Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity

Background Tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurement is limited by low tumor purity of samples, which can influence prediction of the immunotherapy response, particularly when using whole-exome sequencing-based TMB (wTMB). This issue could be overcome by targeted panel sequencing-based TMB (pTMB) wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sehhoon Park, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn, Keunchil Park, Jong-Mu Sun, Boram Lee, Tae Hee Hong, Hongui Cha, Joon Ho Shim, Jongsuk Chung, Chung Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Soohyun Hwang, Yoomi Lee, Hyun Ae Jung, Ji-Yeon Kim, Yeon Hee Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-01
Series:Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Online Access:https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001199.full
id doaj-47c869a682954a4b8cfd17be6e159c27
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sehhoon Park
Se-Hoon Lee
Jin Seok Ahn
Myung-Ju Ahn
Keunchil Park
Jong-Mu Sun
Boram Lee
Tae Hee Hong
Hongui Cha
Joon Ho Shim
Jongsuk Chung
Chung Lee
Yoon-La Choi
Soohyun Hwang
Yoomi Lee
Hyun Ae Jung
Ji-Yeon Kim
Yeon Hee Park
spellingShingle Sehhoon Park
Se-Hoon Lee
Jin Seok Ahn
Myung-Ju Ahn
Keunchil Park
Jong-Mu Sun
Boram Lee
Tae Hee Hong
Hongui Cha
Joon Ho Shim
Jongsuk Chung
Chung Lee
Yoon-La Choi
Soohyun Hwang
Yoomi Lee
Hyun Ae Jung
Ji-Yeon Kim
Yeon Hee Park
Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
author_facet Sehhoon Park
Se-Hoon Lee
Jin Seok Ahn
Myung-Ju Ahn
Keunchil Park
Jong-Mu Sun
Boram Lee
Tae Hee Hong
Hongui Cha
Joon Ho Shim
Jongsuk Chung
Chung Lee
Yoon-La Choi
Soohyun Hwang
Yoomi Lee
Hyun Ae Jung
Ji-Yeon Kim
Yeon Hee Park
author_sort Sehhoon Park
title Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity
title_short Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity
title_full Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity
title_fullStr Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity
title_full_unstemmed Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity
title_sort clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor purity
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
issn 2051-1426
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Background Tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurement is limited by low tumor purity of samples, which can influence prediction of the immunotherapy response, particularly when using whole-exome sequencing-based TMB (wTMB). This issue could be overcome by targeted panel sequencing-based TMB (pTMB) with higher depth of coverage, which remains unexplored.Methods We comprehensively reanalyzed four public datasets of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated cohorts (adopting pTMB or wTMB) to test each biomarker’s predictive ability for low purity samples (cut-off: 30%). For validation, paired genomic profiling with the same tumor specimens was performed to directly compare wTMB and pTMB in patients with breast cancer (paired-BRCA, n=165) and ICI-treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (paired-NSCLC, n=156).Results Low tumor purity was common (range 30%–45%) in real-world samples from ICI-treated patients. In the survival analyzes of public cohorts, wTMB could not predict the clinical benefit of immunotherapy when tumor purity was low (log-rank p=0.874), whereas pTMB could effectively stratify the survival outcome (log-rank p=0.020). In the paired-BRCA and paired-NSCLC cohorts, pTMB was less affected by tumor purity, with significantly more somatic variants identified at low allele frequency (p<0.001). We found that wTMB was significantly underestimated in low purity samples with a large proportion of clonal variants undetected by whole-exome sequencing. Interestingly, pTMB more accurately predicted progression-free survival (PFS) after immunotherapy than wTMB owing to its superior performance in the low tumor purity subgroup (p=0.054 vs p=0.358). Multivariate analysis revealed pTMB (p=0.016), but not wTMB (p=0.32), as an independent predictor of PFS even in low-purity samples. The net reclassification index using pTMB was 21.7% in the low-purity subgroup (p=0.016).Conclusions Our data suggest that TMB characterization with targeted deep sequencing might have potential strength in predicting ICI responsiveness due to its enhanced sensitivity for hard-to-detect variants at low-allele fraction. Therefore, pTMB could act as an invaluable biomarker in the setting of both clinical trials and practice outside of trials based on its reliable performance in mitigating the purity-related bias.
