The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Discrepancies between the conclusions of different meta-analyses (quantitative syntheses of systematic reviews) are often ascribed to methodological differences. The objective of this study was to determine the discordance in interpr...
Main Authors: | Eisenberg Mark J, Carnevale Franco, Brophy James M, Steele Russell J, Platt Robert W, Boivin Jean-François, Shrier Ian, Furlan Andrea, Kakuma Ritsuko, Macdonald Mary, Pilote Louise, Rossignol Michel |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2008-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/8/19 |
Similar Items
-
Utilization of health services for depression and anxiety in Ontario: an eleven-year comparison of determinants
by: Kakuma, Ritsuko
Published: (2008) -
Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs
by: Platt Robert W, et al.
Published: (2008-10-01) -
A Causal Inference Approach to Network Meta-Analysis
by: Schnitzer Mireille E, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01) -
One-year test-retest reliability of ten vision tests in Canadian athletes [version 5; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Mehdi Aloosh, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Power, reliability, and heterogeneous results.
by: Ian Shrier
Published: (2005-11-01)