Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?

Abstract Introduction Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. Methods This retrospective study w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ulrich J. Spiegl, Annette B. Ahrberg, Christine Anemüller, Jan-Sven Jarvers, Stefan Glasmacher, Nicolaus von der Höh, Christoph Josten, Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-01-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3
id doaj-47c964175cd44a1a917b5817d9dfed04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47c964175cd44a1a917b5817d9dfed042021-01-31T16:07:23ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-01-012111810.1186/s12891-020-3065-3Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?Ulrich J. Spiegl0Annette B. Ahrberg1Christine Anemüller2Jan-Sven Jarvers3Stefan Glasmacher4Nicolaus von der Höh5Christoph Josten6Christoph-Eckhard Heyde7Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of LeipzigAbstract Introduction Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. Methods This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center. Patients aged 61 and older were stabilized using hybrid stabilization after suffering acute and unstable osteoporotic vertebral body fractures at the thoracolumbar spine. Posterior stabilization was done short-segmental and minimal invasive with cement-augmentation of all pedicle screws. The minimum follow-up has been 2 years. The outcome parameters were the reduction loss and the relative loss of height of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the fractured vertebral body and a reference disc (intervertebral disc superior of the stabilization) between the postoperative and latest lateral radiographs. Additionally, implant positioning and loosening was analyzed. Results 29 mainly female (72%) patients (73.3 ± 6.0 years) were included. Fractures consisted of 26 incomplete burst fractures and 3 complete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (Th11 – L2: 86%) and the midlumbar spine. The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range: 24–58 months). The mean reduction loss was 7.7° (range: 1–25). The relative loss of heights of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the reference disc, and the central vertebral body were significant. Thereby, the relative loss of the superior disc height was significant higher compared to the reference disc. Additionally, only the relative loss of central vertebral body height and reduction loss correlated significantly. There were no signs of implant loosening in any patient. Conclusions The mean reduction loss was moderate 3 years after hybrid stabilization of unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A significant loss of both adjacent disc heights and the central vertebral body was seen, with the highest loss in the superior adjacent disc significantly outranging the reference disc. The superior adjacent intervertebral disc and the central part of the fractured vertebral body seem to be responsible for the majority of reduction loss.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3Hybrid stabilizationOsteoporotic vertebral fractureReduction lossIntervertebral discThoracolumbar spine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ulrich J. Spiegl
Annette B. Ahrberg
Christine Anemüller
Jan-Sven Jarvers
Stefan Glasmacher
Nicolaus von der Höh
Christoph Josten
Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
spellingShingle Ulrich J. Spiegl
Annette B. Ahrberg
Christine Anemüller
Jan-Sven Jarvers
Stefan Glasmacher
Nicolaus von der Höh
Christoph Josten
Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Hybrid stabilization
Osteoporotic vertebral fracture
Reduction loss
Intervertebral disc
Thoracolumbar spine
author_facet Ulrich J. Spiegl
Annette B. Ahrberg
Christine Anemüller
Jan-Sven Jarvers
Stefan Glasmacher
Nicolaus von der Höh
Christoph Josten
Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
author_sort Ulrich J. Spiegl
title Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
title_short Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
title_full Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
title_fullStr Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
title_full_unstemmed Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
title_sort which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Introduction Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. Methods This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center. Patients aged 61 and older were stabilized using hybrid stabilization after suffering acute and unstable osteoporotic vertebral body fractures at the thoracolumbar spine. Posterior stabilization was done short-segmental and minimal invasive with cement-augmentation of all pedicle screws. The minimum follow-up has been 2 years. The outcome parameters were the reduction loss and the relative loss of height of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the fractured vertebral body and a reference disc (intervertebral disc superior of the stabilization) between the postoperative and latest lateral radiographs. Additionally, implant positioning and loosening was analyzed. Results 29 mainly female (72%) patients (73.3 ± 6.0 years) were included. Fractures consisted of 26 incomplete burst fractures and 3 complete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (Th11 – L2: 86%) and the midlumbar spine. The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range: 24–58 months). The mean reduction loss was 7.7° (range: 1–25). The relative loss of heights of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the reference disc, and the central vertebral body were significant. Thereby, the relative loss of the superior disc height was significant higher compared to the reference disc. Additionally, only the relative loss of central vertebral body height and reduction loss correlated significantly. There were no signs of implant loosening in any patient. Conclusions The mean reduction loss was moderate 3 years after hybrid stabilization of unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A significant loss of both adjacent disc heights and the central vertebral body was seen, with the highest loss in the superior adjacent disc significantly outranging the reference disc. The superior adjacent intervertebral disc and the central part of the fractured vertebral body seem to be responsible for the majority of reduction loss.
topic Hybrid stabilization
Osteoporotic vertebral fracture
Reduction loss
Intervertebral disc
Thoracolumbar spine
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ulrichjspiegl whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine
AT annettebahrberg whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine
AT christineanemuller whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine
AT jansvenjarvers whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine
AT stefanglasmacher whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine
AT nicolausvonderhoh whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine
AT christophjosten whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine
AT christopheckhardheyde whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine
_version_ 1724316835507077120