Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events.

Many events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in tim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manuel Vidal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5312923?pdf=render
id doaj-4763b0185f1741279b8d8467530bee80
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4763b0185f1741279b8d8467530bee802020-11-25T00:02:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01122e017202810.1371/journal.pone.0172028Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events.Manuel VidalMany events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in time to correctly perceive synchrony. This project aims at quantifying the mutual temporal attraction between senses and characterizing the different interaction modes depending on the offset. In every trial participants saw four beep-flash pairs regularly spaced in time, followed after a variable delay by a fifth event in the test modality (auditory or visual). A large range of AV offsets was tested. The task was to judge whether the last event came before/after what was expected given the perceived rhythm, while attending only to the test modality. Flashes were perceptually shifted in time toward beeps, the attraction being stronger for lagging than leading beeps. Conversely, beeps were not shifted toward flashes, indicating a nearly total auditory capture. The subjective timing of the visual component resulting from the AV interaction could easily be forward but not backward in time, an intuitive constraint stemming from minimum visual processing delays. Finally, matching auditory and visual time-sensitivity with beeps embedded in pink noise produced very similar mutual attractions of beeps and flashes. Breaking the natural auditory preference for timing allowed vision to take over as well, showing that this preference is not hardwired.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5312923?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manuel Vidal
spellingShingle Manuel Vidal
Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Manuel Vidal
author_sort Manuel Vidal
title Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events.
title_short Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events.
title_full Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events.
title_fullStr Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events.
title_full_unstemmed Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events.
title_sort hearing flashes and seeing beeps: timing audiovisual events.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Many events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in time to correctly perceive synchrony. This project aims at quantifying the mutual temporal attraction between senses and characterizing the different interaction modes depending on the offset. In every trial participants saw four beep-flash pairs regularly spaced in time, followed after a variable delay by a fifth event in the test modality (auditory or visual). A large range of AV offsets was tested. The task was to judge whether the last event came before/after what was expected given the perceived rhythm, while attending only to the test modality. Flashes were perceptually shifted in time toward beeps, the attraction being stronger for lagging than leading beeps. Conversely, beeps were not shifted toward flashes, indicating a nearly total auditory capture. The subjective timing of the visual component resulting from the AV interaction could easily be forward but not backward in time, an intuitive constraint stemming from minimum visual processing delays. Finally, matching auditory and visual time-sensitivity with beeps embedded in pink noise produced very similar mutual attractions of beeps and flashes. Breaking the natural auditory preference for timing allowed vision to take over as well, showing that this preference is not hardwired.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5312923?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelvidal hearingflashesandseeingbeepstimingaudiovisualevents
_version_ 1725439098229882880