A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism

Different clinical studies have provided empirical evidence for impairments in cognitive control in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The challenge arises, however, when trying to specify the neurocognitive mechanisms behind the reported observations of deviant patterns of goal-direc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edita ePoljac, Harold eBekkering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00436/full
id doaj-47582ac3623e4606a260529d8cf775bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47582ac3623e4606a260529d8cf775bf2020-11-24T22:36:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782012-10-01310.3389/fpsyg.2012.0043632512A review of intentional and cognitive control in autismEdita ePoljac0Harold eBekkering1University of OxfordRadboud University NijmegenDifferent clinical studies have provided empirical evidence for impairments in cognitive control in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The challenge arises, however, when trying to specify the neurocognitive mechanisms behind the reported observations of deviant patterns of goal-directed behaviour in ASD. Studies trying to test specific assumptions by applying designs that are based on a more controlled experimental conditions often fail in providing strong evidence for an impairment in specific cognitive functions. In this review, we summarize and critically reflect on behavioural findings and their theoretical explanations regarding cognitive control processing in autism, also from a developmental perspective. The specific focus of this review is the recent evidence of deficits in intentional control— a specific subset of cognitive control processes that biases the choice of our behavioural goals— coming from different research fields. We relate this evidence to the cognitive rigidity observed in ASD and argue that individuals with ASD experience problems at intentional level rather than at the level of the implementation of the intentions. Both these processes are related to cognitive control mechanisms but in different ways. Finally, we discuss new directions in studying cognitive control in ASD and how these relate to adaptive intentional cognition.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00436/fullautismcognitive controlActionsIntentionsbehavioural rigidityopen and closed systems
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edita ePoljac
Harold eBekkering
spellingShingle Edita ePoljac
Harold eBekkering
A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism
Frontiers in Psychology
autism
cognitive control
Actions
Intentions
behavioural rigidity
open and closed systems
author_facet Edita ePoljac
Harold eBekkering
author_sort Edita ePoljac
title A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism
title_short A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism
title_full A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism
title_fullStr A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism
title_full_unstemmed A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism
title_sort review of intentional and cognitive control in autism
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Different clinical studies have provided empirical evidence for impairments in cognitive control in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The challenge arises, however, when trying to specify the neurocognitive mechanisms behind the reported observations of deviant patterns of goal-directed behaviour in ASD. Studies trying to test specific assumptions by applying designs that are based on a more controlled experimental conditions often fail in providing strong evidence for an impairment in specific cognitive functions. In this review, we summarize and critically reflect on behavioural findings and their theoretical explanations regarding cognitive control processing in autism, also from a developmental perspective. The specific focus of this review is the recent evidence of deficits in intentional control— a specific subset of cognitive control processes that biases the choice of our behavioural goals— coming from different research fields. We relate this evidence to the cognitive rigidity observed in ASD and argue that individuals with ASD experience problems at intentional level rather than at the level of the implementation of the intentions. Both these processes are related to cognitive control mechanisms but in different ways. Finally, we discuss new directions in studying cognitive control in ASD and how these relate to adaptive intentional cognition.
topic autism
cognitive control
Actions
Intentions
behavioural rigidity
open and closed systems
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00436/full
work_keys_str_mv AT editaepoljac areviewofintentionalandcognitivecontrolinautism
AT haroldebekkering areviewofintentionalandcognitivecontrolinautism
AT editaepoljac reviewofintentionalandcognitivecontrolinautism
AT haroldebekkering reviewofintentionalandcognitivecontrolinautism
_version_ 1725720889181339648