LA EVALUACION DE LA PENALIZACIÓN AL DELINCUENTE

The social perception of the penalization of the crimes is a key to understanding the social dynamics and its relation to criminal proceedings element. It is used as a justification for criminal expansionist policy, always founded on worry or alarm. The paper analyzes the evolution of the suffici...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Diego Becerril Ruiz
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de Almería 2014-12-01
Series:Revista Internacional de Doctrina y Jurisprudencia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://w3.ual.es/revistas/RevistaInternacionaldeDoctrinayJurisprudencia/pdfs/2014-12/LA%20EVALUACION%20DE%20LA%20PENALIZACI%C3%93N%20AL%20DELINCUENTE.pdf
id doaj-478d83245c634f6f9e0b47b552ee485e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-478d83245c634f6f9e0b47b552ee485e2020-11-24T22:36:36ZspaUniversidad de AlmeríaRevista Internacional de Doctrina y Jurisprudencia2255-18242255-18242014-12-018LA EVALUACION DE LA PENALIZACIÓN AL DELINCUENTEDiego Becerril Ruiz0Universidad de GranadaThe social perception of the penalization of the crimes is a key to understanding the social dynamics and its relation to criminal proceedings element. It is used as a justification for criminal expansionist policy, always founded on worry or alarm. The paper analyzes the evolution of the sufficiency of punishment during the last 35 years (1980-2014) and the assignment of responsibilities. Next to the description and evolution has built a favorable profile people toughen punishment. The data source are secondary, surveys conducted by the Centre for Sociological Research (CIS), the Eurobarometer and the European Social Survey. The scope is national. The main conclusions are that the evaluation of justice as benevolent and fondness for harsher punishments draw a trend of steady increase, unless exceptional falls. This attitude is more pronounced among people with lower level of education, women, elderly, ideologically right, lower income and Catholics. The responsibility of insufficient punishment is mainly ascribed to the entire system, except the police, although the structural elements (judicial organization laws) more than functional (judges, prosecutors).https://w3.ual.es/revistas/RevistaInternacionaldeDoctrinayJurisprudencia/pdfs/2014-12/LA%20EVALUACION%20DE%20LA%20PENALIZACI%C3%93N%20AL%20DELINCUENTE.pdfPublic opinion; Perception of criminal severity; punitivism
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diego Becerril Ruiz
spellingShingle Diego Becerril Ruiz
LA EVALUACION DE LA PENALIZACIÓN AL DELINCUENTE
Revista Internacional de Doctrina y Jurisprudencia
Public opinion; Perception of criminal severity; punitivism
author_facet Diego Becerril Ruiz
author_sort Diego Becerril Ruiz
title LA EVALUACION DE LA PENALIZACIÓN AL DELINCUENTE
title_short LA EVALUACION DE LA PENALIZACIÓN AL DELINCUENTE
title_full LA EVALUACION DE LA PENALIZACIÓN AL DELINCUENTE
title_fullStr LA EVALUACION DE LA PENALIZACIÓN AL DELINCUENTE
title_full_unstemmed LA EVALUACION DE LA PENALIZACIÓN AL DELINCUENTE
title_sort la evaluacion de la penalización al delincuente
publisher Universidad de Almería
series Revista Internacional de Doctrina y Jurisprudencia
issn 2255-1824
2255-1824
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The social perception of the penalization of the crimes is a key to understanding the social dynamics and its relation to criminal proceedings element. It is used as a justification for criminal expansionist policy, always founded on worry or alarm. The paper analyzes the evolution of the sufficiency of punishment during the last 35 years (1980-2014) and the assignment of responsibilities. Next to the description and evolution has built a favorable profile people toughen punishment. The data source are secondary, surveys conducted by the Centre for Sociological Research (CIS), the Eurobarometer and the European Social Survey. The scope is national. The main conclusions are that the evaluation of justice as benevolent and fondness for harsher punishments draw a trend of steady increase, unless exceptional falls. This attitude is more pronounced among people with lower level of education, women, elderly, ideologically right, lower income and Catholics. The responsibility of insufficient punishment is mainly ascribed to the entire system, except the police, although the structural elements (judicial organization laws) more than functional (judges, prosecutors).
topic Public opinion; Perception of criminal severity; punitivism
url https://w3.ual.es/revistas/RevistaInternacionaldeDoctrinayJurisprudencia/pdfs/2014-12/LA%20EVALUACION%20DE%20LA%20PENALIZACI%C3%93N%20AL%20DELINCUENTE.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT diegobecerrilruiz laevaluaciondelapenalizacionaldelincuente
_version_ 1725719474125930496