Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
Abstract Introduction Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. Methods This retrospective study w...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3 |
id |
doaj-47c964175cd44a1a917b5817d9dfed04 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-47c964175cd44a1a917b5817d9dfed042021-01-31T16:07:23ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-01-012111810.1186/s12891-020-3065-3Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?Ulrich J. Spiegl0Annette B. Ahrberg1Christine Anemüller2Jan-Sven Jarvers3Stefan Glasmacher4Nicolaus von der Höh5Christoph Josten6Christoph-Eckhard Heyde7Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigAbstract Introduction Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. Methods This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center. Patients aged 61 and older were stabilized using hybrid stabilization after suffering acute and unstable osteoporotic vertebral body fractures at the thoracolumbar spine. Posterior stabilization was done short-segmental and minimal invasive with cement-augmentation of all pedicle screws. The minimum follow-up has been 2 years. The outcome parameters were the reduction loss and the relative loss of height of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the fractured vertebral body and a reference disc (intervertebral disc superior of the stabilization) between the postoperative and latest lateral radiographs. Additionally, implant positioning and loosening was analyzed. Results 29 mainly female (72%) patients (73.3 ± 6.0 years) were included. Fractures consisted of 26 incomplete burst fractures and 3 complete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (Th11 – L2: 86%) and the midlumbar spine. The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range: 24–58 months). The mean reduction loss was 7.7° (range: 1–25). The relative loss of heights of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the reference disc, and the central vertebral body were significant. Thereby, the relative loss of the superior disc height was significant higher compared to the reference disc. Additionally, only the relative loss of central vertebral body height and reduction loss correlated significantly. There were no signs of implant loosening in any patient. Conclusions The mean reduction loss was moderate 3 years after hybrid stabilization of unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A significant loss of both adjacent disc heights and the central vertebral body was seen, with the highest loss in the superior adjacent disc significantly outranging the reference disc. The superior adjacent intervertebral disc and the central part of the fractured vertebral body seem to be responsible for the majority of reduction loss.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3Hybrid stabilizationOsteoporotic vertebral fractureReduction lossIntervertebral discThoracolumbar spine |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ulrich J. Spiegl Annette B. Ahrberg Christine Anemüller Jan-Sven Jarvers Stefan Glasmacher Nicolaus von der Höh Christoph Josten Christoph-Eckhard Heyde |
spellingShingle |
Ulrich J. Spiegl Annette B. Ahrberg Christine Anemüller Jan-Sven Jarvers Stefan Glasmacher Nicolaus von der Höh Christoph Josten Christoph-Eckhard Heyde Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Hybrid stabilization Osteoporotic vertebral fracture Reduction loss Intervertebral disc Thoracolumbar spine |
author_facet |
Ulrich J. Spiegl Annette B. Ahrberg Christine Anemüller Jan-Sven Jarvers Stefan Glasmacher Nicolaus von der Höh Christoph Josten Christoph-Eckhard Heyde |
author_sort |
Ulrich J. Spiegl |
title |
Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_short |
Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_full |
Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_fullStr |
Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_sort |
which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Introduction Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. Methods This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center. Patients aged 61 and older were stabilized using hybrid stabilization after suffering acute and unstable osteoporotic vertebral body fractures at the thoracolumbar spine. Posterior stabilization was done short-segmental and minimal invasive with cement-augmentation of all pedicle screws. The minimum follow-up has been 2 years. The outcome parameters were the reduction loss and the relative loss of height of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the fractured vertebral body and a reference disc (intervertebral disc superior of the stabilization) between the postoperative and latest lateral radiographs. Additionally, implant positioning and loosening was analyzed. Results 29 mainly female (72%) patients (73.3 ± 6.0 years) were included. Fractures consisted of 26 incomplete burst fractures and 3 complete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (Th11 – L2: 86%) and the midlumbar spine. The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range: 24–58 months). The mean reduction loss was 7.7° (range: 1–25). The relative loss of heights of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the reference disc, and the central vertebral body were significant. Thereby, the relative loss of the superior disc height was significant higher compared to the reference disc. Additionally, only the relative loss of central vertebral body height and reduction loss correlated significantly. There were no signs of implant loosening in any patient. Conclusions The mean reduction loss was moderate 3 years after hybrid stabilization of unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A significant loss of both adjacent disc heights and the central vertebral body was seen, with the highest loss in the superior adjacent disc significantly outranging the reference disc. The superior adjacent intervertebral disc and the central part of the fractured vertebral body seem to be responsible for the majority of reduction loss. |
topic |
Hybrid stabilization Osteoporotic vertebral fracture Reduction loss Intervertebral disc Thoracolumbar spine |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ulrichjspiegl whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT annettebahrberg whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT christineanemuller whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT jansvenjarvers whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT stefanglasmacher whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT nicolausvonderhoh whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT christophjosten whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT christopheckhardheyde whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine |
_version_ |
1724316835507077120 |