Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity
Background Tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurement is limited by low tumor purity of samples, which can influence prediction of the immunotherapy response, particularly when using whole-exome sequencing-based TMB (wTMB). This issue could be overcome by targeted panel sequencing-based TMB (pTMB) wi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer |
Online Access: | https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001199.full |
id |
doaj-47c869a682954a4b8cfd17be6e159c27 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sehhoon Park Se-Hoon Lee Jin Seok Ahn Myung-Ju Ahn Keunchil Park Jong-Mu Sun Boram Lee Tae Hee Hong Hongui Cha Joon Ho Shim Jongsuk Chung Chung Lee Yoon-La Choi Soohyun Hwang Yoomi Lee Hyun Ae Jung Ji-Yeon Kim Yeon Hee Park |
spellingShingle |
Sehhoon Park Se-Hoon Lee Jin Seok Ahn Myung-Ju Ahn Keunchil Park Jong-Mu Sun Boram Lee Tae Hee Hong Hongui Cha Joon Ho Shim Jongsuk Chung Chung Lee Yoon-La Choi Soohyun Hwang Yoomi Lee Hyun Ae Jung Ji-Yeon Kim Yeon Hee Park Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer |
author_facet |
Sehhoon Park Se-Hoon Lee Jin Seok Ahn Myung-Ju Ahn Keunchil Park Jong-Mu Sun Boram Lee Tae Hee Hong Hongui Cha Joon Ho Shim Jongsuk Chung Chung Lee Yoon-La Choi Soohyun Hwang Yoomi Lee Hyun Ae Jung Ji-Yeon Kim Yeon Hee Park |
author_sort |
Sehhoon Park |
title |
Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity |
title_short |
Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity |
title_full |
Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity |
title_fullStr |
Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity |
title_sort |
clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer |
issn |
2051-1426 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Background Tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurement is limited by low tumor purity of samples, which can influence prediction of the immunotherapy response, particularly when using whole-exome sequencing-based TMB (wTMB). This issue could be overcome by targeted panel sequencing-based TMB (pTMB) with higher depth of coverage, which remains unexplored.Methods We comprehensively reanalyzed four public datasets of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated cohorts (adopting pTMB or wTMB) to test each biomarker’s predictive ability for low purity samples (cut-off: 30%). For validation, paired genomic profiling with the same tumor specimens was performed to directly compare wTMB and pTMB in patients with breast cancer (paired-BRCA, n=165) and ICI-treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (paired-NSCLC, n=156).Results Low tumor purity was common (range 30%–45%) in real-world samples from ICI-treated patients. In the survival analyzes of public cohorts, wTMB could not predict the clinical benefit of immunotherapy when tumor purity was low (log-rank p=0.874), whereas pTMB could effectively stratify the survival outcome (log-rank p=0.020). In the paired-BRCA and paired-NSCLC cohorts, pTMB was less affected by tumor purity, with significantly more somatic variants identified at low allele frequency (p<0.001). We found that wTMB was significantly underestimated in low purity samples with a large proportion of clonal variants undetected by whole-exome sequencing. Interestingly, pTMB more accurately predicted progression-free survival (PFS) after immunotherapy than wTMB owing to its superior performance in the low tumor purity subgroup (p=0.054 vs p=0.358). Multivariate analysis revealed pTMB (p=0.016), but not wTMB (p=0.32), as an independent predictor of PFS even in low-purity samples. The net reclassification index using pTMB was 21.7% in the low-purity subgroup (p=0.016).Conclusions Our data suggest that TMB characterization with targeted deep sequencing might have potential strength in predicting ICI responsiveness due to its enhanced sensitivity for hard-to-detect variants at low-allele fraction. Therefore, pTMB could act as an invaluable biomarker in the setting of both clinical trials and practice outside of trials based on its reliable performance in mitigating the purity-related bias. |
url |
https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001199.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sehhoonpark clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT sehoonlee clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT jinseokahn clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT myungjuahn clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT keunchilpark clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT jongmusun clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT boramlee clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT taeheehong clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT honguicha clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT joonhoshim clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT jongsukchung clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT chunglee clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT yoonlachoi clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT soohyunhwang clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT yoomilee clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT hyunaejung clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT jiyeonkim clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity AT yeonheepark clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity |
_version_ |
1721305262499823616 |
spelling |
doaj-47c869a682954a4b8cfd17be6e159c272021-07-13T15:01:47ZengBMJ Publishing GroupJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer2051-14262020-07-018210.1136/jitc-2020-001199Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor puritySehhoon Park0Se-Hoon Lee1Jin Seok Ahn2Myung-Ju Ahn3Keunchil Park4Jong-Mu Sun5Boram Lee6Tae Hee Hong7Hongui Cha8Joon Ho Shim9Jongsuk Chung10Chung Lee11Yoon-La Choi12Soohyun Hwang13Yoomi Lee14Hyun Ae Jung15Ji-Yeon Kim16Yeon Hee Park17Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health—Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USASamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, KoreaSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, KoreaGENINUS Inc, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Pathology and Translational Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaBackground Tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurement is limited by low tumor purity of samples, which can influence prediction of the immunotherapy response, particularly when using whole-exome sequencing-based TMB (wTMB). This issue could be overcome by targeted panel sequencing-based TMB (pTMB) with higher depth of coverage, which remains unexplored.Methods We comprehensively reanalyzed four public datasets of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated cohorts (adopting pTMB or wTMB) to test each biomarker’s predictive ability for low purity samples (cut-off: 30%). For validation, paired genomic profiling with the same tumor specimens was performed to directly compare wTMB and pTMB in patients with breast cancer (paired-BRCA, n=165) and ICI-treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (paired-NSCLC, n=156).Results Low tumor purity was common (range 30%–45%) in real-world samples from ICI-treated patients. In the survival analyzes of public cohorts, wTMB could not predict the clinical benefit of immunotherapy when tumor purity was low (log-rank p=0.874), whereas pTMB could effectively stratify the survival outcome (log-rank p=0.020). In the paired-BRCA and paired-NSCLC cohorts, pTMB was less affected by tumor purity, with significantly more somatic variants identified at low allele frequency (p<0.001). We found that wTMB was significantly underestimated in low purity samples with a large proportion of clonal variants undetected by whole-exome sequencing. Interestingly, pTMB more accurately predicted progression-free survival (PFS) after immunotherapy than wTMB owing to its superior performance in the low tumor purity subgroup (p=0.054 vs p=0.358). Multivariate analysis revealed pTMB (p=0.016), but not wTMB (p=0.32), as an independent predictor of PFS even in low-purity samples. The net reclassification index using pTMB was 21.7% in the low-purity subgroup (p=0.016).Conclusions Our data suggest that TMB characterization with targeted deep sequencing might have potential strength in predicting ICI responsiveness due to its enhanced sensitivity for hard-to-detect variants at low-allele fraction. Therefore, pTMB could act as an invaluable biomarker in the setting of both clinical trials and practice outside of trials based on its reliable performance in mitigating the purity-related bias.https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001199.full |