A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism
Different clinical studies have provided empirical evidence for impairments in cognitive control in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The challenge arises, however, when trying to specify the neurocognitive mechanisms behind the reported observations of deviant patterns of goal-direc...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00436/full |
id |
doaj-47582ac3623e4606a260529d8cf775bf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-47582ac3623e4606a260529d8cf775bf2020-11-24T22:36:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782012-10-01310.3389/fpsyg.2012.0043632512A review of intentional and cognitive control in autismEdita ePoljac0Harold eBekkering1University of OxfordRadboud University NijmegenDifferent clinical studies have provided empirical evidence for impairments in cognitive control in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The challenge arises, however, when trying to specify the neurocognitive mechanisms behind the reported observations of deviant patterns of goal-directed behaviour in ASD. Studies trying to test specific assumptions by applying designs that are based on a more controlled experimental conditions often fail in providing strong evidence for an impairment in specific cognitive functions. In this review, we summarize and critically reflect on behavioural findings and their theoretical explanations regarding cognitive control processing in autism, also from a developmental perspective. The specific focus of this review is the recent evidence of deficits in intentional control— a specific subset of cognitive control processes that biases the choice of our behavioural goals— coming from different research fields. We relate this evidence to the cognitive rigidity observed in ASD and argue that individuals with ASD experience problems at intentional level rather than at the level of the implementation of the intentions. Both these processes are related to cognitive control mechanisms but in different ways. Finally, we discuss new directions in studying cognitive control in ASD and how these relate to adaptive intentional cognition.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00436/fullautismcognitive controlActionsIntentionsbehavioural rigidityopen and closed systems |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Edita ePoljac Harold eBekkering |
spellingShingle |
Edita ePoljac Harold eBekkering A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism Frontiers in Psychology autism cognitive control Actions Intentions behavioural rigidity open and closed systems |
author_facet |
Edita ePoljac Harold eBekkering |
author_sort |
Edita ePoljac |
title |
A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism |
title_short |
A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism |
title_full |
A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism |
title_fullStr |
A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism |
title_full_unstemmed |
A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism |
title_sort |
review of intentional and cognitive control in autism |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2012-10-01 |
description |
Different clinical studies have provided empirical evidence for impairments in cognitive control in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The challenge arises, however, when trying to specify the neurocognitive mechanisms behind the reported observations of deviant patterns of goal-directed behaviour in ASD. Studies trying to test specific assumptions by applying designs that are based on a more controlled experimental conditions often fail in providing strong evidence for an impairment in specific cognitive functions. In this review, we summarize and critically reflect on behavioural findings and their theoretical explanations regarding cognitive control processing in autism, also from a developmental perspective. The specific focus of this review is the recent evidence of deficits in intentional control— a specific subset of cognitive control processes that biases the choice of our behavioural goals— coming from different research fields. We relate this evidence to the cognitive rigidity observed in ASD and argue that individuals with ASD experience problems at intentional level rather than at the level of the implementation of the intentions. Both these processes are related to cognitive control mechanisms but in different ways. Finally, we discuss new directions in studying cognitive control in ASD and how these relate to adaptive intentional cognition. |
topic |
autism cognitive control Actions Intentions behavioural rigidity open and closed systems |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00436/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT editaepoljac areviewofintentionalandcognitivecontrolinautism AT haroldebekkering areviewofintentionalandcognitivecontrolinautism AT editaepoljac reviewofintentionalandcognitivecontrolinautism AT haroldebekkering reviewofintentionalandcognitivecontrolinautism |
_version_ |
1725720889181339648 |