The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality.
<h4>Background</h4>Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality science, but very little is known about the previous experiences and training that might identify high-quality peer reviewers. The reviewer selection processes of most journals, and thus the...
Main Authors: | Michael L Callaham, John Tercier |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2007-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS Medicine |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040040 |
Similar Items
-
Training and Experience of Peer Reviewers: Authors' Reply.
by: Michael Callaham
Published: (2007-03-01) -
Training of peer reviewers: validation of a 5-point rating scale.
by: Michael Callaham
Published: (2007-04-01) -
Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial
by: Houry Debra, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01) -
Assuring the quality of scholarly South African journals: An experiment in journal peer review
by: Robin Crewe
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Perceptions of conflict of interest disclosures among peer reviewers.
by: Suzanne Lippert, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)