Pakiramdaman: Isang Tatak Filipinong Lapit sa Pagdadalumat sa Sosyolohiya (Pakiramdaman: A Filipino Brand of Reflective Inquiry in Sociology)

The article contends that neither theory-building nor theorizing is an exclusive means of understanding the social in Philippine sociological discourse. Pagdadalumat as a homegrown reflexive inquiry proves to be more proficient and powerful an approach in making sense of the foundational principles...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dennis S. Erasga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Philippines 2015-06-01
Series:Humanities Diliman
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/humanitiesdiliman/article/view/4646
id doaj-47c3d72edbd0462c8bfd8071afeb6b6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47c3d72edbd0462c8bfd8071afeb6b6e2020-11-24T23:23:19ZengUniversity of the PhilippinesHumanities Diliman1655-15322012-07882015-06-0112178105Pakiramdaman: Isang Tatak Filipinong Lapit sa Pagdadalumat sa Sosyolohiya (Pakiramdaman: A Filipino Brand of Reflective Inquiry in Sociology)Dennis S. Erasga0De La Salle UniversityThe article contends that neither theory-building nor theorizing is an exclusive means of understanding the social in Philippine sociological discourse. Pagdadalumat as a homegrown reflexive inquiry proves to be more proficient and powerful an approach in making sense of the foundational principles of the discipline. Henceforth, the article examines the two implicated issues of doing pagdadalumat in the production of sociological knowledge in the Philippines viz. (i) the concept of kapwa as manifestation of the nexus of the Self and Other (ii) and the epistemological affordances of pagdadalumat versus the rigid evidence-seeking temperament of scientif ic inquiry. At the end, an outline of a sociological model of pagdadalumat is presented—pakiramdaman—anchored on an indigenous communicative practice (pakikipagtalastasan) using four (4) Filipino social constructs—lapit, galang, hiya, lusot—and their corresponding indicators—relasyon, kapwa, sitwasyon, kahihinatnan.http://www.journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/humanitiesdiliman/article/view/4646Homegrown reflexive inquirysociologypakiramdamantext/contextPantayong Pananawtheoryindigenous communicative practice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dennis S. Erasga
spellingShingle Dennis S. Erasga
Pakiramdaman: Isang Tatak Filipinong Lapit sa Pagdadalumat sa Sosyolohiya (Pakiramdaman: A Filipino Brand of Reflective Inquiry in Sociology)
Humanities Diliman
Homegrown reflexive inquiry
sociology
pakiramdaman
text/context
Pantayong Pananaw
theory
indigenous communicative practice
author_facet Dennis S. Erasga
author_sort Dennis S. Erasga
title Pakiramdaman: Isang Tatak Filipinong Lapit sa Pagdadalumat sa Sosyolohiya (Pakiramdaman: A Filipino Brand of Reflective Inquiry in Sociology)
title_short Pakiramdaman: Isang Tatak Filipinong Lapit sa Pagdadalumat sa Sosyolohiya (Pakiramdaman: A Filipino Brand of Reflective Inquiry in Sociology)
title_full Pakiramdaman: Isang Tatak Filipinong Lapit sa Pagdadalumat sa Sosyolohiya (Pakiramdaman: A Filipino Brand of Reflective Inquiry in Sociology)
title_fullStr Pakiramdaman: Isang Tatak Filipinong Lapit sa Pagdadalumat sa Sosyolohiya (Pakiramdaman: A Filipino Brand of Reflective Inquiry in Sociology)
title_full_unstemmed Pakiramdaman: Isang Tatak Filipinong Lapit sa Pagdadalumat sa Sosyolohiya (Pakiramdaman: A Filipino Brand of Reflective Inquiry in Sociology)
title_sort pakiramdaman: isang tatak filipinong lapit sa pagdadalumat sa sosyolohiya (pakiramdaman: a filipino brand of reflective inquiry in sociology)
publisher University of the Philippines
series Humanities Diliman
issn 1655-1532
2012-0788
publishDate 2015-06-01
description The article contends that neither theory-building nor theorizing is an exclusive means of understanding the social in Philippine sociological discourse. Pagdadalumat as a homegrown reflexive inquiry proves to be more proficient and powerful an approach in making sense of the foundational principles of the discipline. Henceforth, the article examines the two implicated issues of doing pagdadalumat in the production of sociological knowledge in the Philippines viz. (i) the concept of kapwa as manifestation of the nexus of the Self and Other (ii) and the epistemological affordances of pagdadalumat versus the rigid evidence-seeking temperament of scientif ic inquiry. At the end, an outline of a sociological model of pagdadalumat is presented—pakiramdaman—anchored on an indigenous communicative practice (pakikipagtalastasan) using four (4) Filipino social constructs—lapit, galang, hiya, lusot—and their corresponding indicators—relasyon, kapwa, sitwasyon, kahihinatnan.
topic Homegrown reflexive inquiry
sociology
pakiramdaman
text/context
Pantayong Pananaw
theory
indigenous communicative practice
url http://www.journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/humanitiesdiliman/article/view/4646
work_keys_str_mv AT dennisserasga pakiramdamanisangtatakfilipinonglapitsapagdadalumatsasosyolohiyapakiramdamanafilipinobrandofreflectiveinquiryinsociology
_version_ 1725564109707018240