“A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in Dhaka

With many cities in the Global South experiencing immense growth in informal settlements, city authorities frequently try to assert control over these settlements and their inhabitants through coercive measures such as threats of eviction, exclusion, blocked access to services and other forms of str...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kazi Nazrul Fattah, Peter Walters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020-02-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2318
id doaj-47d9cc7ac63f41e68136b7fe7dbaf0b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47d9cc7ac63f41e68136b7fe7dbaf0b52020-11-24T23:58:55ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032020-02-0181556510.17645/si.v8i1.23181313“A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in DhakaKazi Nazrul Fattah0Peter Walters1School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Social Science, The University of Queensland, AustraliaWith many cities in the Global South experiencing immense growth in informal settlements, city authorities frequently try to assert control over these settlements and their inhabitants through coercive measures such as threats of eviction, exclusion, blocked access to services and other forms of structural violence. Such coercive control is legitimized through the discursive formation of informal settlements as criminal and unsanitary, and of the residents as migrants and as temporary and illegitimate settlers. Using findings from ethnographic research carried out in two informal settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh, this article explores how informal settlement residents engage with and resist territorial stigma in a rapidly growing Southern megacity. Findings show residents resist stigmatising narratives of neighbourhood blame by constructing counternarratives that frame informal settlements as a “good place for the poor.” These place-based narratives emerge from shared experiences of informality and associational life in a city where such populations are needed yet unwanted. While residents of these neighbourhoods are acutely aware of the temporariness and illegality of unauthorised settlements, these narratives produce solidarities to resist eviction and serve to legitimise their claim to the city.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2318counternarrativesdhakainformal settlementsmegacityterritorial stigma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kazi Nazrul Fattah
Peter Walters
spellingShingle Kazi Nazrul Fattah
Peter Walters
“A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in Dhaka
Social Inclusion
counternarratives
dhaka
informal settlements
megacity
territorial stigma
author_facet Kazi Nazrul Fattah
Peter Walters
author_sort Kazi Nazrul Fattah
title “A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in Dhaka
title_short “A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in Dhaka
title_full “A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in Dhaka
title_fullStr “A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in Dhaka
title_full_unstemmed “A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in Dhaka
title_sort “a good place for the poor!” counternarratives to territorial stigmatisation from two informal settlements in dhaka
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2020-02-01
description With many cities in the Global South experiencing immense growth in informal settlements, city authorities frequently try to assert control over these settlements and their inhabitants through coercive measures such as threats of eviction, exclusion, blocked access to services and other forms of structural violence. Such coercive control is legitimized through the discursive formation of informal settlements as criminal and unsanitary, and of the residents as migrants and as temporary and illegitimate settlers. Using findings from ethnographic research carried out in two informal settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh, this article explores how informal settlement residents engage with and resist territorial stigma in a rapidly growing Southern megacity. Findings show residents resist stigmatising narratives of neighbourhood blame by constructing counternarratives that frame informal settlements as a “good place for the poor.” These place-based narratives emerge from shared experiences of informality and associational life in a city where such populations are needed yet unwanted. While residents of these neighbourhoods are acutely aware of the temporariness and illegality of unauthorised settlements, these narratives produce solidarities to resist eviction and serve to legitimise their claim to the city.
topic counternarratives
dhaka
informal settlements
megacity
territorial stigma
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2318
work_keys_str_mv AT kazinazrulfattah agoodplaceforthepoorcounternarrativestoterritorialstigmatisationfromtwoinformalsettlementsindhaka
AT peterwalters agoodplaceforthepoorcounternarrativestoterritorialstigmatisationfromtwoinformalsettlementsindhaka
_version_ 1725448962653028352