Hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Several uncontrolled studies of hyperbaric treatment in children with autism have reported clinical improvements; however, this treatment has not been evaluated to date with a controlled study. We performed a multicenter, randomized,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Pediatrics |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/9/21 |
id |
doaj-475799903fa4481bb1186308c3b551d1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-475799903fa4481bb1186308c3b551d12020-11-24T22:24:40ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312009-03-01912110.1186/1471-2431-9-21Hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trialUsman AnjuLogerquist SallySchneider CindySmith ScottRossignol Lanier WRossignol Daniel ANeubrander JimMadren Eric MHintz GreggGrushkin BarryMumper Elizabeth A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Several uncontrolled studies of hyperbaric treatment in children with autism have reported clinical improvements; however, this treatment has not been evaluated to date with a controlled study. We performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to assess the efficacy of hyperbaric treatment in children with autism.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>62 children with autism recruited from 6 centers, ages 2–7 years (mean 4.92 ± 1.21), were randomly assigned to 40 hourly treatments of either hyperbaric treatment at 1.3 atmosphere (atm) and 24% oxygen ("treatment group", n = 33) or slightly pressurized room air at 1.03 atm and 21% oxygen ("control group", n = 29). Outcome measures included Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), and Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After 40 sessions, mean physician CGI scores significantly improved in the treatment group compared to controls in overall functioning (p = 0.0008), receptive language (p < 0.0001), social interaction (p = 0.0473), and eye contact (p = 0.0102); 9/30 children (30%) in the treatment group were rated as "very much improved" or "much improved" compared to 2/26 (8%) of controls (p = 0.0471); 24/30 (80%) in the treatment group improved compared to 10/26 (38%) of controls (p = 0.0024). Mean parental CGI scores significantly improved in the treatment group compared to controls in overall functioning (p = 0.0336), receptive language (p = 0.0168), and eye contact (p = 0.0322). On the ABC, significant improvements were observed in the treatment group in total score, irritability, stereotypy, hyperactivity, and speech (p < 0.03 for each), but not in the control group. In the treatment group compared to the control group, mean changes on the ABC total score and subscales were similar except a greater number of children improved in irritability (p = 0.0311). On the ATEC, sensory/cognitive awareness significantly improved (p = 0.0367) in the treatment group compared to the control group. Post-hoc analysis indicated that children over age 5 and children with lower initial autism severity had the most robust improvements. Hyperbaric treatment was safe and well-tolerated.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Children with autism who received hyperbaric treatment at 1.3 atm and 24% oxygen for 40 hourly sessions had significant improvements in overall functioning, receptive language, social interaction, eye contact, and sensory/cognitive awareness compared to children who received slightly pressurized room air.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>clinicaltrials.gov NCT00335790</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/9/21 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Usman Anju Logerquist Sally Schneider Cindy Smith Scott Rossignol Lanier W Rossignol Daniel A Neubrander Jim Madren Eric M Hintz Gregg Grushkin Barry Mumper Elizabeth A |
spellingShingle |
Usman Anju Logerquist Sally Schneider Cindy Smith Scott Rossignol Lanier W Rossignol Daniel A Neubrander Jim Madren Eric M Hintz Gregg Grushkin Barry Mumper Elizabeth A Hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial BMC Pediatrics |
author_facet |
Usman Anju Logerquist Sally Schneider Cindy Smith Scott Rossignol Lanier W Rossignol Daniel A Neubrander Jim Madren Eric M Hintz Gregg Grushkin Barry Mumper Elizabeth A |
author_sort |
Usman Anju |
title |
Hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial |
title_short |
Hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial |
title_full |
Hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial |
title_sort |
hyperbaric treatment for children with autism: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Pediatrics |
issn |
1471-2431 |
publishDate |
2009-03-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Several uncontrolled studies of hyperbaric treatment in children with autism have reported clinical improvements; however, this treatment has not been evaluated to date with a controlled study. We performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to assess the efficacy of hyperbaric treatment in children with autism.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>62 children with autism recruited from 6 centers, ages 2–7 years (mean 4.92 ± 1.21), were randomly assigned to 40 hourly treatments of either hyperbaric treatment at 1.3 atmosphere (atm) and 24% oxygen ("treatment group", n = 33) or slightly pressurized room air at 1.03 atm and 21% oxygen ("control group", n = 29). Outcome measures included Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), and Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After 40 sessions, mean physician CGI scores significantly improved in the treatment group compared to controls in overall functioning (p = 0.0008), receptive language (p < 0.0001), social interaction (p = 0.0473), and eye contact (p = 0.0102); 9/30 children (30%) in the treatment group were rated as "very much improved" or "much improved" compared to 2/26 (8%) of controls (p = 0.0471); 24/30 (80%) in the treatment group improved compared to 10/26 (38%) of controls (p = 0.0024). Mean parental CGI scores significantly improved in the treatment group compared to controls in overall functioning (p = 0.0336), receptive language (p = 0.0168), and eye contact (p = 0.0322). On the ABC, significant improvements were observed in the treatment group in total score, irritability, stereotypy, hyperactivity, and speech (p < 0.03 for each), but not in the control group. In the treatment group compared to the control group, mean changes on the ABC total score and subscales were similar except a greater number of children improved in irritability (p = 0.0311). On the ATEC, sensory/cognitive awareness significantly improved (p = 0.0367) in the treatment group compared to the control group. Post-hoc analysis indicated that children over age 5 and children with lower initial autism severity had the most robust improvements. Hyperbaric treatment was safe and well-tolerated.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Children with autism who received hyperbaric treatment at 1.3 atm and 24% oxygen for 40 hourly sessions had significant improvements in overall functioning, receptive language, social interaction, eye contact, and sensory/cognitive awareness compared to children who received slightly pressurized room air.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>clinicaltrials.gov NCT00335790</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/9/21 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT usmananju hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT logerquistsally hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT schneidercindy hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT smithscott hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT rossignollanierw hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT rossignoldaniela hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT neubranderjim hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT madrenericm hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT hintzgregg hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT grushkinbarry hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT mumperelizabetha hyperbarictreatmentforchildrenwithautismamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1725760245702066176 |