Observation and modelling of HO<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forest

Measurements of OH and HO<sub>2</sub> radicals were conducted in a pine-dominated forest in southern Finland during the HUMPPA-COPEC-2010 (Hyytiälä United Measurements of Photochemistry and Particles in Air – Comprehensive Organic Precursor Emission and Concentration study) field...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Hens, A. Novelli, M. Martinez, J. Auld, R. Axinte, B. Bohn, H. Fischer, P. Keronen, D. Kubistin, A. C. Nölscher, R. Oswald, P. Paasonen, T. Petäjä, E. Regelin, R. Sander, V. Sinha, M. Sipilä, D. Taraborrelli, C. Tatum Ernest, J. Williams, J. Lelieveld, H. Harder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/8723/2014/acp-14-8723-2014.pdf
id doaj-474e7e4b56844a7ca15a1d091e8e1bbb
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. Hens
A. Novelli
M. Martinez
J. Auld
R. Axinte
B. Bohn
H. Fischer
P. Keronen
D. Kubistin
A. C. Nölscher
R. Oswald
P. Paasonen
T. Petäjä
E. Regelin
R. Sander
V. Sinha
M. Sipilä
D. Taraborrelli
C. Tatum Ernest
J. Williams
J. Lelieveld
H. Harder
spellingShingle K. Hens
A. Novelli
M. Martinez
J. Auld
R. Axinte
B. Bohn
H. Fischer
P. Keronen
D. Kubistin
A. C. Nölscher
R. Oswald
P. Paasonen
T. Petäjä
E. Regelin
R. Sander
V. Sinha
M. Sipilä
D. Taraborrelli
C. Tatum Ernest
J. Williams
J. Lelieveld
H. Harder
Observation and modelling of HO<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forest
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet K. Hens
A. Novelli
M. Martinez
J. Auld
R. Axinte
B. Bohn
H. Fischer
P. Keronen
D. Kubistin
A. C. Nölscher
R. Oswald
P. Paasonen
T. Petäjä
E. Regelin
R. Sander
V. Sinha
M. Sipilä
D. Taraborrelli
C. Tatum Ernest
J. Williams
J. Lelieveld
H. Harder
author_sort K. Hens
title Observation and modelling of HO<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forest
title_short Observation and modelling of HO<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forest
title_full Observation and modelling of HO<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forest
title_fullStr Observation and modelling of HO<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forest
title_full_unstemmed Observation and modelling of HO<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forest
title_sort observation and modelling of ho<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forest
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Measurements of OH and HO<sub>2</sub> radicals were conducted in a pine-dominated forest in southern Finland during the HUMPPA-COPEC-2010 (Hyytiälä United Measurements of Photochemistry and Particles in Air – Comprehensive Organic Precursor Emission and Concentration study) field campaign in summer 2010. Simultaneous side-by-side measurements of hydroxyl radicals were conducted with two instruments using chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), indicating small systematic disagreement, OH<sub>LIF</sub> / OH<sub>CIMS</sub> = (1.31 ± 0.14). Subsequently, the LIF instrument was moved to the top of a 20 m tower, just above the canopy, to investigate the radical chemistry at the ecosystem–atmosphere interface. Comprehensive measurements including observations of many volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the total OH reactivity were conducted and analysed using steady-state calculations as well as an observationally constrained box model. <br><br> Production rates of OH calculated from measured OH precursors are consistent with those derived from the steady-state assumption and measured total OH loss under conditions of moderate OH reactivity. The primary photolytic sources of OH contribute up to one-third to the total OH production. OH recycling, which occurs mainly by HO<sub>2</sub> reacting with NO and O<sub>3</sub>, dominates the total hydroxyl radical production in this boreal forest. Box model simulations agree with measurements for hydroxyl radicals (OH<sub>mod.</sub> / OH<sub>obs.</sub> = 1.00 ± 0.16), while HO<sub>2</sub> mixing ratios are significantly under-predicted (HO<sub>2</sub><sup>mod.</sup> / HO<sub>2</sub><sup>obs.</sup> = 0.3 ± 0.2), and simulated OH reactivity does not match the observed OH reactivity. The simultaneous under-prediction of HO<sub>2</sub> and OH reactivity in periods in which OH concentrations were simulated realistically suggests that the missing OH reactivity is an unaccounted-for source of HO<sub>2</sub>. <br><br> Detailed analysis of the HO<sub>x</sub> production, loss, and recycling pathways suggests that in periods of high total OH reactivity there are additional recycling processes forming OH directly, not via reaction of HO<sub>2</sub> with NO or O<sub>3</sub>, or unaccounted-for primary HO<sub>x</sub> sources. Under conditions of moderate observed OH reactivity and high actinic flux, an additional RO<sub>2</sub> source of approximately 1 &times; 10<sup>6</sup> molec cm<sup>&minus;3</sup> s<sup>&minus;1</sup> would be required to close the radical budget. Nevertheless, a major fraction of the OH recycling occurs via the reaction of HO<sub>2</sub> with NO and O<sub>3</sub> in this terpene-dominated environment.