgency of visits was categorized using the assigned 5-level triage acuity score. We analyzed resource utilization, including diagnostic testing, treatment, and hospitalization within each acuity categorization.Results: From 2006-2009, 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-11.2) of United States ED visits were categorized as non-urgent. Most (87.8% [95%CI, 86.3-89.2]) non-urgent visits had some diagnostic testing or treatment in the ED. Imaging was common in non-urgent visits (29.8% [95%CI, 27.8-31.8]), although not as frequent as for IEU visits (52.9% [95%CI, 51.6-54.2]). Similarly, procedures were performed less frequently for non-urgent (34.1% [95%CI, 31.8-36.4]) compared to IEU visits (56.3% [95%CI, 53.5-59.0]). Medication administration was similar between the 2 groups (80.6% [95%CI, 79.5-81.7] vs. 76.3% [95% CI, 74.7-77.8], respectively). The rate of hospital admission was 4.0% (95%CI, 3.3-4.8) vs. 19.8% (95%CI, 18.4-21.3) for IEU visits, with admission to a critical care setting for 0.5% of non-urgent visits (95%CI, 0.3-0.6) vs. 3.4% (95%CI, 3.1-3.8) of IEU visits.Conclusions: For most non-urgent ED visits, some diagnostic or therapeutic intervention was performed. Relatively low, but notable proportions of non-urgent ED visits were admitted to the hospital, sometimes to a critical care setting. These data call into question non-urgent ED visits being categorized as “unnecessary,” particularly in the setting of limited access to timely primary care for acute illness or injury. [West J Emerg Med.609-616.]http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1k92g70rhealth policyhealth care utilizationemergency departmenttriageEmergency MedicineHealth Policy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Honigman, Leah S.
Wiler, Jennifer L.
Rooks, Sean
Ginde, Adit A.
spellingShingle Honigman, Leah S.
Wiler, Jennifer L.
Rooks, Sean
Ginde, Adit A.
National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
health policy
health care utilization
emergency department
triage
Emergency Medicine
Health Policy
author_facet Honigman, Leah S.
Wiler, Jennifer L.
Rooks, Sean
Ginde, Adit A.
author_sort Honigman, Leah S.
title National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization
title_short National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization
title_full National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization
title_fullStr National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization
title_full_unstemmed National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization
title_sort national study of non-urgent emergency department visits and associated resource utilization
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Introduction: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits.Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2006-2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Urgency of visits was categorized using the assigned 5-level triage acuity score. We analyzed resource utilization, including diagnostic testing, treatment, and hospitalization within each acuity categorization.Results: From 2006-2009, 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-11.2) of United States ED visits were categorized as non-urgent. Most (87.8% [95%CI, 86.3-89.2]) non-urgent visits had some diagnostic testing or treatment in the ED. Imaging was common in non-urgent visits (29.8% [95%CI, 27.8-31.8]), although not as frequent as for IEU visits (52.9% [95%CI, 51.6-54.2]). Similarly, procedures were performed less frequently for non-urgent (34.1% [95%CI, 31.8-36.4]) compared to IEU visits (56.3% [95%CI, 53.5-59.0]). Medication administration was similar between the 2 groups (80.6% [95%CI, 79.5-81.7] vs. 76.3% [95% CI, 74.7-77.8], respectively). The rate of hospital admission was 4.0% (95%CI, 3.3-4.8) vs. 19.8% (95%CI, 18.4-21.3) for IEU visits, with admission to a critical care setting for 0.5% of non-urgent visits (95%CI, 0.3-0.6) vs. 3.4% (95%CI, 3.1-3.8) of IEU visits.Conclusions: For most non-urgent ED visits, some diagnostic or therapeutic intervention was performed. Relatively low, but notable proportions of non-urgent ED visits were admitted to the hospital, sometimes to a critical care setting. These data call into question non-urgent ED visits being categorized as “unnecessary,” particularly in the setting of limited access to timely primary care for acute illness or injury. [West J Emerg Med.609-616.]
topic health policy
health care utilization
emergency department
triage
Emergency Medicine
Health Policy
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1k92g70r
work_keys_str_mv AT honigmanleahs nationalstudyofnonurgentemergencydepartmentvisitsandassociatedresourceutilization
AT wilerjenniferl nationalstudyofnonurgentemergencydepartmentvisitsandassociatedresourceutilization
AT rookssean nationalstudyofnonurgentemergencydepartmentvisitsandassociatedresourceutilization
AT gindeadita nationalstudyofnonurgentemergencydepartmentvisitsandassociatedresourceutilization
_version_ 1725665389219676160