National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization
Introduction: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits.Metho...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California
2013-11-01
|
Series: | Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1k92g70r |
id |
doaj-47dfcc0caad8464eb3346a77d04f8fc4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-47dfcc0caad8464eb3346a77d04f8fc42020-11-24T22:52:37ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182013-11-0114660961610.5811/westjem.2013.5.16112National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource UtilizationHonigman, Leah S.Wiler, Jennifer L.Rooks, SeanGinde, Adit A.Introduction: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits.Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2006-2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Urgency of visits was categorized using the assigned 5-level triage acuity score. We analyzed resource utilization, including diagnostic testing, treatment, and hospitalization within each acuity categorization.Results: From 2006-2009, 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-11.2) of United States ED visits were categorized as non-urgent. Most (87.8% [95%CI, 86.3-89.2]) non-urgent visits had some diagnostic testing or treatment in the ED. Imaging was common in non-urgent visits (29.8% [95%CI, 27.8-31.8]), although not as frequent as for IEU visits (52.9% [95%CI, 51.6-54.2]). Similarly, procedures were performed less frequently for non-urgent (34.1% [95%CI, 31.8-36.4]) compared to IEU visits (56.3% [95%CI, 53.5-59.0]). Medication administration was similar between the 2 groups (80.6% [95%CI, 79.5-81.7] vs. 76.3% [95% CI, 74.7-77.8], respectively). The rate of hospital admission was 4.0% (95%CI, 3.3-4.8) vs. 19.8% (95%CI, 18.4-21.3) for IEU visits, with admission to a critical care setting for 0.5% of non-urgent visits (95%CI, 0.3-0.6) vs. 3.4% (95%CI, 3.1-3.8) of IEU visits.Conclusions: For most non-urgent ED visits, some diagnostic or therapeutic intervention was performed. Relatively low, but notable proportions of non-urgent ED visits were admitted to the hospital, sometimes to a critical care setting. These data call into question non-urgent ED visits being categorized as “unnecessary,” particularly in the setting of limited access to timely primary care for acute illness or injury. [West J Emerg Med.609-616.]http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1k92g70rhealth policyhealth care utilizationemergency departmenttriageEmergency MedicineHealth Policy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Honigman, Leah S. Wiler, Jennifer L. Rooks, Sean Ginde, Adit A. |
spellingShingle |
Honigman, Leah S. Wiler, Jennifer L. Rooks, Sean Ginde, Adit A. National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization Western Journal of Emergency Medicine health policy health care utilization emergency department triage Emergency Medicine Health Policy |
author_facet |
Honigman, Leah S. Wiler, Jennifer L. Rooks, Sean Ginde, Adit A. |
author_sort |
Honigman, Leah S. |
title |
National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization |
title_short |
National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization |
title_full |
National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization |
title_fullStr |
National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization |
title_full_unstemmed |
National Study of Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization |
title_sort |
national study of non-urgent emergency department visits and associated resource utilization |
publisher |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
series |
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
issn |
1936-900X 1936-9018 |
publishDate |
2013-11-01 |
description |
Introduction: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits.Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2006-2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Urgency of visits was categorized using the assigned 5-level triage acuity score. We analyzed resource utilization, including diagnostic testing, treatment, and hospitalization within each acuity categorization.Results: From 2006-2009, 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-11.2) of United States ED visits were categorized as non-urgent. Most (87.8% [95%CI, 86.3-89.2]) non-urgent visits had some diagnostic testing or treatment in the ED. Imaging was common in non-urgent visits (29.8% [95%CI, 27.8-31.8]), although not as frequent as for IEU visits (52.9% [95%CI, 51.6-54.2]). Similarly, procedures were performed less frequently for non-urgent (34.1% [95%CI, 31.8-36.4]) compared to IEU visits (56.3% [95%CI, 53.5-59.0]). Medication administration was similar between the 2 groups (80.6% [95%CI, 79.5-81.7] vs. 76.3% [95% CI, 74.7-77.8], respectively). The rate of hospital admission was 4.0% (95%CI, 3.3-4.8) vs. 19.8% (95%CI, 18.4-21.3) for IEU visits, with admission to a critical care setting for 0.5% of non-urgent visits (95%CI, 0.3-0.6) vs. 3.4% (95%CI, 3.1-3.8) of IEU visits.Conclusions: For most non-urgent ED visits, some diagnostic or therapeutic intervention was performed. Relatively low, but notable proportions of non-urgent ED visits were admitted to the hospital, sometimes to a critical care setting. These data call into question non-urgent ED visits being categorized as “unnecessary,” particularly in the setting of limited access to timely primary care for acute illness or injury. [West J Emerg Med.609-616.] |
topic |
health policy health care utilization emergency department triage Emergency Medicine Health Policy |
url |
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1k92g70r |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT honigmanleahs nationalstudyofnonurgentemergencydepartmentvisitsandassociatedresourceutilization AT wilerjenniferl nationalstudyofnonurgentemergencydepartmentvisitsandassociatedresourceutilization AT rookssean nationalstudyofnonurgentemergencydepartmentvisitsandassociatedresourceutilization AT gindeadita nationalstudyofnonurgentemergencydepartmentvisitsandassociatedresourceutilization |
_version_ |
1725665389219676160 |