Power Assessment in Road Cycling: A Narrative Review

Nowadays, the evaluation of physiological characteristics and training load quantification in road cycling is frequently performed through power meter data analyses, but the scientific evidence behind this tool is scarce and often contradictory. The aim of this paper is to review the literature rela...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Sitko, Rafel Cirer-Sastre, Francisco Corbi, and Isaac López-Laval
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5216
id doaj-476d0b08aa0a4d1f810763e15fd9e6ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-476d0b08aa0a4d1f810763e15fd9e6ff2020-11-25T03:31:52ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-06-01125216521610.3390/su12125216Power Assessment in Road Cycling: A Narrative ReviewSebastian Sitko0Rafel Cirer-Sastre1Francisco Corbi2and Isaac López-Laval3Department of Physiatry and Nursery, Section of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 22004 Huesca, SpainNational Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida (UdL), E-25192 Lleida, SpainNational Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida (UdL), E-25192 Lleida, SpainDepartment of Physiatry and Nursery, Section of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 22004 Huesca, SpainNowadays, the evaluation of physiological characteristics and training load quantification in road cycling is frequently performed through power meter data analyses, but the scientific evidence behind this tool is scarce and often contradictory. The aim of this paper is to review the literature related to power profiling, functional threshold testing, and performance assessment based on power meter data. A literature search was conducted following preferred reporting items for review statement (PRISMA) on the topic of {“cyclist<i>”</i><i> </i>OR<i> </i><i>“</i>cycling<i>”</i><i> </i>AND<i> </i><i>“</i>functional threshold<i>”</i><i> </i>OR<i> </i><i>“</i>power meter<i>”</i><i>}</i><i>.</i> The reviewed evidence provided important insights regarding power meter-based training: a) functional threshold testing is closely related to laboratory markers of steady state; b) the 20-min protocol represents the most researched option for functional threshold testing, although shorter durations may be used if verified on an individual basis; c) power profiling obtained through the recovery of recorded power outputs allows the categorization and assessment of the cyclist’s fitness level; and d) power meters represent an alternative to laboratory tests for the assessment of the relationship between power output and cadence. This review elucidates the increasing amount of studies related to power profiling, functional threshold testing, and performance assessment based on power meter data, highlighting the opportunity for the expanding knowledge that power meters have brought in the road cycling field.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5216functional thresholdpower meterendurancetrainingperformance assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Sitko
Rafel Cirer-Sastre
Francisco Corbi
and Isaac López-Laval
spellingShingle Sebastian Sitko
Rafel Cirer-Sastre
Francisco Corbi
and Isaac López-Laval
Power Assessment in Road Cycling: A Narrative Review
Sustainability
functional threshold
power meter
endurance
training
performance assessment
author_facet Sebastian Sitko
Rafel Cirer-Sastre
Francisco Corbi
and Isaac López-Laval
author_sort Sebastian Sitko
title Power Assessment in Road Cycling: A Narrative Review
title_short Power Assessment in Road Cycling: A Narrative Review
title_full Power Assessment in Road Cycling: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Power Assessment in Road Cycling: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Power Assessment in Road Cycling: A Narrative Review
title_sort power assessment in road cycling: a narrative review
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Nowadays, the evaluation of physiological characteristics and training load quantification in road cycling is frequently performed through power meter data analyses, but the scientific evidence behind this tool is scarce and often contradictory. The aim of this paper is to review the literature related to power profiling, functional threshold testing, and performance assessment based on power meter data. A literature search was conducted following preferred reporting items for review statement (PRISMA) on the topic of {“cyclist<i>”</i><i> </i>OR<i> </i><i>“</i>cycling<i>”</i><i> </i>AND<i> </i><i>“</i>functional threshold<i>”</i><i> </i>OR<i> </i><i>“</i>power meter<i>”</i><i>}</i><i>.</i> The reviewed evidence provided important insights regarding power meter-based training: a) functional threshold testing is closely related to laboratory markers of steady state; b) the 20-min protocol represents the most researched option for functional threshold testing, although shorter durations may be used if verified on an individual basis; c) power profiling obtained through the recovery of recorded power outputs allows the categorization and assessment of the cyclist’s fitness level; and d) power meters represent an alternative to laboratory tests for the assessment of the relationship between power output and cadence. This review elucidates the increasing amount of studies related to power profiling, functional threshold testing, and performance assessment based on power meter data, highlighting the opportunity for the expanding knowledge that power meters have brought in the road cycling field.
topic functional threshold
power meter
endurance
training
performance assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5216
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastiansitko powerassessmentinroadcyclinganarrativereview
AT rafelcirersastre powerassessmentinroadcyclinganarrativereview
AT franciscocorbi powerassessmentinroadcyclinganarrativereview
AT andisaaclopezlaval powerassessmentinroadcyclinganarrativereview
_version_ 1724571217237639168