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/8723/2014/acp-14-8723-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT khens observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT anovelli observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT mmartinez observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT jauld observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT raxinte observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT bbohn observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT hfischer observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT pkeronen observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT dkubistin observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT acnolscher observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT roswald observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT ppaasonen observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT tpetaja observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT eregelin observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT rsander observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT vsinha observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT msipila observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT dtaraborrelli observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT ctatumernest observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT jwilliams observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT jlelieveld observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
AT hharder observationandmodellingofhosubxsubradicalsinaborealforest
_version_ 1725755669963866112
spelling doaj-474e7e4b56844a7ca15a1d091e8e1bbb2020-11-24T22:25:54ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242014-08-0114168723874710.5194/acp-14-8723-2014Observation and modelling of HO<sub>x</sub> radicals in a boreal forestK. Hens0A. Novelli1M. Martinez2J. Auld3R. Axinte4B. Bohn5H. Fischer6P. Keronen7D. Kubistin8A. C. Nölscher9R. Oswald10P. Paasonen11T. Petäjä12E. Regelin13R. Sander14V. Sinha15M. Sipilä16D. Taraborrelli17C. Tatum Ernest18J. Williams19J. Lelieveld20H. Harder21Dept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyInstitut für Energie- und Klimaforschung IEK-8: Troposphäre Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Phys., P.O. Box 64. 00014 University of Helsinki, FinlandDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Phys., P.O. Box 64. 00014 University of Helsinki, FinlandDept. Phys., P.O. Box 64. 00014 University of Helsinki, FinlandDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Sector 81, S.A.S. Nagar, Manauli PO, Mohali 140 306, Punjab, IndiaDept. Phys., P.O. Box 64. 00014 University of Helsinki, FinlandDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyDept. Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, GermanyMeasurements of OH and HO<sub>2</sub> radicals were conducted in a pine-dominated forest in southern Finland during the HUMPPA-COPEC-2010 (Hyytiälä United Measurements of Photochemistry and Particles in Air – Comprehensive Organic Precursor Emission and Concentration study) field campaign in summer 2010. Simultaneous side-by-side measurements of hydroxyl radicals were conducted with two instruments using chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), indicating small systematic disagreement, OH<sub>LIF</sub> / OH<sub>CIMS</sub> = (1.31 ± 0.14). Subsequently, the LIF instrument was moved to the top of a 20 m tower, just above the canopy, to investigate the radical chemistry at the ecosystem–atmosphere interface. Comprehensive measurements including observations of many volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the total OH reactivity were conducted and analysed using steady-state calculations as well as an observationally constrained box model. <br><br> Production rates of OH calculated from measured OH precursors are consistent with those derived from the steady-state assumption and measured total OH loss under conditions of moderate OH reactivity. The primary photolytic sources of OH contribute up to one-third to the total OH production. OH recycling, which occurs mainly by HO<sub>2</sub> reacting with NO and O<sub>3</sub>, dominates the total hydroxyl radical production in this boreal forest. Box model simulations agree with measurements for hydroxyl radicals (OH<sub>mod.</sub> / OH<sub>obs.</sub> = 1.00 ± 0.16), while HO<sub>2</sub> mixing ratios are significantly under-predicted (HO<sub>2</sub><sup>mod.</sup> / HO<sub>2</sub><sup>obs.</sup> = 0.3 ± 0.2), and simulated OH reactivity does not match the observed OH reactivity. The simultaneous under-prediction of HO<sub>2</sub> and OH reactivity in periods in which OH concentrations were simulated realistically suggests that the missing OH reactivity is an unaccounted-for source of HO<sub>2</sub>. <br><br> Detailed analysis of the HO<sub>x</sub> production, loss, and recycling pathways suggests that in periods of high total OH reactivity there are additional recycling processes forming OH directly, not via reaction of HO<sub>2</sub> with NO or O<sub>3</sub>, or unaccounted-for primary HO<sub>x</sub> sources. Under conditions of moderate observed OH reactivity and high actinic flux, an additional RO<sub>2</sub> source of approximately 1 &times; 10<sup>6</sup> molec cm<sup>&minus;3</sup> s<sup>&minus;1</sup> would be required to close the radical budget. Nevertheless, a major fraction of the OH recycling occurs via the reaction of HO<sub>2</sub> with NO and O<sub>3</sub> in this terpene-dominated environment.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/8723/2014/acp-14-8723-2014.pdf