Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study

Abstract Background Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) effectively relieves the labor pain, but it is still not available consistently for multiparous women in many institutions because of their obviously shortened labor length. Methods A total of 811 multiprous women were retrospective enrolled and fir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuzhi Luo, Zhaowen Chen, Xujian Wang, Changyu Zhu, Shili Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-04-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01355-0
id doaj-476d6f4d9c934429a148e5ebefb6efdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-476d6f4d9c934429a148e5ebefb6efdf2021-05-02T11:30:20ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532021-04-012111910.1186/s12871-021-01355-0Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control studyShuzhi Luo0Zhaowen Chen1Xujian Wang2Changyu Zhu3Shili Su4Department of Anesthesiology, Shandong Province Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shandong Province Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shandong Province Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shandong Province Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shandong Province Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalAbstract Background Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) effectively relieves the labor pain, but it is still not available consistently for multiparous women in many institutions because of their obviously shortened labor length. Methods A total of 811 multiprous women were retrospective enrolled and firstly divided into two groups: LEA group or non-LEA group. And then they were divided into seven subgroups and analyzed according to the use of LEA and cervical dilation. The primary outcomes (time intervals, blood loss and Apgar scores) and secondary outcomes (maternal demographic characteristics and birth weight) were collected by checking electronic medical records. Results The prevalence of using LEA in multiprous women was 54.5 %. Using LEA significantly lengthened the duration of labor stage by 56 min (P < 0.001), increased the blood loss (P < 0.001) and lowered Apgar scores (P = 0.001). In the comparison of sub-group analysis, using LEA can obviously prolong the duration of first-second stage in women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P < 0.001) and 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.014), while there was no significant difference with 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.69). Using LEA can significantly increased the blood loss when the initiation of LEA in the women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P < 0.001) and 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.035), meanwhile there were no significantly differences in the women with 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.524). Using LEA can significantly lower the Apgar scores when the initiation of LEA in the women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.001) and 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.025), while there were no significantly differences in the women with 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.839). Conclusions Labor epidural analgesia for the multiparous woman may alter progress of labor, increase postpartum blood loss and lower Apgar scores. Early or late initiation of LEA should be defined as with cervical dilatation of less or more than 3 cm and the different effect should be understand. Trial registration ChiCTR2100042746. Registered 27 January 2021-Prospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn .https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01355-0EpiduralAnalgesiaLabor durationLabor stageMultiparaMaternal and neonatal outcomes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shuzhi Luo
Zhaowen Chen
Xujian Wang
Changyu Zhu
Shili Su
spellingShingle Shuzhi Luo
Zhaowen Chen
Xujian Wang
Changyu Zhu
Shili Su
Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study
BMC Anesthesiology
Epidural
Analgesia
Labor duration
Labor stage
Multipara
Maternal and neonatal outcomes
author_facet Shuzhi Luo
Zhaowen Chen
Xujian Wang
Changyu Zhu
Shili Su
author_sort Shuzhi Luo
title Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study
title_short Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study
title_full Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study
title_fullStr Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study
title_full_unstemmed Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study
title_sort labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study
publisher BMC
series BMC Anesthesiology
issn 1471-2253
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Background Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) effectively relieves the labor pain, but it is still not available consistently for multiparous women in many institutions because of their obviously shortened labor length. Methods A total of 811 multiprous women were retrospective enrolled and firstly divided into two groups: LEA group or non-LEA group. And then they were divided into seven subgroups and analyzed according to the use of LEA and cervical dilation. The primary outcomes (time intervals, blood loss and Apgar scores) and secondary outcomes (maternal demographic characteristics and birth weight) were collected by checking electronic medical records. Results The prevalence of using LEA in multiprous women was 54.5 %. Using LEA significantly lengthened the duration of labor stage by 56 min (P < 0.001), increased the blood loss (P < 0.001) and lowered Apgar scores (P = 0.001). In the comparison of sub-group analysis, using LEA can obviously prolong the duration of first-second stage in women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P < 0.001) and 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.014), while there was no significant difference with 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.69). Using LEA can significantly increased the blood loss when the initiation of LEA in the women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P < 0.001) and 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.035), meanwhile there were no significantly differences in the women with 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.524). Using LEA can significantly lower the Apgar scores when the initiation of LEA in the women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.001) and 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.025), while there were no significantly differences in the women with 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.839). Conclusions Labor epidural analgesia for the multiparous woman may alter progress of labor, increase postpartum blood loss and lower Apgar scores. Early or late initiation of LEA should be defined as with cervical dilatation of less or more than 3 cm and the different effect should be understand. Trial registration ChiCTR2100042746. Registered 27 January 2021-Prospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn .
topic Epidural
Analgesia
Labor duration
Labor stage
Multipara
Maternal and neonatal outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01355-0
work_keys_str_mv AT shuzhiluo laborepiduralanalgesiaversuswithoutlaborepiduralanalgesiaformultiparouswomenaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT zhaowenchen laborepiduralanalgesiaversuswithoutlaborepiduralanalgesiaformultiparouswomenaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT xujianwang laborepiduralanalgesiaversuswithoutlaborepiduralanalgesiaformultiparouswomenaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT changyuzhu laborepiduralanalgesiaversuswithoutlaborepiduralanalgesiaformultiparouswomenaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT shilisu laborepiduralanalgesiaversuswithoutlaborepiduralanalgesiaformultiparouswomenaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
_version_ 1721492054222045184