url https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001199.full
work_keys_str_mv AT sehhoonpark clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT sehoonlee clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT jinseokahn clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT myungjuahn clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT keunchilpark clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT jongmusun clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT boramlee clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT taeheehong clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT honguicha clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT joonhoshim clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT jongsukchung clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT chunglee clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT yoonlachoi clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT soohyunhwang clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT yoomilee clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT hyunaejung clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT jiyeonkim clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
AT yeonheepark clinicaladvantageoftargetedsequencingforunbiasedtumormutationalburdenestimationinsampleswithlowtumorpurity
_version_ 1721305262499823616
spelling doaj-47c869a682954a4b8cfd17be6e159c272021-07-13T15:01:47ZengBMJ Publishing GroupJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer2051-14262020-07-018210.1136/jitc-2020-001199Clinical advantage of targeted sequencing for unbiased tumor mutational burden estimation in samples with low tumor puritySehhoon Park0Se-Hoon Lee1Jin Seok Ahn2Myung-Ju Ahn3Keunchil Park4Jong-Mu Sun5Boram Lee6Tae Hee Hong7Hongui Cha8Joon Ho Shim9Jongsuk Chung10Chung Lee11Yoon-La Choi12Soohyun Hwang13Yoomi Lee14Hyun Ae Jung15Ji-Yeon Kim16Yeon Hee Park17Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Aff1 0000 0001 2181 989Xgrid.264381.aDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu 60351 Seoul Republic of Korea Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health—Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USASamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, KoreaSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, KoreaGENINUS Inc, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Pathology and Translational Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaBackground Tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurement is limited by low tumor purity of samples, which can influence prediction of the immunotherapy response, particularly when using whole-exome sequencing-based TMB (wTMB). This issue could be overcome by targeted panel sequencing-based TMB (pTMB) with higher depth of coverage, which remains unexplored.Methods We comprehensively reanalyzed four public datasets of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated cohorts (adopting pTMB or wTMB) to test each biomarker’s predictive ability for low purity samples (cut-off: 30%). For validation, paired genomic profiling with the same tumor specimens was performed to directly compare wTMB and pTMB in patients with breast cancer (paired-BRCA, n=165) and ICI-treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (paired-NSCLC, n=156).Results Low tumor purity was common (range 30%–45%) in real-world samples from ICI-treated patients. In the survival analyzes of public cohorts, wTMB could not predict the clinical benefit of immunotherapy when tumor purity was low (log-rank p=0.874), whereas pTMB could effectively stratify the survival outcome (log-rank p=0.020). In the paired-BRCA and paired-NSCLC cohorts, pTMB was less affected by tumor purity, with significantly more somatic variants identified at low allele frequency (p<0.001). We found that wTMB was significantly underestimated in low purity samples with a large proportion of clonal variants undetected by whole-exome sequencing. Interestingly, pTMB more accurately predicted progression-free survival (PFS) after immunotherapy than wTMB owing to its superior performance in the low tumor purity subgroup (p=0.054 vs p=0.358). Multivariate analysis revealed pTMB (p=0.016), but not wTMB (p=0.32), as an independent predictor of PFS even in low-purity samples. The net reclassification index using pTMB was 21.7% in the low-purity subgroup (p=0.016).Conclusions Our data suggest that TMB characterization with targeted deep sequencing might have potential strength in predicting ICI responsiveness due to its enhanced sensitivity for hard-to-detect variants at low-allele fraction. Therefore, pTMB could act as an invaluable biomarker in the setting of both clinical trials and practice outside of trials based on its reliable performance in mitigating the purity-related bias.https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001199.full